863 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Scientific validation protocol for verifying fixes work through observation, not assumption. Use when claiming a bug fix, code change, refactoring, or implementation is complete — enforces reproduce-broken-state then define-success-criteria then apply-fix then verify-outcome. Success means observing intended behavior, not absence of errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing a task the orchestrator dispatched — reads the task and its orchestrator response from the work ledger, loads task-level skills, implements against acceptance criteria, records divergences and the completion report as task sections, and closes the attempt. Triggers on task execution within the implement-feature loop or when an agent picks up a specific task from a plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Works backward from the stated goal through its prerequisite chain — what must exist to reach the goal, then what each of those requires, back to the current state — classifying each prerequisite as AVAILABLE, DERIVABLE, or MISSING, and blocking planning until nothing is MISSING. Use before creating plans, delegating to agents, or defining acceptance criteria. Activates on specs, PRDs, tickets, RFCs, architecture designs, and multi-step engineering tasks. Always pass `#N` or an inline goal — invoking with no argument and no inline context returns BLOCKED. Integrates with CoVe-style planning pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Stage 1 Discovery is complete and design must begin — transforms the ARTIFACT:DISCOVERY into an actionable ARTIFACT:PLAN via RT-ICA prerequisite verification. Produces approach, components, success criteria, acceptance tests, and risks. Blocks on missing prerequisites before design proceeds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate why something happens — confirm the question and success criteria with you, then trace the root cause with an evidence chain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute structured acceptance checks and record their observed results for later comparison. Use to capture a pre-change baseline or a post-change verification state without treating expected nonzero baseline results as execution failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when SAM Stage 5 Execution has completed and task results need independent verification against acceptance criteria. Dispatches a separate reviewer agent to fact-check implementation outputs and returns COMPLETE or NEEDS_WORK with specific findings and remediation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, create, run, monitor, and maintain Vapi Simulations for assistants and squads. Use for turning plain-language requirements into a coverage plan, simulation personalities, scenarios, structured-output success criteria, simulations, suites, extending an existing suite, chat or voice runs, tool mocks, target variables, lifecycle webhooks, regression coverage, launch readiness, CI quality gates, run-result analysis, and simulation API validation errors. Do not use for fixed-turn mock-conversation Evals unless the user is deciding between Evals and Simulations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Value investing analysis using Graham (NCAV/net-net/defensive-investor) and Buffett (economic moat/ROE/FCF) methodologies. Covers single-stock diagnostics and batch screening for both Graham cigar-butt and Buffett quality-compounder criteria. Runs cross-statement reconciliation before scoring. Data from Longbridge CLI first, MCP fallback, WebSearch only for genuine gaps. Triggers: "格雷厄姆", "巴菲特", "捡烟蒂", "烟蒂股", "NCAV", "净流动资产", "护城河", "价值投资", "安全边际", "深度价值", "撿煙蒂", "煙蒂股", "淨流動資產", "護城河", "安全邊際", "Graham", "Buffett", "cigar butt", "net-net", "NCAV screen", "moat", "value investing", "margin of safety", "deep value", "quality compounder", "價值投資", "深度價值", "防御型投资者", "防禦型投資者"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build structured ICP documentation by scraping case studies, testimonials, and solutions pages from your website. Produces firmographics, champion + economic buyer personas, pain points, decision criteria, anti-ICP, customer proof points, and voice-of-customer synthesis. Writes to marketing/icp/ICP.md as the canonical ICP every downstream skill reads. Triggers - "icp research", "ideal customer profile", "persona research", "customer segments", "who are our customers", "build ICP"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maps your company's GTM motion (PLG, SLG, or Hybrid) to concrete funnel stages with inputs, outputs, and qualification criteria per stage. Detects motion type from website + Exa research, then produces pre-close + post-close stage definitions, the FETE mapping (Fit / Engagement / Tier / Eligibility), and closed-lost re-entry paths. Triggers - "funnel strategy", "funnel stages", "pipeline stages", "sales process", "lead qualification", "GTM motion mapping", or any work defining how leads flow through the business. Upstream - recommended company-context, icp-research. Downstream - feeds lifecycle-marketing, outreach-emails, content-strategy. NOT for lead scoring logic (use /lead-scoring) or lifecycle email campaigns (use /lifecycle-marketing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI content generation with OpenAI and Claude, callAIWithPrompt usage, prompt storage in app_settings, structured outputs, response format validation, multi-criteria scoring, rate limiting, JSON schema, and AI API best practices. Use when generating content, creating prompts, scoring articles, or working with OpenAI/Claude APIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dependency management guidelines for Jarvy - crate selection criteria, feature flag best practices, version management, security auditing with cargo-audit and cargo-deny.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate alternatives through a weighted multi-criteria decision matrix. Use when the user calls for the *evaluation* of *alternatives*, wants to *compare* things, or asks what the best is from a list of choices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Partnership and co-marketing campaign planner — partner selection criteria, joint content strategy, cross-promotion plans, and co-branded assets. Use when "partnership", "co-marketing", "partner program", "cross-promotion", "joint venture", "co-branded", "partner campaign", or any request to plan or execute a marketing partnership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当用户要写出高质量 Goal Prompt，把模糊、战略性、多步骤、证据不足、持续/自动化或容易跑偏的请求整理成可执行、可验证、可暂停的目标契约时使用。适用于写 goal、优化任务提示词、明确 done/success criteria、deep research 后定战略、大改前 inventory、修复跑偏计划、识别可委托的重复 workflow、为 Codex 或 Claude Code 准备执行任务；默认一次性交付只生成 Goal Prompt，只有存在真实后续迭代需求时才追加 Loop Prompt，不执行 goal 或 loop，也不创建自动化。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert product specification and documentation writer. Use when creating PRDs, user stories, acceptance criteria, technical specifications, API documentation, edge case analysis, design handoff docs, feature flag plans, or success metrics. Covers the full spectrum from high-level requirements to implementation-ready specifications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Mileva Method (CRISP) — Phase 5: Prove. Success validation against Phase R baseline metrics, test log review, and AI justification validation. Use after deployment. Triggers on "prove", "phase 5", "validate", "did it work", "success criteria", "measure results", or after go-live.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate structured software specifications for features, bug fixes, and products. Use when the user wants to create a spec, PRD, feature brief, requirements document, or when starting any new implementation that needs a specification first. Invoke via /spec-writer or when the user says "write a spec", "spec this out", "create a spec", "I need a spec for...", or describes a feature they want to build. Produces adaptive-complexity specs with Job Stories, Gherkin acceptance criteria, and three-tier boundaries. Output is a markdown file ready for agent execution or human review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user faces a real decision with stakes and wants it framed cleanly — options, ranked criteria, a recommendation, the falsifier, and reversibility — then logged to decisions/log.md. Trigger on "/decide", "help me decide", "should I X or Y", "frame this decision", "what's the call here", "log this decision".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to verify a feature/story meets all Definition of Done criteria before marking complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Accessibility audit, scoped to the surfaces a product actually has. Detects web / rendered_markdown / terminal / native_app / video_audio / document / headless, then applies only the criteria that bind. WCAG 2.1 AA in full for web; not at all for headless.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run eval scenarios to benchmark Mycelium effectiveness. Execute tasks using reflexion loop, validate against success criteria, record metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。