「risk」の検索結果

Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "plan my launch tier", "how big should this launch be", or "build a launch risk register with kill criteria"; produces a tier decision (Tier 1 flagship all-channel / Tier 2 targeted / Tier 3 changelog-level), a launch-type declaration (new-product / feature / relaunch / partnership with co-marketing split), an effort calibration matrix (tier to channel intensity and asset scope), D0/W1/M1 KPI targets (labeled Estimated), a risk register (likelihood x blast-radius, owners, mitigations, kill criteria / rollback thresholds), and a T-8w to T+4w timeline skeleton. Not for picking the launch date or window — use launch-window-planner; not for creator-channel launch campaigns — use campaign-planner. 发布分级/发布类型/风险登记册/kill criteria

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure designs document third-party dependencies, SLAs, quotas, failure modes, and vendor lock-in mitigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a test strategy around product risk, business invariants, failure modes, and existing controls, deciding what deserves testing and at which boundary rather than maximising coverage. Use whenever the user asks how to test something, wants a test plan or strategy, is deciding between unit/integration/contract/E2E/property/concurrency testing, or wants to know whether existing tests actually protect what matters. Prefer this over writing tests immediately. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving risk coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review FriendlyBet privacy, RLS security, auth, recovery codes, session storage, data minimization, public snapshots, share surfaces, legal/gambling wording, real-money risk, and compliance-sensitive product changes. Use when a task changes data access, user identity, public sharing, money-like language, security posture, or legal risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review FriendlyBet quality, regression risk, test plans, release readiness, version bump discipline, scoring/locking correctness, provider fallback behavior, and dirty-worktree safety. Use before shipping app code, scoring changes, migrations, sports integrations, copy updates, PWA cache changes, or any risky user-facing flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en gestion d'actifs avancé (portfolio, risk, diversification, rebalancing, DZ context)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en audit interne (risk assessment, controls, compliance, recommendations, DZ context)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor portfolio risk, R-multiples, and position limits. Creates hedging strategies, calculates expectancy, and implements stop-losses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when creating new UI from scratch, doing a visual design pass, or when output risks looking like generic AI-generated design. Trigger words: UI 作成, デザイン, 画面を作る, 見た目を良く, デザイン改善, ランディング, ヒーロー, おしゃれに, AIっぽい, design pass.

Perform security risk analysis on Kubernetes resource manifests using Kubesec to identify misconfigurations, privilege escalation risks, and deviations from security best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, released in February 2024, provides a comprehensive taxonomy for managing cybersecurity risk through six core Functions - Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. bu skill covers conducting a maturity assessment against the CSF using Implementation Tiers to measure organizational cybersecurity posture and create improvement roadmaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auditing Microsoft Entra ID (Azure Active Directory) configuration to identify risky authentication policies, overly permissive role assignments, stale accounts, conditional access gaps, and guest user risks using AzureAD PowerShell, Microsoft Graph API, and ScoutSuite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement API Security Posture Management to continuously discover, classify, and score APIs based on risk while enforcing security policies across the API lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Busabase-backed App-in-Skill dashboard for a revenue-based-financing (RBF) fund or private-credit book of many small SME contracts. Use when the user invokes $kelly-portfolio-health or /kelly-portfolio-health, wants to check portfolio health, AUM, repayment progress, concentration risk, or a watchlist of contracts with declining revenue. Human actions (flag a contract for review, clear a flag, leave a note) write directly onto the contract's own Busabase record — this skill never moves money or changes contract terms. Generic and brand-free — not tied to any specific company or fund.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kelly Insurance Intel: App-in-Skill daily industry intelligence cockpit for insurance and wealth advisory (Busabase App-in-Skill). Use when the user asks about insurance, wealth advisory, client risk reminders, market news, policyholder follow-up,保险, or financial-advisor sales scenes. Prepares news/source signals, buyer-intent interpretation, approved sales actions, and channel drafts for review before any external handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legal matter-strategy App-in-Skill (Busabase-backed) desk for new-case strategy, issue trees, evidence checklists, risk analysis, pleading outlines, and approval-gated drafting packs grounded in internal precedents. Use when the user invokes $kelly-legal-matter-strategy, mentions 案件策略, 办案辅助, 证据清单, 争议焦点, 文书生成辅助, litigation strategy, arbitration strategy, pleading outline, or wants a Busabase-backed desk where responsible lawyers review agent-prepared strategy before use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a vulnerability exception and risk acceptance tracking system with approval workflows, compensating controls documentation, and expiration management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auditing Microsoft Entra ID (Azure Active Directory) configuration to identify risky authentication policies, overly permissive role assignments, stale accounts, conditional access gaps, and guest user risks using AzureAD PowerShell, Microsoft Graph API, and ScoutSuite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mendelian randomization (MR) causal inference — does an exposure, risk factor, or biomarker CAUSALLY affect a disease/outcome, using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IEU OpenGWAS / EpiGraphDB MR-EvE). Use this whenever the user asks if X causes Y, whether an observational association is actually causal or just correlation, if a biomarker/trait is a causal risk factor, wants to triangulate epidemiology against genetic evidence, or mentions Mendelian randomization, instrumental-variable analysis, two-sample MR, or genetic causal evidence — even if they never say "MR" (e.g. "is LDL cholesterol actually causal for heart disease?", "does BMI cause type 2 diabetes or just correlate?", "is CRP a causal driver of stroke?"). Covers trait-label resolution, MR effect direction/magnitude, instrument quality (MOE score), method agreement (IVW vs MR-Egger vs weighted median), bidirectional MR for reverse causation, and distinguishing causation from genetic correlation. Not for plain GWAS association lookups (use the GWAS skills) or fitting your own instruments from raw summary statistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and validates predictive time-to-event models on clinical and omics data with penalized Cox, random survival forests, gradient-boosted and deep survival models, and prediction-grade evaluation (Uno's C, time-dependent AUC, integrated Brier, calibration, competing risks). Use when building an individualized risk predictor or prognostic omics signature, choosing a survival model, or evaluating one beyond the C-index. For Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and classical Cox hazard-ratio inference in a trial see clinical-biostatistics/survival-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn public agenda, news, policy moves, geopolitical developments, sanctions, trade disputes, regulation, elections, diplomatic signals, and strategic-risk events into decision-ready briefs. Use when the user asks an agent to analyze what changed, why it matters, who is affected, what is uncertain, scenarios, watch-next indicators, or risk implications instead of producing a simple news summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep GPT-5.6 and other coding-agent work proportional to the request by locking scope, choosing the smallest sufficient implementation, matching verification to risk, and stopping when success is proven. Use for implementations, bug fixes, refactors, reviews, or maintenance where scope creep, speculative abstractions, unrelated cleanup, repeated test runs, unnecessary dependencies, or polishing beyond the request are risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。