「thinking」の検索結果

Guia completo para usar Claude Code de forma eficaz. Inclui templates de configuração, estratégias de prompting com keywords "Thinking", técnicas de debugging e melhores práticas para interagir com o agente.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[AI & Tools] Use when you need to apply structured, reflective problem-solving for complex tasks requiring multi-step analysis, revision capability, and hypothesis verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack canary method for staged release thinking, smoke gates, rollout checks, and rollback signals before or after deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stress-test plans before committing by imagining they've already failed. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full pre-mortem session — vivid failure scene-setting, six failure categories, the monkey test, and concrete plan adjustments. Review mode checks previous findings monthly for changed probabilities and new failure modes. Alert Triggers mode defines and monitors early warning signals across four trigger categories. Use before any major commitment — strategy, investment, product launch, partnership — or regularly to keep assumptions honest. The planning fallacy is real. The spreadsheet looked great so everyone stopped thinking. This is the antidote. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Eterdis Strategy Diagnostic — an AI-guided conversation that helps leadership teams understand their strategic situation before committing to a direction. This is the entry point skill. It runs an open-ended discovery conversation, detects which strategic frameworks are most relevant, and produces a strategy-ready brief. Use this skill when someone asks for a general strategic assessment, when they don't know which framework they need, when they want to "figure out where we stand," or when they're preparing for a strategy engagement. This skill orchestrates other Eterdis skills — it does not replace them. Triggers on: "help me think through our strategy," "where should we start," "we need to figure out what's going on," "strategic health check," "prepare for a strategy review," or any open-ended request for strategic thinking. Based on 20 years of consulting practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Competitive positioning diagnostic — figures out where you actually stand relative to competitors and whether that position is defensible. Use this skill when someone needs to understand their real competitive position (not the one on the slide deck), when a new competitor has entered the market, when customers are switching and nobody can explain why, when pricing power is eroding, when a strategic investment depends on knowing whether the moat is real, or when leadership says "we're differentiated" but can't explain how. Draws on Playing to Win, Porter's generic strategies, and Blue Ocean thinking — applied as diagnosis, not planning. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when work needs deeper thinking, less generic output, repo evidence, tradeoffs, monitoring signals, or stronger quality discipline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start a working doc — a drafting space where spec-level and implementation thinking co-exist before splitting into specs, plan, and test cases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explicit-only interview loop for stress-testing a plan, decision, or idea. Use only when the user asks to grill, interrogate, interview, or stress-test their thinking before action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fableクラスの思考プロセスを任意のモデルで再現する思考スキャフォールド。問いの再構築、 前提の検証、選択肢空間の展開、反証、確信度つきの収束という順序をフェーズとゲートで強制する。 設計判断・技術選定・調査・分析・提案など、結論を間違えるコストが高い非自明なタスクで使用。 「深く考えて」「幅広い視野で」「多角的に検討して」「Fableのように考えて」がトリガー。 Use when asked to think deeply, consider all angles, or for high-stakes decisions and analyses.

Lateral-thinking playbook that always returns a five-tier strategy portfolio (Quick Win through Moonshot). Use when you need options, alternatives, or trade-offs; when progress is stalled or failing repeatedly; or when you ask to think creatively, reframe constraints, and choose a strategic path before execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base synthesized from the Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK) v2.14 by the BKCASE Project. Use for the established systems-engineering canon: SE fundamentals and foundations (systems science, systems thinking, the systems approach, modelling/MBSE), the life cycle (ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288/24748/24774 process, development & agile approaches, model selection/tailoring), technical management, concept definition, architecture/realization (the Vee), V&V, maintenance/sustainment, SE standards, and the application contexts (product, service, enterprise, systems-of-systems, healthcare), plus enabling SE (business/team/individual), related disciplines, quality attributes/specialty engineering, implementation examples, and emerging knowledge. Good for grounding background, vocabulary, and prior-art positions across all eight SEBoK Parts. SCOPE LIMITS: this pack is SEBoK v2.14 only (released 2026-05-18); it synthesizes and signposts rather than reproducing the source — it does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE standard text, is a curated guide (not a complete textbook), and is thin on AI-integration depth (Part 8 is a staging area, not settled practice). LICENCE: content is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 — non-commercial use only, attribution to the BKCASE Project required, share-alike obligations carry forward.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from DAFMAN 63-119 (15 April 2021), Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification. Use for continuous MOTRC replacing single-point OTRR thinking: framework/applicability, Certification Official vs PM roles, review cycle and exit criteria, certification memo/decertify gates, DT&E/contractor evidence, ITT integration and cyber resiliency, and the 31-template matrix. DAF T&E readiness process only—does not replace DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, or multi-service lead policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrase -- including German ones such as "grill mich", "grill mich zu diesem Plan" or "zerpflück meinen Plan im Grill-Modus". Entry point for the /grill-me command; can also be invoked directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured creativity methods for idea generation: SCAMPER, Six Thinking Hats, Mind Mapping, Reverse Brainstorming, TRIZ, and Rapid Ideation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

変更に含まれる設計判断・実装選択の論理的整合性を徹底的に検証し、確証バイアスを排除して判断精度を高める

Apply before writing logic: choosing core types and data structures, sequencing scaffold-vs-feature work, asking what concurrent actors share. Get the data structures right so downstream code becomes obvious.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master guide for using Claude Code effectively. Includes configuration templates, prompting strategies \"Thinking\" keywords, debugging techniques, and best practices for interacting wit...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production deployment principles and decision-making. Safe deployment workflows, rollback strategies, and verification. Teaches thinking, not scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured methodology for adversarial thinking — generating attack scenarios, abuse cases, race conditions, and security edge cases against specs and implementations. Produces spec-level gap items, not code-level fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use at the end of every important response. Save your decision-making thoughts as a signed A2A insight so they become training data for future fine-tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design philosophy docs and canvas-based visual creation. Use when articulating design principles, crafting multi-page design documents, or exploring aesthetic philosophy with intentional design thinking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Extended thinking: This workflow implements a sophisticated debugging and resolution pipeline that leverages AI-assisted debugging tools and observability platforms to systematically diagnose and res

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。