「regulation」の検索結果

ADHD-friendly life management assistant for OpenClaw. Helps with daily planning, task breakdown, time management, prioritization, body doubling, dopamine regulation, and maintaining routines. Use when the user asks for help organizing their life, staying on top of tasks, beating procrastination, planning their day/week, managing overwhelm, or mentions ADHD-related challenges like time blindness, forgetfulness, difficulty starting tasks, or emotional dysregulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

欧盟 AI 法案知识引擎——以 70 份官方欧盟来源文件为基础的权威监管问答（包括 2026 年委员会关于 Art. 6 高风险分类的指南草稿——一般原则、附件 I、附件 III）。基于完整条例文本、委员会指南、EDPB/EDPS 意见、《实践守则》、协调标准、FRIA 指南、事件模板和行业特定指引，以条款级引用回答关于 AI 法案的任何问题。当用户询问"EU AI Act"、"AI Act regulation"、"Regulation 2024/1689"、"KI-Verordnung"、要求"explain an AI Act article"、"what does Article X say"、"AI Act requirements"、"AI Act penalties"、"AI Act timeline"、"GPAI obligations"、"high-risk AI"、"prohibited AI practices"、"AI Act and GDPR"、"fundamental rights impact assessment"、"AI Act standards"、"AI Act national implementation"、"AI literacy"、"serious incident reporting"、"Digital Omnibus"、"AI regulatory sandbox"，或任何关于欧盟人工智能监管的问题时，应使用本技能。德语术语同样触发："KI-Gesetz"、"KI-Verordnung"、"Hochrisiko-KI"、"KI-Kompetenz"、"Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung"、"GPAI-Verhaltenskodex"。对于产出分类决定而非知识答案的评估工作流，提议在会话内运行结构化风险等级分类。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a draft controls and gap pack from a requirement, regulation, standard or policy and the organisation's control descriptions: obligations broken out of the source text, the controls that appear to address each, apparent coverage, gaps, questions for control owners and actions to assess. Never concludes compliance or that a control is effective; owners and audit assess. Use when the user asks to "map this regulation to our controls", "run a controls gap analysis", "break this standard into obligations" or "where is our control coverage thin". Do not use for comparing a policy document against a standard, use policy-gap-review instead; to draft evidence requests from the mapped controls, use control-evidence-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares one policy against one requirement set (standard, regulation, contract schedule or customer requirement) clause by clause and returns a draft gap review: each requirement element, the policy clause that appears to address it, an apparent match state, and every gap as a question with the clause reference on both sides. Never concludes that the policy complies; the owner decides. Use when the user asks to "gap our policy against the standard", "map this policy to the regulation clause by clause", "check the security policy against the customer's contract schedule", "compare our policy with the new edition" or "where does our policy fall short of the requirements". Do not use for mapping a requirement to the operating controls that implement it, use controls-gap-pack instead; for what a regulatory change means for the organisation, use regulatory-change-impact-note. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns the text of a regulatory change (new regulation, amendment, rule, guidance or standard revision) into a DRAFT impact note: what changed against the prior text where supplied, who is affected as the text scopes it, an obligations table with dates and owners to confirm, and open interpretation questions for legal. States only what the text says; the rest is UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "brief legal on this new regulation", "list what we must do by when under this amendment", "compare the new standard with the version it replaces", "turn this directive into an obligations table" or "what does this rule mean for us". Do not use for assessing existing controls against a requirement set, use controls-gap-pack instead; for gapping a policy against a standard, use policy-gap-review. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) is the EU's comprehensive data protection law governing the collection, processing, storage, and transfer of personal data. This skill cover

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The live fieldwork layer for psycho-logic — go look at the actual target market NOW instead of reasoning from your training-data stereotype of it. Use when a psycho-logic move needs grounding in a specific place: the user asks 'what do competitors in [region/country] actually do', 'what's the real price band / norm here', 'how do local leaders position themselves', 'research this market before we localise', 'what signals trust to buyers in X', or is about to launch/adapt in a market you haven't studied. Runs structured web research in the local language — local competitors and their signals, price bands, category conventions, review/trust sources, local terminology, taboos and regulations — and synthesises a compact perception profile the four moves consume. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic; pair with cultural-context (the lens that tells you what to look for). 日本語・中文の相談（「現地の実態を調べて」「调研当地市场」）にも使う。

Use this skill when the user asks anything that touches US Department of Transportation (DOT) or Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) regulation for commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) — including who's regulated, MC vs DOT number differences, operating authority, BOC-3 process agents, MCS-150 biennial updates, intrastate vs interstate distinctions, exemptions, or pointing to the right CFR section. Cite the actual regulation when answering. Don't guess; if you're not sure which Part applies, ask the user to clarify the operation type (for-hire vs private, passenger vs property, intra vs interstate, hazmat, gross weight rating).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a compliance check on a proposed action, product feature, or business initiative, surfacing applicable regulations, required approvals, and risk areas. Use when launching a feature that touches personal data, when marketing or product proposes something with regulatory implications, or when you need to know which approvals and jurisdictional requirements apply before proceeding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) operational compliance for compliance teams. Three Article-level decisions: (1) What's the risk tier of this AI system — prohibited (Art. 5), high-risk (Art. 6 + Annex III), limited-risk (Art. 50), or minimal-risk? (2) For high-risk systems, what's the Article 43 conformity assessment route (Module A internal control vs Module H full QMS + notified body) and what goes in the Annex IV technical documentation? (3) Per organizational role (provider / deployer / importer / distributor / authorized representative), what are the active obligations and deadlines? Use during AI system intake review, when planning conformity assessment, or when scoping deployer obligations. Cites Articles + Annexes for every output. NOT executive AI strategy (see chief-ai-officer-advisor). NOT a legal substitute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legal document drafting -- contracts, memos, briefs, complaints, demand letters, opinions, discovery, settlements, ToS, privacy policies. Full pipeline: document structure, per-section writing, Bluebook citation, case law lookup (CourtListener API), regulation lookup (eCFR API), DOCX output, and TDD-style verification (defined terms, cross-references, placeholders, boilerplate, citation format). Triggers on: 'draft a contract', 'write a legal memo', 'create an NDA', 'write a brief', 'legal document about', 'draft a complaint', 'terms of service', 'privacy policy', 'demand letter', 'settlement agreement', 'legal opinion', 'discovery requests', any request to produce a legal or law-related document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh Claude Ads platform, API, policy, regulation, benchmark, issue, pull-request, fork, and repository evidence. Use for ads research refresh, expired refresh_due dates, stale API or platform claims, reverify-or-demote decisions, release-current claim validation, ecosystem review, current platform changes, or updating paid-media knowledge. When tools or sources are unavailable, still demote the stale claim for the current run and block dependent release-current assertions before requesting access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when researching China market, industry, macro, trade, procurement, listed-company disclosure, regulation, IP, healthcare, logistics, energy, environment, or industrial-operation information using free official sources with no registration, no API key, and no cryptocurrency data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Industry and market research. Market sizing, structure, competition, regulation, supply chains, pricing, M&A. Produces a single compact, source-cited research report with Porter's Five Forces, HHI / CR4, PESTLE, and trade flows. Supports UK, US, EU, Australia, and global scope, with multi-geography comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brainstorm a longlist of benefits and costs for a project. Outputs two clean tables (benefits and costs), each with materiality (H/M/L), a cash flow tag (cash in / cash out / non-cash), a quantification method, and a monetisation method. Supports HMT Green Book, EU Better Regulation Guidelines, World Bank, Asian Development Bank, and the Victorian Treasury High Value High Risk (HVHR) framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cost-benefit analysis. Produces economic NPV and financial NPV side by side, with BCR, optimism bias (with mitigation), Marginal Excess Tax Burden, real-terms rebasing, WELLBY / QALY / VPF wellbeing valuation, sensitivity, switching values, EANC for unequal-life options, validation gate, and a one-line headline verdict (socially worthwhile vs financially self-sustaining). Backed by the greenbook R package (HM Treasury Green Book primitives) when available, with graceful fallback. Supports HMT Green Book, EU Better Regulation, World Bank, ADB, and Victorian HVHR. Reads a longlist markdown file directly via --from.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive toolkit for preparing ISO 13485 certification documentation for medical device Quality Management Systems. Use when users need help with ISO 13485 QMS documentation, including (1) conducting gap analysis of existing documentation, (2) creating Quality Manuals, (3) developing required procedures and work instructions, (4) preparing Medical Device Files, (5) understanding ISO 13485 requirements, or (6) identifying missing documentation for medical device certification. Also use when users mention medical device regulations, QMS certification, FDA QMSR, EU MDR, or need help with quality system documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes documents and processes against FINRA, SEC, Federal Reserve, and CFPB regulatory frameworks. Identifies compliance gaps, classifies findings by severity, and recommends remediation. Use when performing compliance audits, regulatory reviews, gap analyses, or verifying policy adherence to financial regulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies which regulations apply and builds the program that keeps you inside them — obligation mapping, controls, monitoring, and responding to regulators. Use this to work out what applies to your business, stand up a compliance program, prepare for a regulatory exam or certification, respond to a finding, or assess exposure before entering a new market.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit medical device technical files against EU MDR 2017/745 regulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when implementing PID control loops for adaptive cruise control, vehicle speed regulation, throttle/brake management, or any feedback control system requiring proportional-integral-derivative control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide when and how your product and communications must (or should) label AI-generated content, and write the disclosure policy — surface-by-surface rules, exact label wording, and the review trigger for regulations like the EU AI Act's transparency obligations. Use when asked 'do we have to label AI content', 'write our AI disclosure policy', 'are we covered for the AI Act', or when marketing/support/product start shipping AI-generated output. Produces a disclosure policy with a per-surface matrix and ready-to-use label copy. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end news-triggered signal composite. Takes any piece of news — an article, LinkedIn post, tweet, announcement, event, trend, regulation, product launch, acquisition, layoff, expansion, or any other public event — and evaluates whether the companies or people mentioned are ICP fits. If yes, identifies the connection between the news and your product, finds the right people to contact, and drafts personalized outreach using the news as the hook. Tool-agnostic. Accepts both company-level and person-level news triggers. AUTO-TRIGGER: Load this composite whenever a user shares a URL (LinkedIn post, article, tweet, blog post) or mentions a company/person they "came across", "saw", or "found" from any external source and asks about relevance, fit, ICP match, or whether to reach out. The user does NOT need to explicitly say "outreach" — any signal evaluation request from an external source triggers this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect allele-specific chromatin accessibility from ATAC-seq using WASP, GATK ASEReadCounter, or RASQUAL. Use when mapping cis-regulatory genetic variants from heterozygous SNPs, separating cis from trans regulation, building chromatin QTL (caQTL) maps, validating GWAS variant function with allelic imbalance, or detecting reference allele mapping bias before downstream analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。