738 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when designing, reviewing, modifying, migrating, optimizing, securing, operating, troubleshooting, or decommissioning data architectures across data model exploration, SQL, ISO SQL conformance, NoSQL, vector, graph, document, time-series, NewSQL, search, in-memory, SQLite, CDC/Debezium, DBMS storage/query/recovery internals, database incident prevention, hardware acceleration, cache, big-data, lakehouse, and warehouse systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, implementing, reviewing, debugging, testing, profiling, or porting concurrent, parallel, distributed, high-performance, network dataplane, kernel-bypass, or real-time software, including locks, semaphores, monitors, MPI, CSP rendezvous, DPDK, VPP, eBPF, XDP, AF_XDP, SR-IOV, RSS, RoCEv2/RDMA, RMS/EDF, priority inversion, and environment selection from silicon to edge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from FAA-STD-025f (Preparation of Interface Documentation). Use for IRD/ICD family definitions, common format and content, IRD shall-requirements, ICD design characteristics, verification/VRTM, and CM/revision/approval of FAA Enterprise Subsystem interfaces. Covers rev F preparation rules only; does not replace FAA-STD-005 drawing/spec prep, Order 1800.66 full CM procedures, or non-FAA interface standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design. Use when the user says "grill me", "grill mich", "grill mich zu diesem Plan", or explicitly invokes /grill-me. Does NOT fire on generic "review this", "poke holes", "stress-test", "devil's advocate" or "critique" phrasing -- for reviewing an already-written artifact (code, PR, paper) use code-review, 3agenten-review, 7phasen-review or caveman-review instead; grill-me interrogates a still-open plan or idea before it is built.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs a pre-launch evaluation plan for a declarative agent from its instructions text, skills, capabilities, knowledge sources and sample requests: a behaviour contract of testable statements quoted from the text, test prompts by scenario family and tier with setup, expected behaviour, pass and fail criteria and red flags, a red-flag catalogue, a blank scoring sheet, a coverage table and a go or no-go checklist the owner completes and decides. Use when the user asks to "write test cases for my agent", "how do I evaluate this agent before launch", "build a test plan for the agent", "what should I check before publishing this agent" or "give me a go no-go checklist". Do not use for finding injection or leakage exposures in the instructions, use agent-instructions-red-team instead; do not use for reviewing one SKILL.md, use skill-file-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a DRAFT course outline from a training need and audience: learning objectives with an observable verb, condition and standard, modules in a stated order with a duration basis and sources, activities and an assessment plan aligned objective by objective, and a coverage table showing what each objective still lacks. Never sets a pass mark, declares learners competent or invents content. Use when the user asks to "build a course outline", "design a training programme for", "turn this need into modules and objectives", "draft the curriculum for this workshop" or "what should this training cover". Do not use for quiz items from finished content, use training-quiz-builder instead; for needs from surveys and manager notes, use training-needs-synthesis; for a new starter's first weeks, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a DRAFT interface register between disciplines or parties from meeting notes, action lists and drawings or document lists: one row per interface with the requesting and providing party, the information needed, the related document number, the need-by date with its source, the status as minuted and a quoted source, plus UNKNOWN and questions where the notes are silent. Never sets a date, rates priority, assigns ownership beyond what the notes state or closes an interface. Use when the user asks to "build an interface register from these minutes", "list the interfaces between piping and civil", "who owes what to whom on this package", "update the interface register from this week's meeting" or "turn these action items into an interface list". Do not use for recording a design or document change raised in a meeting, use management-of-change-intake instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover and execute specialized skills from a curated marketplace catalog on GitHub, fetched on-demand and run ephemerally (no permanent installation). The catalog covers a broad and growing range — document generation (PDF/Word/Excel/PowerPoint), visual design, presentations, web app testing, animated GIFs, dev tooling (MCP scaffolding, frontend components), creative outputs (algorithmic art), technical documentation lookup (library/API/framework references), and more. Consult this skill whenever the user asks for a capability that could plausibly be covered by a community skill — the catalog is the source of truth, not this description.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design custom action/filter hooks emitted by a plugin: action vs filter semantics, prefixed names, docblocks, parameter stability, *_ref_array forwarding, and deprecated hook migration. Use when adding, reviewing, evolving, or deprecating a public hook surface. Triggers on do_action, apply_filters, apply_filters_deprecated, do_action_deprecated, apply_filters_ref_array, do_action_ref_array, did_action, did_filter, or hook @since docblocks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and reviews the internal architecture of a WordPress plugin — folder layout, PSR-4 one-class-per-file discipline, Schema/Constants placement, composition-root vs singleton decisions, conditional asset enqueueing, script config via wp_add_inline_script, and prefixed custom-hook naming. Use when scaffolding includes/src, reviewing class organization, asset enqueue code, repeated strings, or "should I make this a singleton" decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and review native DTOs in WordPress plugins without requiring better-data - immutable data carriers, explicit from_array hydration, strict coercion instead of unchecked casts, WP_Error validation failures, sensitive-field discipline, nested DTO arrays, and clear separation from repositories, WP models, presenters, REST controllers, and HTML views. Use when a plugin introduces FooDto, request DTOs, settings DTOs, value objects, admin-row data shapes, REST response source objects, or when reviewing code that passes raw arrays, stdClass, WP_Post, WC_Order, $_POST, post meta, or option arrays through multiple layers. Mentions better-data only as an optional higher-level library; this skill is for native implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply when designing types, reviewing a function signature, or writing code in any statically-typed language. Make illegal states unrepresentable, brand semantic primitives, parse external data at boundaries, refuse to lie to the compiler, exhaust variants, derive from authoritative schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating, editing, reviewing, packaging, or organizing AI-agent skills and deciding whether a skill should be text-only, script-backed, or backed by an ML/specialist pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforces error handling standards: silent error prohibition, custom error class hierarchy (AppError base with category never-fallback / transient / permanent, cause preservation, ValidationError / UnauthorizedError / UpstreamError etc. — canonical definitions in PATTERNS.md), external-boundary normalization (normalizeExternalError), Result pattern (Result.ok/Result.fail), proper try-catch with error type checking, structured error logging with a single Logger contract, fallback prohibition categories (isNeverFallback), and HTTP status code mapping. Use when implementing error handling, reviewing catch blocks, or designing error responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies battle-tested clean code principles to writing, reviewing, and refactoring code. Covers naming, functions, comments, error handling, class design, and the critical difference between clever code and clear code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Activate this skill when BenchmarkDotNet (BDN) is involved in the task — creating, running, configuring, or reviewing BDN benchmarks. Also activate when microbenchmarking .NET code would be useful and BenchmarkDotNet is the likely tool. Consider activating when answering a .NET performance question requires measurement and BenchmarkDotNet may be needed. Covers microbenchmark design, BDN configuration and project setup, how to run BDN microbenchmarks efficiently and effectively, and using BDN for side-by-side performance comparisons. Do NOT use for profiling/tracing .NET code (dotnet-trace, PerfView), production telemetry, or load/stress testing (Crank, k6).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understand the constraints a design was built under and evaluate quality within that context. Use when reviewing work that had limited time, budget, or team size, or when assessing whether constraints were handled well.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal. Channels a senior dev who has seen everything: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Use on ANY coding task: writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, reviewing, or designing code, and choosing libraries or dependencies. Also use whenever the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "lazy mode", "simplest solution", "minimal solution", "yagni", "do less", or "shortest path", or complains about over-engineering, bloat, boilerplate, or unnecessary dependencies. Do NOT use for non-coding requests (general knowledge, prose, translation, summaries, recipes).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Postgres performance optimization and best practices from Supabase. Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or optimizing Postgres queries, schema designs, or database configurations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Liquid Glass material best practices for SwiftUI, UIKit, and AppKit on iOS 26+/macOS 26+ (Tahoe) through iOS 27/macOS 27. Use when implementing, reviewing, or migrating to glass: glassEffect, Glass variants (.regular/.clear/.identity), tint, interactive(), GlassEffectContainer, glassEffectUnion, toolbar glass, ToolbarSpacer, scrollEdgeEffectStyle, sharedBackgroundVisibility, tabBarMinimizeBehavior, backgroundExtensionEffect, NSGlassEffectView, UIGlassEffect, Tahoe window chrome, glass accessibility (Reduce Transparency/Increase Contrast), pre-26 Material fallbacks, UIDesignRequiresCompatibility. Also fires on symptoms: glass renders dark or muddy, glass looks like a flat tinted rectangle, glass button doesn't register taps, tap passes through glass, "'glassEffect' is only available in iOS 26.0 or newer", "ambiguous use of 'opacity'", "'cornerRadius' was deprecated", glass looks different in simulator vs device, screenshots of glass UI don't match. For glass animation, morphing, glassEffectID, transitions, Metal shaders, or performance profiling use the liquid-glass-motion skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project code patterns and conventions. Auto-loads when implementing, designing, verifying, or reviewing code. Provides detailed pattern definitions with code examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Current attested Codex, Claude Code, and Agent Skills extension contracts for skilltap. Use when designing, implementing, reviewing, or documenting harness adapters; plugin or marketplace manifests; native plugin lifecycle; skill directories or SKILL.md frontmatter; AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md bridges; configuration scopes; compatibility transfer; adoption, reconciliation, status, or update behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent Ready project design context for navigation, docs links, and interface tone. Use when building or reviewing UI in this repo so patterns match the documented product feel.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Postgres performance optimization and best practices from Supabase. Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or optimizing Postgres queries, schema designs, or database configurations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。