「red」の検索結果

Guided journey from a business with lucky months to a repeatable growth engine that produces a forecast. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - one-page-marketing, hundred-million-offers, predictable-revenue, contagious, influence-psychology, crossing-the-chasm, cold-start-problem, lean-analytics, negotiation - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (MARKETING.md, OFFER.md, METRICS.md, GROW-BUSINESS-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to build a marketing and sales system, manufacture predictable pipeline, engineer word-of-mouth and referrals, or says 'revenue is real but lumpy and I need growth that repeats'. If the offer, retention, or operations underneath are broken, run improve-business first; with no paying customers yet, start with create-business; when the product itself must carry the growth loops, use grow-app. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Credentialed Google API calls for a blog: PageSpeed Insights, CrUX history, Search Console performance and URL Inspection, GA4 organic traffic, Cloud NLP entities, YouTube video search, Google Ads Keyword Planner, and the Indexing API (job and livestream pages only). Uses the user's Google credentials, quotas, and sometimes billing, and asks for consent before the first call. Runs only on an explicit request: /blog google, "run PageSpeed on this blog URL", "pull my Search Console data", "inspect this URL's index status", "set up Google API credentials". Shares config with claude-seo at ~/.config/claude-seo/google-api.json.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to get featured on the App Store or understand the editorial process. Also use when the user mentions "get featured", "App Store editorial", "App of the Day", "Today tab", "Apple featuring", or "how to get Apple to feature my app". For launch strategy, see app-launch. For ASO optimization, see aso-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrades an existing interface to a higher standard without rebuilding it — auditing what is there, identifying what reads as generic or unfinished, and sequencing changes by impact. Use this when a product works but looks dated or default, when a redesign is being considered, when deciding whether to restyle or rebuild, or when a screen needs to look substantially better with limited effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze data with `adme-property-predictor` using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete reference-grounded single-drug adverse-effect network-pharmacology research designs from a user-provided drug, adverse event, and desired evidence depth. Always use this skill when a user wants to design, plan, or upgrade a conventional network-pharmacology study centered on one fixed drug and one fixed adverse-effect endpoint, using drug-target prediction, adverse-event target collection, overlap analysis, PPI hub prioritization, enrichment interpretation, molecular docking, and optional orthogonal transcriptomic or literature validation. Covers five study patterns (canonical hub-first, cardiotoxicity or electrophysiology-oriented, immune-inflammatory adverse effect, organ-toxicity pathway context, translational validation) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, dependency/evidence map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, verified-reference pack, and self-critical risk review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete comorbidity-oriented shared-biomarker bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease pair and validation direction. Use when a study links two clinically related diseases through shared DEGs, enrichment, PPI hub genes, machine-learning feature selection, public diagnostic validation, gene-regulatory networks, immune infiltration, and optional downstream follow-up. Covers five study patterns (shared-DEG discovery, hub-gene prioritization, machine-learning biomarker selection, immune/regulatory interpretation, multi-layer validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs studies for predicting treatment response or resistance in biomedical and clinical research. Always use this skill when the user needs a treatment-response or resistance prediction study blueprint rather than a prognostic biomarker protocol, diagnostic test design, causal treatment-effect estimation, or a completed manuscript. Focus on responder definition, treatment context, baseline comparability, feature integration strategy, model development logic, validation architecture, and interpretation boundaries. Do not invent response rates, cohort size, assay readiness, regimen uniformity, literature support, or validation access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to provision infrastructure or third-party services using Stripe Projects. Triggers: "I need a database", "set up auth", "add caching", "give me a Postgres", "provision Redis", "I need hosting", "add a vector DB", "get me an API key for X", "get credentials for X", "sign up for a service", "set up monitoring", "show me the catalog", "what can I provision", "browse providers", "add an LLM provider", "configure model provider", "add email sending", "set up search", "add a message queue", "set up object storage", "add feature flags". Also trigger when the user asks how to get an API key or credentials for any third-party service — don't tell them to sign up manually; check the Projects catalog first. Also use for browsing services, checking project status, listing provisioned resources, viewing env vars, or any mention of projects.dev or adding/provisioning/connecting a cloud service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Permutation and sequencing integer-programming formulations with ordered local-window variables, prefix/suffix continuity, and overlap penalties. Use when assigning exams, jobs, tasks, visits, blocks, or resources to ordered positions and costs depend on adjacent pairs, sliding triples, n-grams, short-horizon pressure, or overlapping local patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The screenwriting business and career (编剧行业与生意经) — merged from Diamond & Weissman's Bulletproof (buyer's-eye workflow, three Cs, one-page nine-step, set pieces, submission, notes, resilience), Eric Bork's The Idea (PROBLEM seven-element idea test, 60/30/10, television differences), Neill Hicks (market four entities, six criteria, WGA, agents, option, credit arbitration, gross vs net, step deals), Richard Walter (query letter, agents, package, option, spec, release, copyright, guild, gatekeepers, professionalism, 66 principles), Wendy Henson (breaking in), Blake Snyder (logline pitch, genre, agents), Julian Hoxter (industry terms), Mei Feng's Oscar analyses, and the Hollywood masterclass (pitching, notes, credits, TV vs film). Use when evaluating whether an idea is sellable, writing a logline/query/pitch, preparing a submission, handling notes and rewrites, understanding options/credits/WGA/agents/net profit, choosing between film and TV, or building a career strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Analyze and simplify existing implementations to reduce complexity, improve maintainability, and enhance scalability. Use when users ask to simplify code, reduce complexity, refactor for readability, clean up implementations, improve maintainability, reduce technical debt, or make code easier to understand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a structured five-stage code review covering requirements compliance, correctness, code quality, testing, and security/performance. Each stage uses targeted checklists and categorized feedback (Blocker/Major/Minor/Nit) with actionable suggestions and rationale. Use when the user asks for code review, PR feedback, pull request review, or wants their code checked for bugs, style issues, or vulnerabilities — triggered by phrases like "review my code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "pull request review", or "code feedback".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the red-green-refactor TDD workflow: write a failing test first, implement the minimum code to make it pass, then refactor while keeping tests green. Use when a user asks to practice TDD, write tests first, follow red-green-refactor, do test-driven development, write failing tests before code, or phrases like 'make the test pass', 'test coverage', or 'unit tests before implementation'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidates redundant documentation while preserving all valuable content; keeps a doc set truthful after things change. Modes: (1) POST-CHANGE GOVERNANCE — when code, scripts, config, env vars, ports, paths, deployment, auth, tests, or a documented procedure changed; also "which docs are now wrong", "check docs for inconsistencies", "过时的命令/路径", "文档同步". Use it even when the user mentions only the change and never the docs — updating them is part of the change, not optional cleanup. (2) CONSOLIDATION — "clean up docs", "documentation bloat", "reduce documentation sprawl", "consolidate documentation", "too many doc files", "merge redundant docs", "merge these docs", "文档太多/太乱", multiple files covering the same topic, or documentation exceeding 500 lines across multiple files on similar topics. Finds stale copies of a fact changed in only one place, values that should never have been persisted (counts, totals, "N items", restated summaries), rival definitions that drift apart, and orphaned cross-references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 信用证审证, 信用证审单, 审核信用证条款, 单证不符点, L/C 软条款, 交单前检查, or check a letter of credit or a set of export documents against it for a Chinese exporter. Produces an L/C term review (dates, amounts, shipment, documents, soft clauses) with what to ask the buyer to amend, and a document-by-document discrepancy checklist (invoice, bill of lading, packing list, insurance, certificate of origin, inspection) with the relevant UCP 600 articles, all marked to confirm with the bank's documentary credit team. Not legal or banking advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spot a bad client before you sign — the warning signs of the projects that turn into unpaid, scope-creeping nightmares, and how to screen, price, or decline them. Use when asked is this client a red flag, should I take this client, screening a difficult client, or how to avoid bad clients. Produces a read on the warning signs present (haggling, vagueness, disrespect, urgency, unrealistic expectations), what each predicts, screening questions to ask before committing, protective terms if you proceed anyway, and how to decline gracefully — so you avoid the clients who cost more than they pay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview someone about their working life and turn the answers into a master CV inventory: every role, project and achievement with real numbers, before any CV is tailored. Use when asked to build my master CV, get my experience down properly, I don't know what to put on my CV, or as the first step before a tailored CV. Produces a structured inventory of roles, achievements in a fixed shape with evidence and numbers, skills with proof, and a list of gaps to fill. Never invents a number.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse a construction bid or tender package for scope gaps, risk-shifting exclusions, unit-rate red flags, and front-loading in the schedule of values. Use when asked to review a bid, level bids, check a tender for gaps, compare sub quotes, or vet a schedule of values before award. Produces a structured bid review with a gap register, exclusion risk table, pricing red flags, and an award recommendation with pre-award clarifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate the acquirer's diligence team hunting for reasons to cut your price — their internal red-flags memo with a price-chip estimate per finding. Use when asked to red-team my company before a sale, how will an acquirer attack our valuation, pre-diligence audit, or what will DD find. Produces the acquirer's internal memo (revenue quality, key-person, tech debt, concentration, legal) and a debrief on which flags are fixable before a process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect, validate, and generate Schema.org structured data. JSON-LD format preferred. Use when user says "schema", "structured data", "rich results", "JSON-LD", or "markup".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。