「assess」の検索結果

サービスの健全性や遅延、処理量、リソース不足を把握するために、運用上の疑問から指標を選び、GrafanaやSigNoz向けの監視ダッシュボードを作ります。

• Kafkaの監視画面を作りたいとき
• Elasticsearchの状態や性能の監視
• API gatewayの遅延やエラーの監視

Webページの表示や操作、APIの応答、ビルド・テストの所要時間を計測するスキル。変更前後の結果を比較し、Gitで共有する基準値をもとに性能の悪化を確認します。

• コード変更前後の性能比較
• ページが遅いという報告の調査
• 公開前に性能目標を確認したいとき

採点済みの競合情報を、市場マップや比較表、差別化の余地、優先施策を含むレポートにまとめます。経営層への報告や、チームで競争方針を決める場面に役立ちます。

• 経営層や取締役会向けの競合報告
• 完成済み競合プロフィールの統合
• 差別化の余地と競合脅威の検討

AIエージェントが実装の多くを担う開発チーム向けに、計画、責任分担、レビュー基準、テスト要件を整理し、生成コードを扱う開発プロセスを設計するスキル。

• AI生成コードを扱う開発ルールの整備
• コードレビュー基準と承認条件の設定
• エージェントが作業しやすい設計の検討

言語モデル内部の反応を少数の特徴に分解し、学習した概念を調べます。学習済みSAEの分析、自作SAEの訓練、特徴を使った出力調整と品質評価を案内します。

• 学習済みSAEで特徴を調べたいとき
• 特定のモデル層にSAEを訓練する
• 入力文ごとの特徴の反応を比較する

Hardens code against vulnerabilities. Use when auditing an input handler for vulnerabilities, when handling user input, authentication, data storage, or external integrations, or when checking a login flow is safe against the OWASP Top Ten. Use when building any feature that accepts untrusted data, manages user sessions, or interacts with third-party services. Use when auditing dependencies for known vulnerabilities, triaging package-manager audit findings, or assessing supply-chain risk in a new package. Use when personal data or privacy compliance (GDPR, CCPA) is involved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI creative director with recursive self-assessment: 20+ methodologies (SIT, TRIZ, Bisociation, SCAMPER, Synectics), 3-axis evaluation calibrated against Cannes/D&AD/HumanKind, 5-phase process from brief to presentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run RuView sensing applications — presence/occupancy, breathing & heart rate, activity & fall detection, 17-keypoint pose estimation (WiFlow), sleep monitoring & apnea screening, environment mapping, Mass Casualty Assessment (MAT), and the 3D point-cloud fusion demo. Use when someone wants to actually *do* something with a working RuView setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open the WorldMonitor country interface in a UI-capable MCP host. Use the text assessment endpoint for explicit text-only requests or clients without embedded UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Model oil or gas supply shock exposure for a country and chokepoint. Use when the user asks how an energy disruption could affect fuel supply, strategic cover, or product deficits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs, uploaded PDFs, arXiv links, or requests like "review this paper", "analyze this research", "summarize this study", or "write a peer review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and carry out non-trivial software-system changes from first principles. Use when assessing RFCs, issues, designs, features, refactors, migrations, dependency changes, or proposed fields, events, APIs, modules, and services whose need, consumers, system fit, validation, or rollback require scrutiny. Read the actual system, identify the concrete problem and named semantic consumers, choose the smallest sufficient solution, reject pseudo-requirements and speculative abstractions, and require evidence proportional to risk. Do not use for mechanical edits, source-code explanation, or a dedicated review of an already-complete diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Archify issues, PRs, or code through value, cost, and impact to support evidence-based maintenance decisions. Use for issue triage, change reviews, and code quality assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Issue triage: audit open issues, categorize, detect duplicates, cross-ref PRs, risk assessment, post comments. Args: "all" for deep analysis of all, issue numbers to focus (e.g. "42 57"), "en"/"fr" for language, no arg = audit only in French.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess portfolio risk using npx neural-trader — VaR, CVaR, Sharpe, position sizing, circuit breaker status

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git diffs for risk scoring, reviewer recommendations, and change classification. Use when preparing a PR, reviewing a large or cross-module change, or before merging to assess risk and pick reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Thorough, file-cited technical debt audit across 9 dimensions using AST-grep (tree-sitter), grep, LSP, and language-native tooling. Produces TECH_DEBT_AUDIT.md with severity, effort estimates, and prioritized fixes. Use when asked for codebase health check, tech debt audit, architecture review, code quality assessment, or cleanup planning. Triggers: 'tech debt', 'technical debt', 'debt audit', 'code health', 'technical debt audit', 'codebase health check', 'find tech debt', 'debt analysis', 'audit code quality'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Application security testing (AppSec) across a whole product with Strix — decide which asset needs which test (source code, running web app, API, CI pipeline), run it, and turn the results into a ranked remediation plan. Autonomous agents exploit and prove each issue instead of emitting static-analysis alerts, so the plan is ordered by what is actually reachable. Use when the user asks for an application security review or audit, an appsec assessment, vulnerability scanning across their stack, a security review before a launch or a customer security questionnaire, or does not yet know which kind of security test they need.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test an application against the OWASP Top 10 with Strix — autonomous AI agents that attempt real exploits for each category of the current OWASP Top 10:2025 (broken access control including SSRF, security misconfiguration, software supply chain failures, cryptographic failures, injection, insecure design, authentication failures, integrity failures, logging and alerting failures, mishandling of exceptional conditions) and report only what they could actually prove, mapped back to the category with a proof-of-concept. Also covers the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023). Use when the user asks for an OWASP Top 10 assessment, OWASP compliance testing, or a security review mapped to OWASP categories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits Appwrite blog posts for SEO, AEO, content structure, links, metadata, and search intent. Use when the user asks for an SEO audit, SEO review, search optimization check, or pre-publishing SEO assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess the impact of a significant change during sprint execution across the PRD, epics, architecture, and UX documents, and produce a sprint change proposal. Use when the user says "correct course" or "propose sprint change"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, WHY HOW WHAT papers, 3W literature scan, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 三段式文獻掃描, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題, 심층 연구, 문헌 조사, 체계적 문헌고찰, 메타분석, 사실 확인, 연구 방향을 잡아줘, 연구 주제 정하는 것을 도와줘, revisión de literatura, metaanálisis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정, revisar artículo, revisión entre pares, revisión de manuscrito, informe de árbitro, revisa mi artículo, criticar artículo, simular revisión, revisión editorial, calibrar revisor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。