「experts」の検索結果

Perform a rigorous Carmack Council code review. Use when explicitly asked to review code, do a "council review", "carmack review", or invoke /council-review. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js), Brandur Leach (Postgres), Vercel Performance, Simon Willison (LLM pipelines), Karri Saarinen (UI quality), Vitaly Friedman (UX quality), Kent Beck (test quality). Uses parallel subagents for deep, independent review. Produces prioritised P1/P2/P3 findings. Stack: Next.js App Router / React / TypeScript / tRPC / Prisma / Neon / Clerk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architect a feature with the Carmack Council before writing code. Use when explicitly asked to plan a feature, do a "council plan", "carmack plan", or invoke /council-plan. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js), Brandur Leach (Postgres), Vercel Performance, Simon Willison (LLM pipeline), Karri Saarinen (UI quality), Vitaly Friedman (UX quality). Interactive feature discovery followed by parallel subagent dispatch. Produces a sequenced, attributed implementation plan with no code. Stack: Next.js App Router / React / TypeScript / tRPC / Prisma / Neon / Clerk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bring how named experts would think about the question. Use when the user wants expert thinking on a tradeoff, choice, or stuck problem — not a verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add a new expert to the Remotion experts page

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Content angle generator for turning dry expert topics into high-engagement infotainment. Applies 7 journalistic angle types (Myth vs Reality, Paradox, Level Error, Price of Solution, Conditions, Hidden Driver, Contrary Thesis) + historical/future lens + news-hook framing. Use when experts need their content to become interesting rather than just informative - blog posts, video scripts, social content, newsletters, landing pages, ad hooks. For any niche: B2B, B2C, services, products, personal brand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create specialized agent experts with pre-loaded domain knowledge using the Act-Learn-Reuse pattern. Use when building domain-specific agents that maintain mental models via expertise files and self-improve prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bouwt de audit- en workshop-producten waarmee juridische experts een machine-leesbare (regelrecht-YAML) vertaling van wet- en regelgeving valideren in een live sessie. Gebruik dit bij het voorbereiden van een expert-workshop of validatie-sessie over een dossier, het maken van een scope-/stelselanalyse, per-artikel audit-checklists, facilitator-materiaal, testcase-scenario's, of sessie-verslagen (intern + extern). Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode (YAML, formules, untranslatables, source/override, legal_basis, engine-trace) is de vaste taal. Voor analytische desk-review van een corpus zonder live sessie (wetgevings-/stelselfouten, coverage, multi-agent review): zie de zusterskill regelrecht-stelselanalyse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Genereert uit een (semi-)gevalideerd regelrecht-corpus een geloofwaardige service-PoC (burger- + behandelaar-portaal, of een headless beslis-service) en zet die in als validatie-instrument met uitvoeringsexperts — om tastbaar te maken wat nodig is om een wet rechtvaardig in de praktijk te brengen, gezien vanuit de betrokkene. Gebruik dit als workshop-fase ná de logica-/scenariovalidatie (audit-products) om de dienstverlening-kant te valideren: welke service impliceert de wet, waar zit menselijk oordeel, welke last ligt bij de burger, welke termijnen, waar is de wet hard of onduidelijk. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode (hooks, legal_character, untranslatables, source/implements, type_spec, receipts) is de vaste taal. Voor de logica-/scenariovalidatie zelf: zie de zusterskill regelrecht-audit-products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Voert de iteratieve desk-review-&-completion-cyclus uit op een regelrecht-corpus — plannen, harvesten/migreren/uitbreiden, multi-agent valideren, bevindingen 4-weg classificeren (modellering-fout / wetgevings-fout / engine-limitatie / acceptabele untranslatable), synthese + heroverweging, documenteren (wetgevings-/stelselfouten-analyse, fixes-plan, engine-limitaties, diagrammen, corpus-status), verifiëren tegen externe bronnen (resolutie-tracker + bronnen-dossier), en een eindrapport per cyclus. Gebruik dit bij corpus-review op correctheid/coverage zonder live expert-sessie, het opstellen van een wetgevings-notitie-bron, schema-migratie, het harvesten van nieuwe wetten, of het aansturen van een autonome completion-loop. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode is de vaste taal. Voor live-validatie met experts: zie regelrecht-audit-products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an electrician's helper — running the NEC box-fill or conduit-fill calculation for a rough-in before wire gets pulled, bending conduit and pulling wire without exceeding practical bend/tension limits, running a non-contact continuity or polarity check at trim-out, or recognizing when a jobsite finding (reversed polarity, an undersized box, an unlabeled abandoned circuit) is a stop rather than a workaround.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrical and Electronic Equipment Assembler — inspecting a solder joint against the specific IPC/J-STD workmanship standard criteria rather than personal visual judgment, following ESD precautions for every component handled since damage is invisible at the time it occurs, verifying a crimped connection with a pull test rather than visual inspection alone, or treating a single suspected cold joint as a potential complete failure point rather than a minor defect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an embalmer — assessing a case's decomposition stage and preservation difficulty, calculating an arterial-fluid dilution ratio for a specific case condition, choosing a restorative-art approach for trauma or discoloration, or working through a bloodborne-pathogen exposure-control decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Engine and Other Machine Assembler — following the specified multi-stage torque sequence for a multi-bolt joint rather than tightening bolts to final value in convenient order, measuring bearing clearance directly rather than confirming free rotation by hand, verifying critical clearances on the actual assembled stack-up rather than trusting individually-in-tolerance components, or testing sub-assemblies before final integration rather than only at final test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an education administrator in a non-traditional setting — adult/continuing education, vocational or trade school, corporate/organizational training department, or other education programs outside standard K-12 or degree-granting postsecondary institutions. Covers the O*NET "Education Administrators, All Other" catch-all.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Embedded/Firmware Engineer — analyzing worst-case execution time for a hard real-time deadline, choosing static over dynamic memory allocation to avoid fragmentation on a long-uptime device, keeping an interrupt service routine minimal and deferring work to the main loop, synchronizing a variable shared between an ISR and main context to prevent a torn read, or verifying a hardware register interaction against the datasheet's exact timing rather than observed bench behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Engineering Teacher, Postsecondary — diagnosing a spike in a gatekeeper course's D/F/W rate, running a capstone design course with an industry sponsor, closing the loop on an ABET student-outcome assessment, or building a tenure/promotion teaching-effectiveness case beyond raw student evaluation scores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrician — sizing a service panel upgrade with an NEC load calculation, troubleshooting a tripping breaker or dead circuit systematically, checking wire gauge/ampacity and voltage drop for a circuit run, resolving a code-vs-inspector interpretation dispute, or deciding when a job (aluminum wiring, knob-and-tube, undersized service) exceeds the immediate scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Emergency Management Director — activating and staffing an EOC for a developing hazard, sequencing a disaster declaration and FEMA Public Assistance/Individual Assistance request, sizing shelter and resource needs against real population and capacity numbers, designing or critiquing a tabletop exercise, or writing an after-action report and improvement plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrical and Electronics Drafter — sizing a conductor and conduit for a panel or feeder circuit against NEC ampacity and fill tables, building a schematic/elementary diagram or one-line diagram on IEEE 315/ANSI Y32.2 symbols, cross-referencing wire numbers between a schematic and a panel wiring diagram, sizing a PCB trace against IPC-2221 current tables, or QC-checking an electrical drawing set before issuance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Energy Engineer working on building and industrial energy efficiency — running an ASHRAE Level 1/2/3 energy audit, calculating envelope heat loss/gain with the degree-day method, comparing HVAC equipment on SEER/EER/IEER/COP rather than nameplate alone, designing an IPMVP measurement and verification (M&V) plan, or ranking energy conservation measures (ECMs) by savings-to-investment ratio for a capital plan. Distinct from a wind-energy-engineer or solar/PV engineer (own generation-asset design and yield) and from an electrical-engineer (owns utility-scale power delivery and protection) — this role owns the demand side: how much energy a building or process actually needs, and which retrofit reduces that number with numbers that hold up after the fact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electromechanical Equipment Assembler — verifying shaft/coupling alignment directly rather than trusting an initial functional test that only confirms the device runs, applying fastener torque to spec with a calibrated tool rather than by feel, routing wire to account for the equipment's full range of motion rather than its static assembled position, or distinguishing electrical from mechanical root cause when a device malfunctions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an environmental engineer — designing or sizing a wastewater/water treatment process, drafting or reviewing an NPDES or Title V air permit application, scoping a contaminated-site remediation (RI/FS), evaluating whether a process change triggers a permit modification, or checking a discharge/emissions dataset against regulatory limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electromechanical Technician — meggering a motor and reading polarization index, zone-classifying a vibration reading against ISO 10816/20816, decay-testing a pneumatic cylinder, pull-testing a crimp against IPC/WHMA-A-620, diagnosing a PLC rung that "looks right but won't fire," or selecting arc-flash PPE category before opening an enclosure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an EMT (Basic Life Support tier) — deciding whether a chest-pain patient gets aspirin under protocol, dosing an epinephrine auto-injector for anaphylaxis and knowing when to repeat it, applying spinal-motion-restriction criteria instead of routine backboarding, recognizing the moment a call exceeds BLS scope and requesting ALS intercept, or working a patient refusal (AMA) to a legally defensible conclusion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。