「thread」の検索結果

Enterprise-specific view across CopilotKit + AG-UI. "Enterprise" here = CopilotKit's COMMERCIAL surfaces (Premium / CopilotKit Enterprise / Intelligence Platform / paid tiers), NOT CopilotKit running inside a big company. Tracks the commercial product surfaces (from product-surface-scan — Enterprise Intelligence, Cloud, self-host license, threads/persistence tier, Inspector, premium UI/Angular SDK, analytics, security bundle, Slack/Teams), applies the free-vs-paid classifier to decide if an issue belongs here, surfaces cross-page product contradictions, and tracks enterprise questions/complaints, community-sourced prospects (with a sales owner), and enterprise reporters with prior-week trend. Elevated to the top of the weekly report. Runs standalone ("who's at enterprise this week") or invoked by weekly-report. Triggers on "enterprise report", "enterprise signals", "enterprise status", "who at enterprise this week".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured, risk-aware code review of a GitHub pull request using the gh CLI, with diff triage, unresolved-thread suppression, and severity-grouped findings ending in an approve/request-changes verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically find and fix performance problems in applications, frontend and backend, by measuring first. Use this skill whenever the user reports slow endpoints, high latency, poor throughput, memory leaks, large bundles, or slow page loads; wants to profile with cProfile, py-spy, Chrome DevTools, Node --cpu-prof, or perf; run load tests with locust or k6; set performance budgets or SLOs; optimize database queries (EXPLAIN, indexes, N+1); add caching (Redis); improve frontend performance (code splitting, lazy loading, image optimization, memoization, virtualization); or tune the network (CDNs, gzip/br, HTTP/2/3). Also trigger for p50/p95/p99 latency, throughput, error rate, connection pooling, async vs threads, GIL, and memory leak investigations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publishes HTML or Markdown as display.dev URLs with public, company, or private access. Supports signup, claiming, sharing, browsing, bounded reads, exact edits, and comment iteration. Use when the user asks to "publish this", "share this", "share with the org", "post this online", "make a private link", "share with [email]", "publish a report", "list my artifacts", "find an artifact", "publish a large file", "publish this generated HTML file", "read this artifact", "search inside this artifact", "change this passage", "make a copy of this artifact", "duplicate version", "create a display.dev account", "claim this publish", "add a company email domain", "transfer an email domain", "change the email domains add-on", "show my referral link", "show referral rewards", "watch comments on this artifact", "respond to comments", or "resolve this comment thread". Use whenever a request contains a display.dev artifact URL (`*.dsp.so/*`). Anonymous publishing returns a 30-day preview and browser claim URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing .NET concurrency patterns for async I/O, queues, pipelines, or thread safety. Keywords: async/await, channels, dataflow, Rx, lock contention, producer consumer, parallel processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when extracting Voice-of-Customer themes from existing artefacts — GH issues, PR threads, Sentry patterns. Triggers on 'what are users saying', 'recurring complaints', 'top themes'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quando o usuário quiser ajuda para criar, agendar ou otimizar conteúdo de mídia social para LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook ou outras plataformas. Também use quando o usuário mencionar 'post no LinkedIn', 'thread no Twitter', 'mídia social', 'calendário de conteúdo', 'agendamento de redes sociais', 'engajamento' ou 'conteúdo viral'. Esta habilidade cobre criação de conteúdo, reutilização e estratégias específicas por plataforma.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a ready-to-paste social post kit for an app, tool, or project launch or update — "make social posts", "launch posts", "post kit", "prep socials", "promote this". Produces one Markdown file with finished posts for X, Reddit, Instagram, LinkedIn, Threads, and short-form video, plus a pre-post checklist. Pull real facts from the project (repo, release, what it does, OS, links).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch any URL and convert to markdown using baoyu-fetch CLI (Chrome CDP with site-specific adapters). Built-in adapters for X/Twitter, YouTube transcripts, Hacker News threads, and generic pages via Defuddle. Handles login/CAPTCHA via interaction wait modes. Use when user wants to save a webpage as markdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continue dev work on worker tier. Use after thread rotation, turn limits, crashes, or fixing review/security findings. Reads the task file and resumes from the first unchecked task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build real-time chat applications with Azure Communication Services Chat Java SDK. Use when implementing chat threads, messaging, participants, read receipts, typing notifications, or real-time chat features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build Azure AI Foundry agents using the Microsoft Agent Framework Python SDK (agent-framework-azure-ai). Use when creating persistent agents with AzureAIAgentsProvider, using hosted tools (code interpreter, file search, web search), integrating MCP servers, managing conversation threads, or imple...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and analyzes process injection techniques used by malware including classic DLL injection, process hollowing, APC injection, thread hijacking, and reflective loading. Uses memory forensics, API monitoring, and behavioral analysis to identify injection artifacts. Activates for requests involving process injection detection, code injection analysis, hollowed process investigation, or in-memory threat detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain a support docs pack — dedup, length budgets, and no splintering — and land changes as a reviewed pull request. Use when a support thread, or a hand-off from Support assist, surfaces a new resolution, a correction to an existing one, or a deployment quirk worth recording. Not for ordinary code changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Educational single-threaded TypeScript vanity address generator for Solana using @solana/web3.js with async iteration, event-loop yielding, streaming generator API, and best-effort memory zeroization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production-grade multi-threaded Rust vanity address generator for Solana — 100K+ keys/sec using Rayon parallel iterators with solana-sdk, Base58 pattern matching, prefix/suffix support, security-hardened file output, and Criterion benchmarks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full dev cycle. Planning tier for clarify and plan; worker tier after approval for autonomous execution, tiered lint, thread rotation, and feedback fixes. Start every change here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

显式启用或关闭一个受治理 Run 的本地 Codex App Server continuation。仅当用户使用精确命令 `$flight-connect-host` 并依次提供 run_id、thread_id 与 ENABLE 或 DISABLE 时使用；不能把自然语言同意、Lead 判断、UI 操作或已有 credential 当作启用授权。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture volatile session state into a structured handoff document before context is lost. Use when ending a session, switching threads, approaching context limits, or at any juncture the user chooses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Systems Engineering Manual (SEM) v1.0.1. Use for civil-agency systems engineering as the FAA practices it inside the Acquisition Management System (AMS) and the National Airspace System (NAS): the five-phase AMS lifecycle and its decision points; operational concept development and implementation-free functional analysis (ConOps, FFBD/N², CMLs); requirements analysis and architectural design synthesis (PRS→MRS, the PRD ratchet pPRD→iPRD→fPRD, RAM, ISEF/DoDAF views, CPRs); the seven technical management disciplines (Integrated Technical Management/SEMP, Interface Management/IRD-ICD, Risk-Issue-Opportunity, Configuration Management, SE Information Management, Decision Analysis, Verification & Validation); and the specialty disciplines (RMA via Service Threads/STLSC, Life Cycle Engineering, E3/Spectrum, Human Factors, Information Security via the NIST RMF, System Safety via the SMS, and Hazardous Materials/Environmental/EOSH). Scope limits: this is FAA-specific guidance, not policy — it is a tailorable menu that points outward to companion handbooks (FAA-HDBK-006A for RMA, the SMS Manual, the NIST 800-series) rather than restating generic SE theory; it is thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting/FAR law, software-development methodology, named anti-pattern catalogues, and any non-FAA or non-civil-aviation lifecycle. Source has no page numbers in the extracted text (~360 pp.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from FAA-HDBK-006D (2020), the FAA's System Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability (RMA) Handbook for National Airspace System (NAS) hardware and software. Use for RMA figures of merit (MTBF, MTBO, MTTR, the availability variants), the bathtub curve and probability distributions, the four-stage RMA lifecycle mapped to the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS), the six-task RMA technical-management/acquisition process, service-thread criticality and the NAS-RD severity-to-target table, the RMA analysis toolbox (RBD, FMEA/FMECA, FTA, Ishikawa, Monte Carlo, Bayesian, FRACAS, ALT, reliability-growth/recovery tests), software reliability (early prediction + reliability growth), and tailorable example RMA requirements for a Program Requirements Document. Scope limits: it is FAA/NAS-specific guidance (not a requirement, by its own statement), centred on hardware-plus-software availability — it brackets out human/service/facility/communications availability, names but does not reproduce the math derivations or external standards (MIL-STDs, IEEE 1633, RTCA DO-178C/DO-278A, SAE JA1011), is thin on detailed worked numerical examples and on safety-case method, and predates any current revision beyond 006D.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD M&Q BoK (the Manufacturing and Quality Engineering Body of Knowledge), v3.0 of July 2025, published by OUSD(R&E). Use for the manufacturing-and-quality view of the defense acquisition life cycle: what M&Q engineers do across the Adaptive Acquisition Framework phases (Pre-MDD, Materiel Solution Analysis, Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and Deployment, Operations and Support); the twelve M&Q threads (A–L) built on the '5 Ms'; manufacturing feasibility and producibility; Manufacturing Readiness Levels and assessments; Key/Critical Characteristics and process capability (Cp/Cpk, SPC); the standards stack (AS6500, AS9100/ISO 9001, AS9103, AS9145); technical reviews (ASR/PDR/CDR/PRR) and milestone gates; DCMA surveillance; industrial base and supply chain; and sustainment (LCSP, IPS, ILA, ISR). Scope is DoD acquisition M&Q practice on the Major Capability Acquisition path — it is a best-practice compilation, not policy, and is thin on detailed shop-floor process engineering, contract law, and the full text of the cited industry standards (which it names but does not reproduce).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns an engineer's notes, a ticket history or a chat thread into a draft step-by-step runbook with preconditions, stop conditions, numbered steps with checks, verification, rollback and escalation, for the team to validate before use. Commands verbatim, placeholders marked, every gap UNKNOWN; never executes a step or fills a gap from general knowledge. Use when the user asks to "write a runbook from these notes", "turn this resolved ticket into a runbook", "document the steps we ran" or "check this runbook for gaps". Do not use for a business process without commands, use sop-drafter instead; for a knowledge article or known-error record, use knowledge-article-drafter; for the post-incident review, use incident-postmortem-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a set of questions (form exports, helpdesk logs, meeting Q and A, chat threads, a plain list) plus the source documents the user supplies into a DRAFT FAQ grouped by theme: every answer quoted or paraphrased from a named source with a reference, verbatim quotes for dates, figures, eligibility and obligations, UNKNOWN where the sources are silent, a source register with precedence, a conflicts table and a routing list of unanswered questions to owners. Use when the user asks to "build an FAQ from these documents", "answer these questions from the policy", "turn the Q and A into an FAQ page", "group these questions and answer them from the guide" or "what do our documents say about these questions". Do not use for the manager FAQ of a changed HR policy, use policy-change-briefing instead; for checking whether a document's own claims are evidenced, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。