「cause」の検索結果

Analyze construction schedule delays for claims and recovery. Perform time impact analysis, identify delay causes, calculate damages, and document for disputes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze schedule delays, identify causes, and calculate time impacts using delay analysis methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds estimates, quotes, and bids for trades and field-service businesses (HVAC, plumbing, electrical, roofing, landscaping, painting, cleaning, remodeling, general contracting, IT/AV installs). Turns a scope into line items with waste factors, burdened labor, materials, equipment, subs, permits, mobilization, contingency, overhead, profit, and tax, then writes a client-ready xlsx (live formulas) and PDF plus an internal cost sheet, with good/better/best options, add-ons, a payment schedule, exclusions, and assumptions. Use whenever someone asks for a quote, estimate, bid, proposal price, or job price, asks "how much should I charge for this job", wants to check a price or margin on a job, or is confused about markup vs margin. Computes deterministically with a script instead of mental math, because models routinely treat a 30% markup as a 30% margin and drop labor burden, waste, and mobilization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-mortem analysis when a client churns. Takes client history, engagement data, support tickets, usage logs, and exit feedback to produce a comprehensive churn autopsy with root cause classification, timeline of decline, and preventive measures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PL (Project Lead) role sub-skill for incident analysis and process evaluation. Loaded through the pl core routing table, or when the owner explicitly asks for a retrospective or root-cause write-up; NEVER auto-load from ambient context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove that a reported run caused its intended real effect. Walk the executor path from entry to effect, capture one observable per hop, and report a result a no-op could not produce.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before showing the user any substantive GTM deliverable (positioning, value prop, homepage, launch post, pricing, sales script, the brief or roadmap), stress-test it against the standard as an independent critic, because the agent that wrote it is the worst judge of whether it is good. Use as a gate right before presenting work, or when the user asks whether something is actually strong.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a positioning and narrative where the developer is the hero and a real trend is the villain. Use when the messaging describes the product instead of the problem, sounds like every competitor, or has no urgency because nothing is at stake.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform an AI agent into a disciplined software development partner with strong judgment, transparent decisions, proportionate verification, and craftsmanship. Use for software implementation, feature work, bug fixing, refactoring, optimization, migrations, and sustained collaboration inside a codebase. Do not use merely because a task involves an AI agent; use a dedicated agent-design skill when the primary problem is agent architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides privacy audit report writing including executive summary drafting, findings classification (critical, high, medium, low), evidence referencing, root cause analysis documentation, recommendation formulation, management response tracking, and report distribution protocols. Covers report structure from scope definition through appendices and sign-off. Keywords: audit report, findings documentation, executive summary, recommendations, report structure, privacy audit deliverables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Narrative-driven animation skill for explanatory content and visual storytelling. **Triggers when:** - User wants to explain a concept or process - Request involves step-by-step demonstrations - Content is educational or tutorial-like - User mentions "explain", "show how", "demonstrate", "walk through" **Capabilities:** - Breaking concepts into digestible visual steps - Progressive revelation of information - Highlighting cause-and-effect relationships - Building intuition through visual metaphors

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes with code-overview and publishes the resulting overview to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants code or a PR explained, oriented, or made sense of AND the overview posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not produce the overview to a local file only — use code-overview. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not root-cause a bug to Confluence — use investigate-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cut a Han release: update CHANGELOG.md with the changes since the last release, bump and tag every plugin that changed as {plugin-name}--v{version} so a version-constrained dependency can resolve, and publish a GitHub release crediting every merged pull request and closed issue to the people behind it. Use when releasing, cutting a release, shipping a new Han version, publishing release notes, or tagging a version. Always stops for approval before creating any tag, because a pushed tag is never moved. Requires the gh CLI, jq, the claude CLI, and a clean git checkout. This is a repository-maintenance skill for the Han repo itself, not a general review or PR skill — use code-review for local review, post-code-review-to-pr to post a PR review, and update-pr-description for PR bodies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write code through a disciplined, BDD-framed Test-Driven Development loop: build a behavior test list, then drive each behavior through red-green-refactor with an enforced observed-failure gate. Use when the user wants to implement, build, or write code test-first, "do TDD", follow "red-green-refactor", drive code from tests, choose the next test by the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) or ZOMBIES ordering, or grow a feature behavior-by-behavior with tests leading. This skill writes and changes code; it does not produce a test plan document (use automated-test-planning, or manual-test-planning for a plan a person runs by hand), review or audit existing code (use code-review), restructure existing code outside a TDD loop (use refactor, or plan-a-change to plan a multi-module restructure), specify what a feature should do (use plan-a-feature), or find the root cause of a bug (use investigate). Runs its loop to completion without pausing for review; to review each behavior as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs an evidence-based investigation of a bug, failure, or unexpected behavior with investigate and publishes the resulting investigation report to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants something debugged, diagnosed, or root-caused AND the findings posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not investigate to a local file only — use investigate. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route substantial coding or repository-review work through a two-stage Sol commander/verifier and separate Luna Max CLI worker. Use when the user explicitly asks Sol to direct or supervise Luna, explicitly requests this router, needs an isolated auditable Luna-owned implementation with a Sol review loop, or asks to diagnose or measure the router itself. Do not use merely because a task involves coding, verification, progress reporting, or token saving. For small or straightforward tasks, keep work in Sol unless the user explicitly requests Luna; router configuration, usage, and efficiency questions should use read-only inspection without launching a worker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing failures, outages, incidents, or negative outcomes, conducting blameless postmortems, documenting root causes with 5 Whys or fishbone diagrams, identifying corrective actions with owners and timelines, learning from near-misses, establishing prevention strategies, or when user mentions postmortem, incident review, failure analysis, RCA, lessons learned, or after-action review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Flutter home feed / main screen stuck on loading spinner after login when using Riverpod StreamProvider that watches GoRouter location changes. Use when: (1) Screen shows BrandedLoadingIndicator or CircularProgressIndicator permanently after successful auth redirect, (2) Widget watches a route-type-gating provider that returns AsyncValue.loading() intermittently, (3) Logs show route location oscillating between stale and current paths during post-login transition (e.g., /welcome/* after /home/0), (4) Provider chain has double-gate: widget gates on pageContext AND data provider also gates on pageContext. Distinct from riverpod-infinite-rebuild-loop (rapid rebuilds) — this causes permanent loading state, not infinite rebuilds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix SQLite "database disk image is malformed" errors caused by corrupted FTS5 indexes. Use when: (1) UPDATE/INSERT fails with "stepping, database disk image is malformed" but PRAGMA integrity_check returns "ok", (2) Only specific records fail to update while others succeed, (3) Records contain dirty text with tabs, newlines, or unusual characters that were inserted into FTS5-indexed columns. The misleading error message suggests disk corruption, but the actual issue is FTS5 index corruption from malformed text content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Cloudflare Workers Error 1101 "Worker threw exception" caused by Hono sub-app route handlers returning undefined instead of a Response. Use when: (1) Error 1101 on a specific hostname but not others sharing the same worker, (2) "the Promise did not resolve to 'Response'" in wrangler dev logs, (3) Hono sub-app route handler uses bare `return` to skip handling for non-matching hostnames or conditions. The fix is to add `next` parameter and call `return next()` instead of bare `return` in route handlers that conditionally skip.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Monte Carlo project completion simulations that give identical dates for all sub-groups (milestones, priorities, epics). Use when: (1) All sub-group predictions converge to the same date despite different remaining counts, (2) Proportional throughput scaling produces flat/identical results, (3) Applying overall scope rate to individual sub-groups causes simulations to hit max_weeks cap and never converge, (4) Building project forecasting tools that predict completion for sub-groups of a larger backlog. Covers hypergeometric draw model for milestones and cumulative priority model for sequential priorities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。