4,572 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Record and track organizational decisions using the RAPID framework. Captures decision context, options analysis, RAPID roles, risk assessment, and communication plan. Use when making cross-functional decisions, documenting governance choices, or building an auditable decision trail.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a weighted decision matrix to evaluate options. Use when the user says "decision matrix", "compare options", "weighted scoring", "which option should we choose", "evaluate alternatives", "Wiegers priority matrix", "force field analysis", "decision table", "trade-off analysis", "option comparison" - even if they don't explicitly say "decision matrix".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when building, reviewing, or refreshing a RACI (Responsible / Accountable / Consulted / Informed) matrix for a Salesforce project so that every Salesforce-specific decision — data model change, automation tier choice, security model, integration boundary, deployment, license/edition — has exactly one accountable owner and a documented escalation path that downstream agents can route to. Trigger keywords: RACI matrix salesforce project, stakeholder authority salesforce, escalation path salesforce decisions, who approves data model change, salesforce decision rights, REFUSAL_NEEDS_HUMAN_REVIEW routing. NOT for the change advisory board operating model itself (use admin/change-management-and-deployment). NOT for end-user training rollout plans (use admin/change-management-and-training). NOT for the technical mechanics of permission set assignment authority (use admin/permission-set-architecture). NOT for pure stakeholder requirements elicitation (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). More trigger keywords: who approves a sandbox refresh, who signs off a data load, release update activation owner, delegated admin authority vs RACI, multi-org decision rights, escalation time-box.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured multi-criteria decision analysis for ranking options with weights, constraints, confidence, tradeoff reasoning, sensitivity analysis, and explainable recommendations. Use when the user asks for decision support, MCDA, weighted scoring, prioritization, vendor selection, route planning, hiring shortlist ranking, tool comparison, procurement decisions, or auditable agent decision logic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply recognition-primed decision making to agents operating under time pressure, uncertainty, and ambiguous cues. Use for situation assessment, RPD-style action selection, and decision-support design in operational settings. NOT for batch optimization, static planning with full information, or tasks where exhaustive search is cheap and harmless.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns past decisions into calibrated judgment - scoring old predictions against what happened, assigning credit for delayed results, and separating a bad decision from a good decision that lost. Use during a retrospective, postmortem, quarterly or monthly review, when reviewing decisions taken 30+ days ago, when attributing a result to a cause, or when someone claims to have called something.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a vague "what should we do about X" into a scored decision - explicit actions, an explicit unknown, an explicit prior, and one utility scale - then picks by maximum expected utility and checks the result for framing effects. Use when facing a choice between options under uncertainty, when a decision has stalled in circular debate, when someone asks "should we do A or B", or before writing any decision record, strategy memo, or roadmap commitment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep decision maps as concise routers from decisions to canonical documents and validation guardrails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extrem kurzes, substantielles Ausgabe-FORMAT fuer EINE Entscheidung oder Entscheidungsgruppe, wenn die dahinterstehende Analyse bereits existiert (im Chat entstanden, aus `decide`, aus `decision-briefing`, aus einem Ticket oder Dokument): Kontext in 2-3 Zeilen, Pro/Contra je Option als Stichpunkte im paveman/caveman-reduzierten Stil, Talking Points, eine begruendete Empfehlung, und ein Pfad/Link zur Vollanalyse zum Komplett-Nachlesen. Nutze diesen Skill bei "gib mir das kurz mit Pro Contra und Empfehlung", "executive summary zur Entscheidung", "kurzkontext zu <Thema>", "fass die Entscheidung X in einer Kurzform zusammen", /decision-shot, oder wenn ein Ergebnis an jemanden weitergereicht werden soll, der nur die Essenz braucht, nicht die volle Herleitung. NICHT nutzen, um viele offene Entscheidungen zu SAMMELN und per Buchstabe abzufragen -- das macht decision-briefing; NICHT nutzen, um eine Entscheidung erst zu ANALYSIEREN -- das macht decide. decision-shot setzt eine fertige Analyse voraus und komprimiert nur deren Praesentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold course exercise directories with numbered sections, exercise variants, required readmes, and repo-specific validation. Use when creating exercise stubs, adding a course section, or safely renaming exercises.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates Architecture Decision Records documenting key technical decisions with context, alternatives considered, tradeoffs, consequences, and decision owners. Use when documenting "architecture decisions", "technical choices", "design decisions", or "ADRs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decision tree analysis for complex decision-making across all domains. Use when user needs to evaluate multiple options with uncertain outcomes, assess risk/reward scenarios, or structure choices systematically. Applicable to business, investment, personal decisions, operations, career choices, product strategy, and any situation requiring structured evaluation. Triggers include decision tree, should I, what if, evaluate options, compare alternatives, risk analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply recognition-primed decision making to agents operating under time pressure, uncertainty, and ambiguous cues. Use for situation assessment, RPD-style action selection, and decision-support design in operational settings. NOT for batch optimization, static planning with full information, or tasks where exhaustive search is cheap and harmless.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply recognition-primed decision making to agents operating under time pressure, uncertainty, and ambiguous cues. Use for situation assessment, RPD-style action selection, and decision-support design in operational settings. NOT for batch optimization, static planning with full information, or tasks where exhaustive search is cheap and harmless.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
計画やアイデアを質問で掘り下げ、決定同士の依存関係を整理します。推奨案を添えた質問を段階的に重ね、曖昧な前提や未決事項を確認して共通理解を築くスキルです。
Govern stable domain context with a narrowly scoped CONTEXT.md when needed, and route hard-to-reverse decisions to ECC's existing architecture-decision-records skill. Use when domain terms require repeated explanation, one term has multiple meanings, unclear language causes module-boundary mistakes, or domain semantics must remain separate from architecture decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn messy user research notes, interviews, support tickets, surveys, and product context into an evidence-backed decision room: a single HTML artifact with an evidence ledger, theme map, confidence heatmap, opportunity matrix, decision memo, and experiment queue. Use when teams need to move from qualitative signals to product or design decisions without fabricating certainty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) to document significant architectural choices and their rationale for future team members. Use when the user says "write an ADR", "document this decision", "record why we chose X", "add an architecture decision record", "create an ADR for", or wants to capture the reasoning behind a technical choice so the team understands it later. Do NOT use when the decision hasn't been made yet (use create-rfc instead), for implementation planning (use technical-design-doc-creator), or for general documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Deep dive before a decision: deep research engine - grounding for specs and decisions: study open-source reference implementations with pinned refs, gather live web evidence with citation discipline, verify contested claims, and distill a decision-grounding dossier that planning consumes; for a decision brief use research-brief, for upstream guidance use web-research. Use when the user says: research plan, literature review, research literature, review recent papers, deep research, deep-research, exhaustive research, saturation research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Uncertain technical choice for a spike: bounded decision prototype workflow: resolve one uncertain interaction, API, performance, or integration choice with a disposable, isolated experiment whose observed result feeds planning. Use when the user says: decision-prototype, decision prototype, prototype this uncertain choice before planning, prototype before planning, prototype the uncertain choice, run a small spike, small spike, spike solution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
dontbesilent 个人决策系统。把任何一个需要长期跟踪的领域（业务、关系、健康、职业、学习、投资……）做成一个本地知识工程：四层结构、来源标签、写完不改的快照、能炼出规律的概念库。 触发方式：/dbs-decision、/决策系统、/决策立案、/结果回填、/状态画像 Personal decision system. Turns any long-running domain into a local knowledge project with four layers, source tags, immutable snapshots, and a concept library that learns patterns over time. Trigger: /dbs-decision, /决策系统, /决策立案, /结果回填, /状态画像
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a family meeting to make a big care decision together. Use when asked help me run a family meeting about care, we need to decide together about mom's care, my siblings and I disagree about our parent, or facilitate a care decision. Produces an agenda and structure for the meeting, how to prepare (facts, options, everyone's input), ground rules to keep old family dynamics from derailing it, how to include the person being cared for, ways to work through disagreement toward a decision, and clear next steps with owners. Not legal, medical, or financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。