「project」の検索結果

Proposes the instrumentation and control content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: instruments drawn carried over as facts, measurement points and control loops the control philosophy requires, tag structure per the project instrument numbering procedure, system interfaces, and alarms, interlocks, trips and fail actions as quoted. Never assigns safety functions, ranges or setpoints. Use when the user asks to "run the instrumentation and control enrichment", "add the instrument section to the P&ID draft", "list the control loops the philosophy requires" or "carry the PFD instruments into the P&ID" after the piping section. Do not use for safety flags, SIL or trip classification, use process-safety-flags instead; do not use to assign tag numbers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a project or processing description and returns a DRAFT data protection impact assessment pack: processing description, necessity and proportionality questions, a risk table with blank rating cells, mitigations to consider and open questions. Never rates risk, determines the lawful basis or judges adequacy; the DPO assesses and signs. Works from descriptions, never personal data. Use when the user asks to "start a DPIA for the new monitoring tool", "draft a data protection impact assessment", "scaffold a DPIA from this processing description" or "what would the DPO need for a DPIA on this". Do not use for redacting or de-identifying a document, use document-deidentification-pass instead; do not use for working out what data an incident exposed, use data-incident-impact-brief instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a document transmittal (header, one line per document with revision and purpose of issue, distribution with action required, blank acknowledgement block) from a document list and the project's transmittal template, with UNKNOWN for anything not stated and questions for document control. Never assigns a transmittal number, changes a revision or marks anything issued. Use when the user asks to "draft a transmittal for these documents", "fill in the issue sheet" or "prepare the document issue note". Do not use for checking a register or deliverables list, use master-document-register-check instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesises a batch of customer feedback (survey answers, reviews, ticket and chat comments) into a DRAFT themed report: coded themes with record counts and shares, anonymised verbatim quotes cited to record codes, contradictions and unverified claims, and the follow-up questions to answer next. Produces no sentiment score or percentage positive as fact; ratings appear only as distributions with n. Use when the user asks to "theme this feedback", "what are customers saying", "summarise these survey answers", "analyse these reviews", "find the top complaints in these comments" or "code this voice of the customer data". Do not use for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis instead; for sorting a live queue and drafting replies, use ticket-triage-pack; for project retrospectives, use lessons-learned-synthesis. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes tag and number structures for the new lines and instruments in a P&ID draft according to the project's numbering procedures, checks every tag extracted from the PFD against the quoted procedure format, and lists cross-section identifier mismatches and the registry checks a human must run. Never invents a numbering convention, never alters a PFD tag and never assigns a sequence number the procedure reserves for the registry. Use when the user asks to "run the tagging and numbering section", "check the tags against the numbering procedure", "propose the tag structure for the new lines and instruments" or "list the registry checks before validation" after the process safety flags. Do not use for validating the four sections, use validation-and-review-package instead; do not use for instrument content, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a role-tuned morning brief as a dated Markdown document covering emails that need replies, today's calendar with conflicts flagged, chat mentions and upcoming deadlines, in the section order set by a preset (project manager, executive assistant, IT admin, sales or custom) read from an editable config. Use when the user asks to "run my brief", "give me my morning brief", "start-of-day summary", "switch my brief to the sales preset" or "change what my brief covers". Do not use for tracking promises made or owed across days, use commitment-catcher instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

文章・主張・論証・レポート・メール・仕様などが「論理として通っているか」と「日本語として明快か」を最小手数で点検する。「これ論理的？」「ロジックチェックして」「論証の穴を探して」「主張と根拠は合ってる？」「この説明が分かりにくい」「文章を簡潔にして」「テクニカルライティングとして直して」といった依頼で必ず使う。「この文章、翻訳っぽい／直訳調／訳語臭い／英語をそのまま訳したみたい／不自然な日本語」「カルクを直して」も必ず拾う。表記ゆれ・用語のゆれ・敬体常体の混在・文体の乱れも見る。下書きの推敲、議論の検証、説明文・仕様・提案の改善でも起動すること。

日本語の文章・メール・レポート・仕様・ドキュメントが「日本語として明快か（簡潔・明快・誤解されない）」を最小手数で点検する。「この説明が分かりにくい」「文章を簡潔にして」「読みにくい」「日本語を整えて」「テクニカルライティングとして直して」といった依頼で必ず使う。「この文章、翻訳っぽい／直訳調／訳語臭い／英語をそのまま訳したみたい／不自然な日本語」「カルクを直して」も必ず拾う。表記ゆれ・用語のゆれ・敬体常体の混在・文体の乱れも見る。下書きの推敲、説明文・仕様・提案の文章改善でも起動すること。（論理・論証の妥当性もまとめて見るなら logic-jp-check を使う。）

Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Use when asked to "simplify code", "clean up code", "refactor for clarity", "improve readability", or review recently modified code for elegance. Focuses on project-specific best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes changes since last release and drafts them directly into the project's CHANGELOG.md. Use when users requests 'update the changelog' or 'prepare changelog release notes'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate Jira Cloud via its REST v3 API — issues, projects, sprints, boards, comments, transitions, JQL search. Use when the user wants to triage, bulk-update, report on, or otherwise interact with Jira programmatically without the MCP server installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query and mutate Linear issues, projects, cycles, teams, workflow states, and comments via its GraphQL API. Use when the user wants to read or change Linear data programmatically — without the MCP server, and without hand-navigating the Linear UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Vercel deployments, projects, environment variables, domains, DNS, and build/runtime logs via REST API. Use when the user wants to deploy, check a deploy status, rotate env vars, attach custom domains, or investigate failed builds without the Vercel MCP installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage n8n workflow automation via its public REST API — list/get/create/update workflows, activate/deactivate, inspect execution history, retry/stop executions, manage credentials, tags, variables, users, and projects. Works with self-hosted n8n and n8n Cloud. Use when the user wants programmatic access to their n8n instance without the n8n MCP installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query Sentry issues, events, releases, replays, and org/project metadata via REST API. Use when the user wants to diagnose a production error, pull stack traces, list recent issues, inspect a release, or fetch event data programmatically — prefer this over asking for UI screenshots or guessing from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FastAPI service setup: app/main.py, API routers, pydantic-settings, lifespan/app.state services, middleware, health checks, pytest/TestClient, Uvicorn, Gunicorn/uvicorn-worker, Docker/Compose. Use for scaffolding or modernizing Python API services; skip for Flask/Django-only, frontend-only, non-Python APIs, or Supabase-specific work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weave a new node (concept, framework, theory, project, principle) into the whole vault graph rather than just creating a note. Mode A links one new node against the vault by top-K retrieval, with the LLM judging only those candidates; mode --deep finds orphaned islands and wires them in. Backup before edits, preview before writing. Triggers: "/relink", "integrate this concept".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after substantial web projects or repeated design defects to convert evidence into reusable skill improvements through root-cause analysis, regression scenarios, and controlled proposals without silently changing the core OS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a web project needs business goals, audience, information architecture, conversion priorities, content hierarchy, constraints, or design CTQs clarified before visual design begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a web project needs animation or motion-tool selection across native CSS/WAAPI/View Transitions, Motion, Anime.js, GSAP, Lenis, scroll choreography, SVG/text animation, or synchronized motion systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a BACKPRESSURE.md file for any project. Analyzes codebase and PRD to produce deterministic self-verification checks that AI coding agents run on their own output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when contributing to the CopilotKit open-source project — forking, cloning, setting up the monorepo, creating branches, running tests, and submitting pull requests against CopilotKit/CopilotKit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DEPRECATED: This skill has been replaced by `mcp-app-builder`. Check if `mcp-app-builder` is available in the skills folder. If not, install it: `npx skills install mcp-use/mcp-use --skill mcp-app-builder` Use `mcp-app-builder` instead of this skill. Build Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers with mcp-use framework. Use when creating MCP servers, defining tools/resources/prompts, working with mcp-use, bootstrapping MCP projects, or when user mentions MCP development, tools, resources, or prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。