「structure」の検索結果

Integrate on-device AI using Foundation Models framework, Core ML, and open-source LLM runtimes on Apple Silicon. Covers Foundation Models (LanguageModelSession, @Generable, @Guide, SystemLanguageModel, structured output, tool calling), Core ML (coremltools, model conversion, quantization, palettization, pruning, Neural Engine, MLTensor), MLX Swift (transformer inference, unified memory), and llama.cpp (GGUF, cross-platform LLM). Use when building tool-calling AI features, working with guided generation schemas, converting models, or running on-device inference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for Swift Testing: test structure, #expect/#require macros, traits and tags, parameterized tests, test plans, parallel execution, async waiting patterns, and XCTest migration. Use when writing new Swift tests, modernizing XCTest suites, debugging flaky tests, or improving test quality and maintainability in Apple-platform or Swift server projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ground rules for an effective subagent in a loop, workflow, or graph run. Stay in scope, escalate when stuck, return structured results. Use when acting as a subagent, writing subagent prompts, or reviewing delegated agent behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Craft a single, high-quality GitHub issue from a developer's description of a bug, unexpected behavior, or desired enhancement. Walks through reproduction, codebase exploration, and structured drafting so the issue is actionable on arrival. Use when user wants to file an issue, report a bug, request a feature, or document a problem they've encountered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strips AI fingerprints from written text by enforcing banned vocabulary, forbidden sentence structures, and authentic prose patterns. Use when writing articles, documentation, social content, emails, or any text that should read as human-authored rather than AI-generated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured 3-phase peer review of a diff or PR — intent, issues by severity, then pointed merge-readiness questions and a verdict. Use for general code review. Not for AI workflow self-fix-and-edit (ai-systems-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate threat models (adversarial-challenge). Phase 3 asks questions only; it is not the adversarial-challenge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a company-specific job application package from a JD, resume.md, cover letter drafts, HR review, and optional company values input. Use when the user wants 지원 패키지, submission checklist, application folder structure, final answer snippets, email draft support, or safe pre-submission preparation without automatic final submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze a lawsuit", "訴訟分析", "事件分析", "書面分析", "case analysis", "判決分析", "訴訟書類の整理", or wants to extract structured information from litigation documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform transcripts, conversations, or raw notes into shareable content — either multiple social posts OR a single long-form article. Learns style from user's published content. Handles transcripts of any length (tested up to 5500+ lines / 90+ min). Use when user: (1) provides transcript/conversation/recording and wants social content, (2) asks to "turn recording/notes into posts", (3) mentions generating content from recordings/notes, (4) needs multiple publishable pieces from single source, (5) asks to write an article from a transcript — e.g. "write an article/long-form", "organize into an article", "write up this session", "turn this talk into a blog post", "deep dive". Social mode outputs 2-15 ready-to-publish pieces. Article mode outputs a structured long-form piece (3000-10000+ chars) written section-by-section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: writing or reviewing a SKILL.md file, improving skill descriptions, organizing skill content, or needing guidance on skill structure, progressive disclosure, or skill development best practices for Claude Code plugins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: 'intake this repo/skill', 'evaluate external skill', 'should we adopt X', a candidate repo URL plus an adoption question, or any external skill/workflow/tool surfaces as a possible fit for Agistra. Structured front-door evaluation of external skills, workflows, and similar capability artifacts before any install, promotion, or adaptation decision. Ends in exactly one classification: Install candidate, Adapt concept, or Reject. Never install first — intake first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate for any ticket that adds or changes a Supabase migration, environment variable, edge function deployment, or runtime configuration. Ensures infrastructure is live in the target QA environment before state:ready-for-qa.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: a general codebase assessment, pre-migration/pre-rewrite review, or explicit security-focused request needs a structured, repeatable security audit pass covering hardcoded secrets, injection-prone constructs, auth/debug backdoors, and insecure config defaults. Complements (does not replace) the built-in /security-review command. Not a mandatory gate on every ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor SwiftUI view files into stable, testable structure. Use when splitting large views, tightening data flow, or cleaning Observation ownership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off. This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation. Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Game design principles. GDD structure, balancing, player psychology, progression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upstash QStash expert for serverless message queues, scheduled jobs, and reliable HTTP-based task delivery without managing infrastructure. Use when: qstash, upstash queue, serverless cron, scheduled http, message queue serverless.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "automate SQL injection testing," "enumerate database structure," "extract database credentials using sqlmap," "dump tables and columns from a vulnerable database," or "perform automated database penetration testing." It provides comprehensive guidance for using SQLMap to detect and exploit SQL injection vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in building voice AI applications - from real-time voice agents to voice-enabled apps. Covers OpenAI Realtime API, Vapi for voice agents, Deepgram for transcription, ElevenLabs for synthesis, LiveKit for real-time infrastructure, and WebRTC fundamentals. Knows how to build low-latency, production-ready voice experiences. Use when: voice ai, voice agent, speech to text, text to speech, realtime voice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage Claude Code skills following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns, file paths, content patterns), enforcement levels (block, suggest, warn), hook mechanisms (UserPromptSubmit, PreToolUse), session tracking, and the 500-line rule.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in designing effective prompts for LLM-powered applications. Masters prompt structure, context management, output formatting, and prompt evaluation. Use when: prompt engineering, system prompt, few-shot, chain of thought, prompt design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria. Use when implementing features, refactoring, or any multi-step work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Python development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, type hints, project structure. Teaches thinking, not copying.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。