3,011 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Draft a changelog for the next release by summarizing git commits since the last tag. Use only when the user asks to draft release notes, write a changelog entry, or prepare the next version's notes — never trigger automatically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Step 3 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Execute the literature search strategy from outline.json — discover candidate papers via web search, verify them through Semantic Scholar (Levenshtein > 70 fuzzy title match, temporal cutoff, dedup by paperId), build a BibTeX file, and draft Introduction + Related Work using ≥90% of the verified pool. Runs in parallel with the plotting-agent. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 3 or when the user asks to "find citations for my paper", "draft the related work", or "build the bibliography".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules. Maintains a worklog and snapshots each iteration so revert is real, not symbolic. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 5 or when the user asks to "refine the draft", "iterate on the paper", or "run peer review on this paper".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conversational profile builder. Produces validated JSON config files for any rootnode Skill that consumes profile-shaped configuration (handoff trigger check, mode router, critic gate, future Skills). Reads a target JSON Schema (draft-07), conducts a progressive-depth interview using plain-language questions, validates answers, and writes the resulting JSON to a destination path. Schema-agnostic — works with any profile schema conforming to draft-07. Use when a user needs to create, clone, or revise a profile and you do not want them hand-editing JSON. Trigger on: "build me a profile," "create a profile," "I need a profile for X," "set up my profile," "edit my profile," "clone the X profile," "walk me through making a profile." Do NOT use when the user already has a working profile and only wants to invoke the consuming Skill, when the schema cannot be located, or for non-profile JSON config work. Always validate before writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design new proteins that bind a chosen surface, using BindCraft's AlphaFold2-guided hallucination or the RFdiffusion backbone plus ProteinMPNN sequence pipeline. Use this skill to specify a target epitope by hotspot residue, trim a receptor to the region worth designing against, set up a design campaign, and filter the output on the in-silico metrics that predict experimental success — interface predicted TM-score, predicted aligned error at the interface, buried surface area, and shape complementarity. Also trigger on BindCraft, RFdiffusion, ProteinMPNN, minibinder, hallucination, inverse folding, hotspot residue, epitope targeting, ipTM, or de novo binder.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a project charter that defines scope, stakeholders, success criteria, and initial risk register. Covers problem statement, RACI matrix, milestone planning, and scope boundaries for both agile and classic methodologies. Use when kicking off a new project or initiative, formalizing scope after an informal start, aligning stakeholders before detailed planning begins, or transitioning from discovery to active project work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Minimum Sufficient Language (MSL) principle through the MSL Kernel to write anything a reader must act on. Bind the reader and what they already know, partition facts from the machinery that produced them, emit each admitted fact as an action, a verification, a judgment, or a state, and stop when every claim is checkable and the reader can act. Use for status updates, work-in-progress reports to your own user, closeout and convergence comments, tickets, pull request and review write-ups, incident and postmortem notes, emails, memos, and any draft for readers outside the work. Also use when the user says MSL, Minimum Sufficient Language, write this for stakeholders, drop the jargon, make this readable, or asks for a paste-ready draft.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn photos with a clearly isolated landmark into two-color 3:4 kraft-paper stencil posters, in split comparison or full-canvas mode. Do not use when no single landmark is recognizable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Content angle generator for turning dry expert topics into high-engagement infotainment. Applies 7 journalistic angle types (Myth vs Reality, Paradox, Level Error, Price of Solution, Conditions, Hidden Driver, Contrary Thesis) + historical/future lens + news-hook framing. Use when experts need their content to become interesting rather than just informative - blog posts, video scripts, social content, newsletters, landing pages, ad hooks. For any niche: B2B, B2C, services, products, personal brand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user needs SCI/SCIE/ESCI/SSCI journal-submission help: evidence-backed candidate-journal discovery from a title, abstract, keywords, or manuscript text; public-metric and risk lookup for a known journal; or a pre-submission compliance check of a draft against a chosen journal's Author Guidelines and same-journal conventions. Also for Chinese requests such as 选刊、投稿期刊推荐、期刊查询、中科院分区、投稿前检查、期刊要求核对. This skill produces candidates, evidence, checks, and uncertainty; it does not judge research quality, predict acceptance, choose a uniquely best journal, draft prose, or simulate peer review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Software Factory 2026秋の開発フローをこのsessionに適用する。 着手前に不明点をユーザーに質問、変更が一段落したらcodexでbug確認、draft PR作成、対話コンテキストexport、インラインレビューコメントの草稿、ユーザーの指示でsanity-review、ready for review後のsquash and mergeのcommit message草稿の提示、という進め方を定める。 開発の開始時にユーザーが手動で起動する。
Hard-gated ideation for an Arbor research run. Load at the START of every IDEATE round, before drafting any hypothesis. Enforces the PI mindset (mechanism over knob), the four-question first-principles probe, the kill-filter, and the four-line hypothesis format. Ported from Arbor's idea_drafting + first_principles_probe.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
将现成的文章内容发布到微信公众号草稿箱。当用户说"发布文章"、"发布到草稿箱"、"publish to draft"、"推送到公众号"时触发。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
内容修订员（任润泽 Ren）。由 research-chief-editor 主理人调度，根据 draft-reviewer 的 REVISE 反馈对章节草稿进行修改。逐条回应审稿意见，补充来源、纠正事实、补充反方观点、深化分析，保持未受批评部分不变。 触发词：由 research-chief-editor 主理人调度执行，不直接面向用户。当主理人收到 Phase 3.2 的 REVISE 判定后激活。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当用户要把教材/考纲/讲义/某领域知识加工成 AI 苏格拉底老师能拿去上课的教学蓝本（pure-blueprint）或一本给人读的流畅教材（human-readable，AI 也能直接教）时使用。适用任何学科，有教师用书可针对应试。触发词："造一本教学蓝本/做一本 XX 教材/按这套方法写一本书/复刻这个 skill 的写法"。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate Azure incidents and service degradations with a read-only workflow using Azure CLI, Resource Health, Activity Log, metrics, resource logs, and official Microsoft docs. Use when troubleshooting Azure outages, Resource Health alerts, Azure Firewall or DNS failures, ExpressRoute or BGP instability, VM availability problems, AKS incidents, App Service failures, database connectivity issues, Entra ID sign-in problems, load balancer issues, platform-vs-workload cutover, or drafting a troubleshooting report. Triggers on 'Azure トラブルシューティング', '障害調査', '切り分け', 'Resource Health', '復旧確認', 'Azure Firewall', 'DNS', 'ExpressRoute', 'VPN Gateway', 'BGP', 'AKS', 'App Service', 'SQL', 'PostgreSQL', 'Cosmos DB', 'Entra ID', 'incident', 'degraded', 'unavailable'.
Remove AI-generated tone and make writing sound more human in Japanese and English. Use when reviewing drafts for AIっぽさ, humanizing article/blog text, 文体チェック, AI感を消したい, or ChatGPT tells.
Prepare and verify Microsoft Teams desktop chat drafts with Windows UI Automation, stopping before send. Use for Teamsチャット下書き, デスクトップTeams操作, 宛先確認, メッセージ入力, or when Teams Web/CDP is unavailable.
Draft a professional customer-facing response tailored to the situation and relationship. Use when answering a product question, responding to an escalation or outage, delivering bad news like a delay or won't-fix, declining a feature request, or replying to a billing issue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft blog posts, social media, email newsletters, landing pages, press releases, and case studies with channel-specific formatting and SEO recommendations. Use when writing any marketing content, when you need headline or subject line options, or when adapting a message for a specific platform, audience, and brand voice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process call notes or a transcript — extract action items, draft follow-up email, generate internal summary. Use when pasting rough notes or a transcript after a discovery, demo, or negotiation call, drafting a customer follow-up, logging the activity for your CRM, or capturing objections and next steps for your team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when independently reviewing a research-paper draft before submission, running a mock top-conference panel, assessing readiness or accept/reject risk, or predicting reviewer concerns for venues such as CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, ICLR, NeurIPS, and AAAI. Does not draft or audit author responses after official reviews arrive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft concise follow-up messages, nudges, reminders, and recap emails from open decisions, stale requests, or recent meetings. Use when the work is repetitive business writing with known context. Do not use for sensitive legal language, high-stakes negotiation, or board-level communication without review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。