3,842 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guides continuous improvement and change management for SMEs adopting AI. Applies Marginal Gains philosophy, Kaizen principles, and structured sprint methodologies to organizational transformation. Use when user asks about change management, continuous improvement, AI adoption strategy, team resistance, transformation roadmaps, or improvement sprints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert SwiftUI guidance for macOS apps — covers writing and reviewing code with runtime-level understanding of observation, concurrency, performance, and platform integration. Use when user asks to "build a SwiftUI view", "review my SwiftUI code", "fix observation issues", "bridge AppKit", "architect state management", "debug view updates", or works on any macOS SwiftUI project — building features, reviewing existing code, debugging view updates or performance, fixing concurrency issues, architecting state management, bridging AppKit, or making design decisions. Do NOT use for iOS/iPadOS-only SwiftUI, UIKit bridging, or basic Swift language questions. Focuses on non-obvious traps and deep patterns, not basics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master modern Angular state management with Signals, NgRx, and RxJS. Use when setting up global state, managing component stores, choosing between state solutions, or migrating from legacy patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploys and configures osquery for real-time endpoint monitoring using SQL-based queries to inspect running processes, open ports, installed software, and system configuration. Use when building visibility into endpoint state, threat hunting across fleet, or implementing compliance monitoring. Activates for requests involving osquery deployment, endpoint visibility, fleet management, or SQL-based endpoint querying.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Correlates security events in IBM QRadar SIEM using AQL (Ariel Query Language), custom rules, building blocks, and offense management to detect multi-stage attacks across network, endpoint, and application log sources. Use when SOC analysts need to investigate QRadar offenses, build correlation rules, or tune detection logic for reducing false positives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy DefectDojo as a centralized vulnerability management dashboard with scanner integrations, deduplication, metrics tracking, and Jira ticketing workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement a vulnerability aging dashboard and SLA tracking system to measure remediation performance against severity-based timelines and drive accountability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a vulnerability exception and risk acceptance tracking system with approval workflows, compensating controls documentation, and expiration management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
サプライチェーン最適化コンサルティングスキル。需要予測、在庫最適化、調達戦略、 物流ネットワーク設計、S&OP(Sales and Operations Planning)を支援。 Use when optimizing supply chain operations, improving inventory management, designing logistics networks, or conducting supply chain risk assessments. Triggers: "supply chain", "在庫最適化", "inventory optimization", "demand forecasting", "S&OP", "procurement strategy", "logistics network".
Professional project management skill aligned with PMBOK® 6th/7th Edition standards. Use this skill when you need to define requirements (ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148), review project plans, generate progress reports with Earned Value Management (EVM), conduct risk analysis, estimate costs, or provide project health assessments. Ideal for creating comprehensive project documentation, analyzing project performance metrics (SPI, CPI, EAC), managing risks across 14 categories, and ensuring stakeholder alignment. Triggers: "create project plan", "analyze project health", "calculate EVM", "risk assessment", "requirements definition", "progress report", "cost estimation", or requests involving PMBOK knowledge areas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
システムログを分析してエラーの根本原因を特定し、段階的に深堀りしていくデバッグ専門家スキル。 アプリケーションログ、システムログ、クラウドサービスログなど様々な形式に対応。 5 Whys、タイムライン分析、Fishbone分析などのRCA（根本原因分析）手法を用いて 問題の本質を突き止め、再発防止策まで提案する。 Use when analyzing system logs to find error root causes, debugging application issues, or performing technical post-mortem analysis with log data. For organizational incident management processes (post-incident review, corrective action plans, incident reports without log data), use incident-rca-specialist instead. Triggers: "analyze this log", "find the root cause", "debug this error", "why is this failing", "log analysis", "what caused this crash", "troubleshoot this issue"
This skill should be used when providing ITIL 4-based IT service management consulting. Use this when organizations need guidance on implementing ITIL 4 practices, improving service management maturity, optimizing IT operations, or aligning IT services with business objectives. Provides tailored recommendations based on department, scenario, and organizational context using comprehensive ITIL 4 knowledge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DAMA-DMBOK（Data Management Body of Knowledge）準拠のデータマネジメントスキル。 11の知識領域（データガバナンス、データ品質、メタデータ管理、MDM等）を網羅し、 データ戦略策定から具体的な改善施策まで支援する。 Use when: データ戦略策定、データガバナンス構築、データ品質改善、データカタログ作成、 MDM導入、DX推進、データ移行プロジェクト、データ成熟度評価。 Triggers: "データガバナンス", "データ品質", "データカタログ", "メタデータ管理", "MDM", "データ戦略", "DMBOK", "データ成熟度", "データリネージ"
Use this skill when creating executive-level briefing materials, board reports, management meeting presentations, or investor briefings. This skill provides the "So What? / Why Now? / What Next?" framework, data visualization guidelines optimized for executives, and professional templates for rapid document creation. Triggers include "create board report", "executive summary", "management meeting materials", "investor presentation", "one-page summary", or requests to communicate complex information to senior leadership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
大規模システムリプレース・移行プロジェクトについて、マルチベンダー管理に長けたPMOの視点で「見落とされがちな潜在リスク」を洗い出す。正常系設計や特定ベンダーの担当範囲内には現れにくい「ベンダー間の隙間」「業務影響」「異常系」の死角を、4視点の分析フレームワークで特定し、Backlog起票用のリスク表とキラークエスチョンを生成する。要件定義・運用設計・負荷試験フェーズ特化フレームワークへの切替にも対応。総合テスト終盤・移行リハーサル前・負荷試験計画時のリスク総ざらいに使用する。Do NOT use for 個別インシデントの根本原因分析（incident-rca）、要求の追加・変更・矛盾検証（requirement-management）、運用設計書そのものの新規作成（operations-design）。
運用設計コンサルタントとして、対象業界の調査とヒアリングに基づきITIL 4・SRE・DevOpsベストプラクティスの運用設計書を作成する。新規サービスの運用設計、既存システムの運用改善、運用移管の準備に使用する。Do NOT use for ソフトウェアの機能要求の定義（requirement-managementを使用すること）。
IPA非機能要求グレード2018（可用性・性能拡張性・運用保守性・移行性・セキュリティ・システム環境）の記入済み要件を入力として、運用設計書を生成する。非機能要件定義が完了しているプロジェクトの運用設計フェーズで使用する。Do NOT use for 非機能要件の定義自体（requirement-managementを使用すること）。Do NOT use for 業界調査やヒアリングから始める運用設計（operations-designを使用すること）。
【非推奨】設計書を永続化しない運用へ移行したため非推奨。設計は実装時にPR本文とGitHubコメントへ記載し、要求の管理は requirement-management を使用すること。既存の docs/sdd/design/ を保守・参照する場合にのみ使用する。アーキテクチャ設計、コンポーネント定義、API設計、データベーススキーマのMarkdown文書を作成・編集する。Do NOT use for 新規プロジェクトの設計（設計はPR本文に記載すること）。
METAINFORMANT rules for directory projects/hymenoptera_amalgkit/doc/03_data_management. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0. Use for cybersecurity risk management, GOVERN, IDENTIFY, PROTECT, DETECT, RESPOND, RECOVER, Organizational Profiles, CSF Tiers, supply chain risk, enterprise risk management, incident response. Covers the CSF 2.0 document only; does not cover specific SP 800-53 controls, NIST RMF system authorization steps, or sector-specific regulations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA AMS Lifecycle V&V Guidelines (verification and validation), Version 3.0, dated April 2017. Use for applying verification and validation across the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS) lifecycle: the verify-vs-validate distinction (built right vs. right thing), the work-product/component/product tiers, the nine V&V planning elements, the four method catalogs (Appendix C), decision-point-gated V&V (SASP, CRD, Investment Analysis, Solution Implementation, In-Service Management), the Appendix B document checklists (PRD/APB/ISPD/PMP), and the DT/OT/IOA test triad. Scope limits: this is an FAA acquisition-V&V doctrine, NOT a general SE process model, requirements-engineering manual, or test-design textbook. It borrows its core V&V definitions from CMMI v1.2 (SEI, paraphrased) and presumes the surrounding AMS lifecycle (see the FAA SEM pack); its phase tables are policy snapshots as of April 2017 and it is thin on detailed test methods, tool specifics, and anything outside FAA acquisition governance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide (GAO-16-89G, 2015). Use for building, assessing, or auditing a program's integrated master schedule (IMS): the ten best practices of a reliable schedule (capture, sequence, resource, duration, traceability, valid critical path, reasonable total float, schedule risk analysis, updating, baseline), the four characteristics (comprehensive, well-constructed, credible, controlled), critical path method arithmetic (forward/backward pass, total float), schedule risk analysis (Monte Carlo, contingency), statusing and baseline control, and the Appendix II audit triad. Scheduling/time-management oriented: it is the authority on schedule reliability, but it is NOT a cost-estimating guide, a full SE process model, an agile guide, or a risk-management framework — see sibling packs (gao-cost, dau-se-guidebook, nasa-schedule, nasa-risk) for those.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。