「20」の検索結果

MATLAB R2026a and Simulink workflow for creating, inspecting, modifying, simulating, validating, and exporting .slx models. Use for Simulink, Stateflow, Simscape, model-based design, parameter sweeps, signal logging, requirements, and simulation automation. On this machine, Simulink tasks should be visual-first: open the model in a visible Simulink window before doing substantial automated modeling or simulation so the user can watch the process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MATLAB R2026a workflow for signal processing, DSP, image processing, computer vision, lidar, medical imaging, deep learning, and AI-assisted reproducible experiments. Use for filters, spectrograms, wavelets, object detection, segmentation, classification, training, inference, and generated figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MATLAB R2026a agentic workflow router. Use this whenever the user asks for MATLAB, Simulink, .m/.mlx/.slx work, toolbox-driven engineering, paper reproduction, simulation, code generation, data analysis, control, robotics, signal/image/AI workflows, or wants an end-to-end automated MATLAB task with validation. For Simulink tasks on this machine, default to a visible workflow: open MATLAB/Simulink windows first so the user can watch modeling, simulation, tuning, and plotting progress.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MATLAB R2026a robotics and autonomy workflow for ROS Toolbox, Robotics System Toolbox, Navigation Toolbox, UAV Toolbox, sensor fusion, trajectory planning, simulation, and reproducible robot experiments. Use for ROS/ROS 2 bags, robot models, path planning, SLAM, state estimation, and autonomy prototyping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MATLAB R2026a data analysis workflow for tables, timetables, statistics, fitting, optimization-assisted analysis, visualization, report artifacts, and reproducible paper figures. Use whenever the user asks MATLAB to analyze data, plot results, fit models, process CSV/Excel/MAT files, or reproduce figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run MATLAB R2026a tasks from Codex with reliable MCP-based execution, logs, artifacts, toolbox inventory, smoke tests, and reproducible validation. Use whenever MATLAB code, .m/.mlx scripts, MATLAB tests, local toolbox probing, or command-line automation is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI governance audit using ISO 42001 standard. Ensures AI systems are developed and deployed responsibly with risk management, ethics, security, transparency, and compliance best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

APSA style checker for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks numbers, capitalization, abbreviations, italics, in-text citations, titles of works, neutral and unbiased language, and APSA-specific terminology against the APSA Style Manual for Political Science (2018, updated 2023). Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to check APSA style, fix citations, review capitalization, check number formatting, or flag biased language in a .qmd document. For grammar, spelling, and punctuation, use the proofread skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Enterprise risk management (ERM) framework layer — integrates COSO ERM 2017 (five components, 20 principles), ISO 31000, three-lines model, risk appetite, risk heatmap, and key risk indicators (KRI) into a complete governance playbook covering structure through culture. Use for ERM implementation, risk-system build, risk mapping, risk-appetite statement drafting, three-lines setup, CRO role design, or Taiwan FSC corporate-governance evaluation response. Triggers: 『ERM 導入』『風險管理框架』『COSO』『風險地圖』『風險胃納』『KRI』『CRO 職責』『三道防線』『風險委員會』『ISO 31000』『風險熱圖』『風險治理』. For 師大／政大／陽交 EMBA risk-management/governance/audit cases. Complements Asgard `algo-risk-*` (Altman Z, Benford, credit, VaR) with the framework/governance layer. 獨董挑選/董事會組成/IPO 治理: use `biz-corporate-governance`.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitate and document Sprint Retrospectives per Scrum Guide 2020. Choose format by team maturity, structure the session, capture action items, and track improvement across sprints. Use after every sprint. Do not use for individual performance reviews, blame sessions, or annual assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI/LLM red-team assessment using the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) + OWASP AI Testing Guide (AITG v1, Nov 2025) frameworks, plus OWASP MCP Top 10 runtime testing for agentic/MCP targets. Tests prompt injection, jailbreaks, system prompt leakage, sensitive data extraction, excessive agency, improper output handling, model extraction, content bias, evasion, membership inference, MCP token exposure, MCP command injection, and more. Uses four tools in combination: FuzzyAI (single-turn jailbreak fuzzing), PyRIT (multi-turn orchestrated attacks), Garak (probe-based vulnerability scanning), and promptfoo (plugin-based red-team evaluation). Each tool covers different OWASP categories; running them together gives systematic coverage. Includes a conditional MCP reconnaissance phase and a post-access AI infrastructure phase (chained from /post-exploit). Produces: OWASP LLM Top 10 + AITG + MCP coverage matrix, findings per category, architecture diagram of the AI system, PoCs for confirmed exploits. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5-level verification pyramid: static→unit→Playwright E2E (homepage-first, 6bp)→AI visual→post-deploy. 8-check quality gate. Multi-agent testing (functional/security/a11y/performance). Playwright v1.56+ AI agents (Planner/Generator/Healer, v1.63 current). WCAG 2.2 AA via axe-core v4.13. Percy+Chromatic visual regression. ADA Title II 2027/2028 deadlines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern native JavaScript (ES2022-ES2025) utility patterns that replace lodash

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire or the AI annex buyers now attach to it, executing sales sequences, coaching qualification, or deciding what the website's AI chat agent is allowed to say. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, reply handling, reply classification, out-of-office replies, auto-replies counted as replies, our reply rate is inflated, prospect replied remove me, opt-out by reply, is this list ready to send, launch readiness, CRM segment outbound, we emailed a current customer, outbound hit an open opportunity, ownerless leads, prospects engaging our competitors, competitor connections, displacement list, is this personalization creepy, can we mention they visited our site, signal freshness, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, objection handling, common objections, why do we keep hearing this objection, mine call transcripts for objections, objection register, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, AI security questionnaire, AI annex, AI vendor due diligence, the buyer is asking if we train on their data, do you train on customer data, which model do you use, model provider sub-processor, AI subprocessor disclosure, where does inference run, can the customer turn the AI feature off, AI-CAIQ, CSA AI Controls Matrix, ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Article 50, are we a provider or a deployer, AI feature disclosure, our model vendor changed and nobody told the buyer, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss, website chatbot, chat widget, AI chat agent, AI SDR, inbound AI SDR, conversational marketing, live chat, what should our chatbot be allowed to say, our chatbot quoted the wrong price, the bot promised a discount, do we have to disclose it is AI, EU AI Act chatbot disclosure, chatbot handoff to sales, chat transcript review, prompt injection on our chatbot, Drift, Qualified, Intercom.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electromechanical Technician — meggering a motor and reading polarization index, zone-classifying a vibration reading against ISO 10816/20816, decay-testing a pneumatic cylinder, pull-testing a crimp against IPC/WHMA-A-620, diagnosing a PLC rung that "looks right but won't fire," or selecting arc-flash PPE category before opening an enclosure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive 2026 SEO audit covering classic technical SEO (crawl, render, index, Core Web Vitals with INP), on-page (titles, meta, headings, internal linking), content (topical authority, entity density).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

為使用者產生高品質的 AI 生圖、生影片、生音樂提示詞，並在需要時透過瀏覽器自動化實際送到目標平台。涵蓋 OiiOii、Kling 3.0/O-series、Seedance 2.0/2.5、Suno v5.5、Seedream 5.0/4.0、Vidu Q3、Midjourney V8.1、Flux 1.1 Pro / Kontext、Runway Gen-4.5 / Aleph、Google Veo 3.1、Ideogram 3、Nano Banana Pro、Stable Diffusion 3.5（⚠️ OpenAI Sora 2 已於 2026-04-26 停運，API 撐到 2026-09-24，預設改推 Runway/Veo/Kling）。只要使用者提到「AI 生圖」「AI 影片」「AI 音樂」「做 MV」「做 storyboard」「寫 prompt 給 XXX」「我想用 Kling/Suno/Midjourney/Runway/Veo...」「幫我操作 OiiOii / 即夢 / 可靈」「txt2img / img2video / 文生圖 / 文生影片 / 圖生影片」「角色一致性」「多鏡頭分鏡」「運鏡」「結果有瑕疵 / 不夠精緻 / 怎麼修」，或任何跟上述平台或影像/影片/音樂生成工作流相關的任務，都要用這個 skill。即使他們沒講明平台，只要任務是要餵給某個生成模型的 prompt，就用這個 skill 幫他們選對的平台、寫對的格式。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Firmware development for the WeAct Studio RP2350A Core Board (RP2350A — dual Cortex-M33 @ 150 MHz, 520 KB SRAM, 4 MB or 16 MB QSPI flash) in both of its revisions, RP2350A_V10 and RP2350A_V20 — the 40-pin Pico-2-shaped header, 3-or-4-channel 12-bit ADC, PWM, PIO, USB-C CDC, the V1.0 LDO vs V2.0 buck-boost power wiring, and the PlatformIO + arduino-pico (earlephilhower) setup around them. Use when working on this board, a WeAct RP2350 core board of unknown revision, or any Raspberry Pi Pico 2 / RP2350A clone: project setup, platformio.ini, board = rpipico2 vs weact_rp2350b, telling V1.0 and V2.0 apart, pin mapping, LED and KEY pins, powering it from a battery, 4 MB vs 16 MB flash, erratum RP2350-E9 pull-down trouble, BOOT/RESET UF2 flashing, or debugging why something on the board does not work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies missing tests for critical paths (Money 20+, Security 20+, Data Integrity 15+, Core Flows 15+). Returns list of untested critical business logic with priority justification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect AI agents to the 2020117 decentralized network. Register, post to timeline, trade compute via NIP-90 DVM jobs (text generation, translation, summarization, image/video/speech), pay with Lightning, build reputation through Nostr zaps and Web of Trust. Use when building or operating AI agents that need to communicate, exchange capabilities, or transact on an open protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts code-compliant California responses to Requests for Production (CCP § 2031.010 et seq.) for Superior Court. Use when the user mentions California RFP responses, CCP 2031, discovery objections, compliance statements, inability to comply, privilege objections, Bates numbering, verification requirements, or responding to document requests in California state court. California Superior Court only — not for federal court without substantial modification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

欧盟 AI 法案知识引擎——以 70 份官方欧盟来源文件为基础的权威监管问答（包括 2026 年委员会关于 Art. 6 高风险分类的指南草稿——一般原则、附件 I、附件 III）。基于完整条例文本、委员会指南、EDPB/EDPS 意见、《实践守则》、协调标准、FRIA 指南、事件模板和行业特定指引，以条款级引用回答关于 AI 法案的任何问题。当用户询问"EU AI Act"、"AI Act regulation"、"Regulation 2024/1689"、"KI-Verordnung"、要求"explain an AI Act article"、"what does Article X say"、"AI Act requirements"、"AI Act penalties"、"AI Act timeline"、"GPAI obligations"、"high-risk AI"、"prohibited AI practices"、"AI Act and GDPR"、"fundamental rights impact assessment"、"AI Act standards"、"AI Act national implementation"、"AI literacy"、"serious incident reporting"、"Digital Omnibus"、"AI regulatory sandbox"，或任何关于欧盟人工智能监管的问题时，应使用本技能。德语术语同样触发："KI-Gesetz"、"KI-Verordnung"、"Hochrisiko-KI"、"KI-Kompetenz"、"Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung"、"GPAI-Verhaltenskodex"。对于产出分类决定而非知识答案的评估工作流，提议在会话内运行结构化风险等级分类。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI compliance analysis for EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, OECD, financial services regulations (SEC, FCA, FINRA, DORA, MiFID II), and other frameworks. Use when asked to generate a compliance checklist for an AI tool or use case, determine if a risk assessment is required, score an AI tool's risk level, identify where an AI tool or use case could run afoul of regulatory requirements, perform a gap analysis, recommend remediation steps, assess a vendor, draft an acceptable use policy, map training requirements, or review jurisdiction-specific AI rules. Triggers on phrases like "compliance checklist", "risk assessment", "risk score", "does this comply", "EU AI Act", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF", "AI governance", "gap analysis", "vendor assessment", "acceptable use policy", "MNPI", "AI training requirements", or any request to evaluate an AI tool or use case for regulatory compliance or risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

基于《广告法》第11条及2026年第20号公告《广告引证内容执法指南》（正式版），对广告文案引证内容执行六维度28条规则合规审查，输出结构化风险报告。输入广告文案文本，即可自动完成引证提取→规则匹配→风险定级→报告生成全流程。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。