7,773 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Creates a structured bug report from a description, or analyzes code to identify potential bugs. Ensures every bug report has full reproduction steps, severity assessment, and context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for multi-experiment batch operations: QC screening, batch download, comparison, and report generation across many ENCODE experiments simultaneously. Use when users need to process 5+ experiments together, create experiment comparison tables, perform batch quality checks, or generate summary reports. Trigger on: batch analysis, multiple experiments, bulk processing, experiment comparison, batch QC, multi-sample, batch download, experiment table, summary report, collection analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to deploy a local directory or GitHub repository to Volcengine and needs the project analyzed, the app shape understood, and a ranked recommendation across ECS, VKE, and veFaaS before choosing an execution path. Also trigger when the user asks "what deploy mode should I use", "is this repo ready for Volcengine", or "check my repo before deploying". This skill prepares the decision; `volcengine-deploy` skill performs the chosen deployment, and `volcengine-iac` skill is used only when the user chooses Terraform/IaC or the task already has an IaC workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build QA quality dashboards, calculate defect metrics, analyze escape rates, and produce quality trend reports. Use this skill whenever a QA lead or manager needs to measure and communicate quality outcomes. Trigger on phrases like "quality metrics", "defect density", "escape rate", "bug trends", "quality dashboard", "sprint quality report", "test coverage metrics", "QA KPIs", "how is quality trending", "defect leakage", "production bugs this quarter", "mean time to detect", "quality scorecard", or any request to quantify, visualize, or report on the quality of a product or testing process. Also trigger when a manager asks "how is QA performing?" or an engineering lead asks "what does our defect data tell us?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure and run effective 1:1 meetings with direct reports using Camille Fournier's Manager's Path and Andy Grove's High Output Management frameworks. Use when a manager says "help me structure my 1:1s", "my 1:1s feel like status updates", "I don't know what to talk about in 1:1s", "my reports don't open up", "how do I make 1:1s useful", "what questions should I ask in 1:1s", or "I need a 1:1 template". Also trigger when someone mentions their 1:1s feel transactional, that they keep canceling them, or that they're not sure if their report is happy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set a repo up to prove engineering-task work actually works before it ships. Investigates the repo, ensures a one-command dev stack (`dev-local`) exists, asks whether verification runs locally or in a sandbox (crabbox), confirms/installs the driver (the `playwright-cli` skill for web by default). Outputs three artifacts: a committed `/verify` skill (per-task verification SOP — spawn a verifier sub-agent → drive the app → screenshot/video proof → open a PR with the proof embedded), the `/dev-local` skill + script, and the installed driver skill. Use when someone says "set up verification", "make this repo verifiable", "scaffold a verify skill", "set up the verifier".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a repo's agent context — CLAUDE.md files, codebase docs, skills, and tool/MCP designs — against Anthropic's Claude 5 context-engineering guidance ("unhobbling": Anthropic cut ~80% of Claude Code's system prompt with no eval loss). Finds overconstraint, conflicting instructions, redundancy, stale facts, and missing "unknown knowns"; produces a scored findings report with concrete rewrites, then applies approved fixes. Use when someone says "audit my CLAUDE.md", "context audit", "unhobble this repo", "review our agent docs/skills/tools", or after upgrading to Claude 5-generation models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages Google Analytics reporting data, enables the Analytics Data API via the Cloud CLI, and creates reports using the Google Analytics Data API (v1beta). Use when you need to interact with Google Analytics properties, run customized analytics reports, query metrics (like activeUsers, screenPageViews) and dimensions (like city, date), check metrics and dimensions compatibility, or verify API enablement. Don't use for Google Analytics Admin API operations (e.g., creating properties, managing users) or for front-end tracking installation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn Caveman's exact report-only repository observations into an operator-chosen optimization candidate with a paired baseline/candidate evaluation. Use when the user asks to inspect an optimization observation, evaluate a candidate change, or act on the current Caveman optimization report. Require a logged-in Caveman CLI connection and explicit approval; never infer money or actuation from a profile.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts `--from-quality <report>` or `--from-test <report>` to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists. Modes (pick one): --fast (trivial errors — lint, type, build — skip scout and review), --hard (mandatory review, no auto-approve).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts `--from-quality <report>` or `--from-test <report>` to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists. Modes (pick one): --fast (trivial errors — lint, type, build — skip scout and review), --hard (mandatory review, no auto-approve).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design guidance for program outcome measurement in Salesforce nonprofit orgs: logic model structure, indicator taxonomy, impact reporting design, and grant compliance reporting using NPSP Program Management Module (PMM) or Nonprofit Cloud (NPC) Outcome Management. NOT for configuring PMM programs, cohorts and service deliveries - use admin/npsp-program-management. NOT for setting up grant tracking, funding awards and disbursements - use admin/grant-management-setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, revise, render, or visually audit Quiet Signal A4 long-form PDF reports from source material using editable HTML/CSS, source-backed content, and full-page rendering QA. Use for detailed reports; not for slides or Xiaohongshu summaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suggest relevant GitHub Copilot skills from the awesome-copilot repository based on current repository context and chat history, avoiding duplicates with existing skills in this repository, and identifying outdated skills that need updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suggest relevant GitHub Copilot Custom Agents files from the awesome-copilot repository based on current repository context and chat history, avoiding duplicates with existing custom agents in this repository, and identifying outdated agents that need updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suggest relevant GitHub Copilot instruction files from the awesome-copilot repository based on current repository context and chat history, avoiding duplicates with existing instructions in this repository, and identifying outdated instructions that need updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic QA testing for web applications, desktop apps, and workflows. Three tiers: QUICK (critical/high severity only — 5 min), STANDARD (+ medium severity — 15 min), EXHAUSTIVE (+ cosmetic — 30+ min). Tests user flows, finds bugs, reports with severity classification, and optionally auto-fixes with atomic commits. Produces before/after health scores and ship-readiness summary. Use when user says "test this", "QA", "find bugs", "does this work?", or "is it ready to ship?". Voice triggers: "quality check", "run QA", "test the app". For report-only (no fixes), use with --report-only flag.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score a repository's agentic legibility from repo-visible evidence only. Use when Codex needs to audit how easy a codebase is for coding agents to discover, bootstrap, validate, and navigate, especially for harness-engineering reviews, developer-experience audits, repo cleanup, or before/after comparisons after improving docs, tooling, or architectural constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structures a vague engineering request into a well-scoped task brief before any implementation begins. Use when the user has an engineering goal but the ask is missing which repos are in scope, what "done" means, constraints, or open questions. Triggers on "shape this", "scope this out", "frame this work", "write a brief for", "I want to build" (with unclear scope), or the /shape slash command. Produces a filled task template (multi-repo feature, single-repo change, investigation, or bugfix). Not for already-scoped work — go straight to execution. If the domain is unclear, ask one qualifying question before routing — for marketing intake see marketing-shaper, game-design intake see game-design-shaper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting work in a repository under repositories/ that may lack CI configuration. Detects missing CI workflows (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI) and alerts the user to add one. Skips repos marked as research-only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Install Codex skills into $CODEX_HOME/skills from a curated list or a GitHub repo path. Use when a user asks to list installable skills, install a curated skill, or install a skill from another repo (including private repos).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bootstrap self-improving Symphony + Linear orchestration for a software repository. Use when Codex needs to inspect a repo, review or generate repo-local guidance, shape Linear issues, render a Symphony workflow, launch a high-leverage first execution wave, or run an orchestrator-led review, recovery, and learnings loop that makes future runs better.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesizes multiple case summaries into one unified Case Summary Report. Triggers when the user has two or more case summaries, document analyses, or memoranda and needs them consolidated into a single report with patterns, contradictions, and gaps identified.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a post-judgment asset and enforcement report synthesizing debtor asset investigations, exemption analysis, fraudulent transfer assessment, and prioritized collection strategies. Use when preparing judgment enforcement plans, debtor asset profiles, collection status reports, or post-trial recovery analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。