「boundary」の検索結果

Review framework vs host ownership for permissions, approvals, grants, native execution, storage, daemons, and Clawix integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI demos and GPU compute with Gradio Spaces and Hugging Face Spaces ZeroGPU. Use when writing or reviewing code that uses `@spaces.GPU`, configuring `python_version` or `requirements.txt` for a ZeroGPU Space, or handling ZeroGPU-specific code constraints — pickle-based process isolation, `gr.State` semantics across the worker boundary, no `torch.compile` (use AoTI instead), CUDA wheel-only builds (no `nvcc` at build or runtime), large vs xlarge sizing, and dynamic duration callables. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user mentions ZeroGPU, `@spaces.GPU`, or the `spaces` Python package, or hits ZeroGPU-specific code errors like `PicklingError` across the worker boundary, `illegal duration`, or `flash-attn` wheel-build failures — even when the user does not explicitly ask for ZeroGPU coding guidance. Trigger on `import spaces` or `@spaces.GPU` in code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TanStack Query (React Query) v5 (@tanstack/react-query) の API リファレンス。 useQuery, useQueries, useInfiniteQuery, useMutation, useSuspenseQuery, QueryClient, QueryClientProvider, queryOptions, HydrationBoundary, invalidateQueries, prefetchQuery, staleTime, gcTime, placeholderData, optimistic updates, SSR / hydration, persistQueryClient, eslint-plugin-query。 kubb（フック生成側）とは別。

React Router v8 (Framework Mode、旧 Remix) の RR8 リファレンス。 loader, action, middleware, routes.ts、hooks (useLoaderData, useActionData, useFetcher, useNavigate, useNavigation, useParams, useSearchParams)、 コンポーネント (Form, Link, NavLink, Outlet, Route, Routes, Await)、SSR / SPA / Static、 ErrorBoundary, redirect, defer, session, matchPath, matchRoutes, type-safe routing。 TanStack Router (@tanstack/react-router) とは別ライブラリ。

リファクタリングを「更新されたチームの理解と、コードが表現する過去の理解の差分同期」と捉え、今回得た新知識（要求・ドメイン知識・制約）が naming と responsibility へ反映されているか、boundary が現在の understanding を表現しているか、diff の削除行やコメントに現れる過去の design history と constraint を失っていないかを diff-time で確認する。Knowledge Delta の signal は diff（追加/削除された hunk・コメント・ADR 参照）を一次情報とし、PR 本文が供給されるときは補助に用い、不確実なら question に留める。ドメイン用語の一貫性は ubiquitous-language-naming、集約/コンテキスト境界の設計判断は bounded-context-language、投機的抽象化・caller special-case は altitude-generalization、スコープ逸脱/前提破壊は fix-scope-integrity、振る舞い変更と構造変更の分離は behavior-structure-separation、完了主張の反証は refactor-claim-audit へ委譲する

Identifies non-coding RNAs (tRNA, rRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, riboswitches, sRNAs) using Infernal covariance-model search against Rfam, tRNAscan-SE 2.0 for tRNA, barrnap for rRNA, and ARAGORN for tmRNA, plus the small-RNA-seq boundary for miRNA and the transcript-assembly boundary for lncRNA. Covers the structure-conserved-not-sequence-conserved principle (why BLAST fails), GA-threshold and clan-competition correctness, tRNAscan-SE domain modes and pseudogene flags, rDNA copy-number collapse, and why homology annotation is a recall floor. Use when performing genome-wide ncRNA annotation, choosing the right tool for an RNA class, or interpreting ncRNA counts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Introduce the cross-section read interface boundary (I<Section>ServiceRead) for one section's service per memory/architecture/section-read-write-split.md. Audits the surface, evaluates which methods belong on the read interface, sets up the workspace, dispatches a subagent that introduces the interface and migrates non-section callers, opens a PR. Use when the user says 'read split for X', 'split <Section>Service', 'add I<Section>ServiceRead boundary', 'apply the section-read-write-split rule to <Section>', or any variation of carving the cross-section read surface out of a section's full service interface. Reference implementation is Teams (PR 678). Operates on one section per invocation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design stable APIs and module boundaries — contract-first types, consistent errors, boundary validation, additive changes. Load when designing REST or GraphQL endpoints, public module interfaces, component props, or FE/BE contracts. Also triggers on "API design", "interface design", "design the API", "module boundary", "API contract", "define the interface". Complements feature-spec (product layer). Routes breaking retirement to api-deprecation-and-migration when it exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies non-coding RNAs (tRNA, rRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, riboswitches, sRNAs) using Infernal covariance-model search against Rfam, tRNAscan-SE 2.0 for tRNA, barrnap for rRNA, and ARAGORN for tmRNA, plus the small-RNA-seq boundary for miRNA and the transcript-assembly boundary for lncRNA. Covers the structure-conserved-not-sequence-conserved principle (why BLAST fails), GA-threshold and clan-competition correctness, tRNAscan-SE domain modes and pseudogene flags, rDNA copy-number collapse, and why homology annotation is a recall floor. Use when performing genome-wide ncRNA annotation, choosing the right tool for an RNA class, or interpreting ncRNA counts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide whether a request is scope creep — "is this in scope", "is this scope creep", "should I push back on this client request", "draft a boundary reply". Returns in-scope, creep or grey-zone with a suggested reply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design resilient React error handling with Error Boundaries, Sentry integration, recovery UI, retry patterns, and graceful degradation. Activate on: error boundary, crash recovery, Sentry, error fallback UI, retry logic, unhandled exceptions. NOT for: form validation errors (use form-validation-architect), API error codes (use api-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit or design server-side indexes, directories, reputations, or aggregates that are DERIVED from traffic a platform witnesses (chain heads, run verdicts, heartbeats, publish activity) so that consent gates the derivation, not merely the read: no shadow index over non-consenting principals, post-consent-only evidence windows, retention bounds and delete-propagation into derived rows, activity-oracle threat modeling, and audit-logged ranking discretion. Use when building a capability directory / whois from witnessed activity, a reputation ledger from settled outcomes, vitals aggregation across tenants, or any "the yellow pages can't lie because they index signatures" feature. Keywords: shadow index, derived index, consent gates derivation, activity oracle, phone book not a log, delist propagation, ranking weight audit, k-anonymous aggregate, subpoena surface. NOT for the consent-screen UX and scope-ladder mechanics themselves (use local-first-tenancy-boundary), reputation scoring math and Sybil economics (use agent-identity-continuity-reputation), or discovery-layer architecture L1/L2/L3 (use agent-discovery-directories-guilds).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inventory and govern a project's test assets. Connect requirements, business rules, risks, bugs, and cross-boundary contracts to stable TEST-IDs and executable evidence in the repository's existing test registry or TESTS.md. Use for test inventory, test gap analysis, unit/integration/contract/E2E/smoke classification, bug-to-test regression protection, consumer/provider contract testing, test-necessity review, and pre-delivery evidence review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Govern stable domain context with a narrowly scoped CONTEXT.md when needed, and route hard-to-reverse decisions to ECC's existing architecture-decision-records skill. Use when domain terms require repeated explanation, one term has multiple meanings, unclear language causes module-boundary mistakes, or domain semantics must remain separate from architecture decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reactの画面部品やフックを、利用者の操作と表示結果に沿ってテストします。通信の模擬やアクセシビリティ確認、実ブラウザーで検証する範囲の判断も支援します。

• Reactのフォームや部品のテスト追加
• 独自フックと非同期更新の検証
• APIの成功・失敗応答を模擬したいとき

Pythonのテストをpytestで設計・作成し、共通の準備処理や外部サービスの代役、複数入力の検証、テストで確認したコードの範囲の測定まで扱うスキル。

• Pythonの機能をテストから作りたいとき
• テストの準備処理を共通化したいとき
• 外部APIをモックで検証したいとき

H100やH200のGPU在庫を調べ、固定料金の見積もり依頼や調達状況を確認します。端末の認証解除と、明示的な許可に基づくノード検証にも対応します。

• H100やH200の在庫確認
• 固定料金の見積もりを依頼したいとき
• 見積もりや調達の進捗確認

TypeScript、Python、Goのエラー処理を設計・見直すスキル。エラーの分類、再試行、APIの応答、利用者向けの案内文を整理します。

• 新しいサービスのエラー分類の設計
• 外部サービスの一時障害を再試行したいとき
• APIのエラー応答とログの見直し

実在するファイルや行番号を参照した段階的なコード案内をCodeTour形式で作成し、新任者の学習、設計の理解、PRレビュー、障害原因の調査に役立てるスキル。

• 新しい保守担当者向けのコード案内
• 設計や機能の処理経路を理解したいとき
• PRの変更を順番にレビューしたいとき

Clear the freeze boundary set by /freeze, allowing edits to all directories again. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate domain boundaries -- detect cross-context import violations and aggregate invariant issues. Use when auditing a DDD codebase for leaks between bounded contexts, before merging cross-cutting changes, or as a CI gate to catch boundary erosion early.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up integration testing for a frontend-backend API boundary, evaluating whether two services are safe to deploy independently, or replacing slow end-to-end tests with contract tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts genomic intervals between coordinate conventions, normalises and compares variant representations, and detects assembly or contig-naming mismatches before they corrupt an analysis. Used whenever coordinates cross a format, tool, or assembly boundary - converting between BED, GFF/GTF, VCF, SAM/BAM, WIG, PSL, genePred, Picard interval_list, or region strings; reconciling 0-based half-open with 1-based inclusive; left-aligning or trimming indels; checking whether two variant records describe the same change; mapping genomic to transcript, CDS, or protein positions; auditing a BED/GTF/VCF for convention violations; or diagnosing GRCh37 vs hg19 vs GRCh38 vs T2T, chr-prefix, and liftover problems. Triggers include "off by one", "0-based", "1-based", "half-open", "coordinate system", "left-align", "normalize variant", "bcftools norm", "chr prefix", "wrong genome build", "liftover", "REF mismatch", and "HGVS".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for prompt-injection, retrieval poisoning, memory contamination, planner drift, MCP or tool-boundary abuse, and agent exfiltration challenges. Use when the user asks to analyze prompt injection, retrieval poisoning, memory contamination, planner drift, tool-argument corruption, or secret exposure caused by an agent chain. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。