「credibility」の検索結果

Run fair, transparent raffles and sweepstakes. Randomly select winners from participant lists with verification and documentation for credibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts the "Interest of Amicus Curiae" section of an amicus brief. Establishes institutional credibility, tethers the amicus's interest to the specific legal question, articulates non-party impacts, and embeds disclosure guardrails under FRAP 29 and Supreme Court Rule 37. Trigger when drafting amicus briefs, friend-of-the-court filings, interest statements, amicus disclosures, or when the user asks why an organization belongs in a case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs subgroup and heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) analyses for clinical trials. Covers Mantel-Haenszel pooling, Breslow-Day, interaction tests in regression, RERI for additive interaction, modern data-adaptive HTE methods (STEPP, SIDES, causal forests, X/R-learners), Bayesian shrinkage (Dixon-Simon, MAP, EXNEX), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), and credibility frameworks (Sun BMJ, EMA 2019). Use when analyzing treatment effects across patient subgroups for regulatory submissions or precision-medicine claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Digital Engineering Acquisition Framework Handbook (NASA-HDBK-1004). Use for acquiring digital/model-based data under contract: the Data Requirements Description (DRD) instrument and the Appendix A DRD suite (TDP, MBx, CDMP, CSA, CR, FCA/PCA, SDT, EMDAL, REF, MRI); the Data Type 1-5 control scale; SOW/RFP/Cost-Volume contract language and data rights (FAR/DFARS, Table 3 license categories); the Requirements Exchange Format (REF/ReqIF, UUID schema) and Master Records Index; model-based data definition (MBSE, CAD/PMI, M&S credibility, BOM, release-state mapping, PLM); digital data collaboration, the four owned architectures, and interoperability standards (MIL-STD-31000, STEP/ISO 10303, ASME Y14); the four MBE interoperability use cases; and MBE Plan development. Scope is the acquisition and contracting side of digital engineering. Does not reproduce ISO/STEP/ASME/MIL-STD/SAE standard text, and the companion NASA-HDBK-1009A carries the deeper digital-engineering practitioner detail this handbook defers to.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing domain authority, trust, or citation credibility; runs a peer-relative 40-item CITE profile with evidence coverage and verified manipulation/penalty veto checks. Not for page-level content quality — use content-quality-auditor; not for backlink profiling alone — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 域名权威/网站可信度

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and run the owner's self-branding system in a structured way across LinkedIn, Substack, dev.to, X, profile rewrites, recurring series, and comment strategy. Use when the owner asks for positioning, a branding plan, profile updates, content drafts, a publishing sequence, comment ideas, or help maintaining a consistent public voice. Optimize for operator credibility: specific experience, defensible numbers, concrete artifacts, and category ownership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates publish-ready LinkedIn posts for B2B SaaS marketing leaders writing from an operator point of view: real decisions, real trade-offs, real constraints, and defensible lessons. Use when turning an internal observation, framework, campaign decision, miss, or shipped artifact into a public LinkedIn post. Best for demand generation, ABM, marketing ops, product marketing, and SaaS GTM leaders building credibility through practical operating insight. Not intended for generic brand posts, company announcements, sales outreach, or long-form content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finish an existing Japanese business talking-head, lecture, interview, or testimonial rough cut as a credibility-first vertical social video. Use when the user wants an SNS short that preserves the speaker's meaning while tightening repeated ideas, adding a first-second thesis, readable full captions, restrained punch-ins, speaker identification, a registered CTA card, dialogue-first audio, and retention QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs subgroup and heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) analyses for clinical trials. Covers Mantel-Haenszel pooling, Breslow-Day, interaction tests in regression, RERI for additive interaction, modern data-adaptive HTE methods (STEPP, SIDES, causal forests, X/R-learners), Bayesian shrinkage (Dixon-Simon, MAP, EXNEX), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), and credibility frameworks (Sun BMJ, EMA 2019). Use when analyzing treatment effects across patient subgroups for regulatory submissions or precision-medicine claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs subgroup and heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) analyses for clinical trials. Covers Mantel-Haenszel pooling, Breslow-Day, interaction tests in regression, RERI for additive interaction, modern data-adaptive HTE methods (STEPP, SIDES, causal forests, X/R-learners), Bayesian shrinkage (Dixon-Simon, MAP, EXNEX), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), and credibility frameworks (Sun BMJ, EMA 2019). Use when analyzing treatment effects across patient subgroups for regulatory submissions or precision-medicine claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract actionable patterns, architecture decisions, code conventions, and skill-relevant insights from GitHub/GitLab repositories. Assess repo credibility, run the full security scan pipeline, and apply findings to existing skills, new skills, or the current project. Load when the user asks to learn from a repo, extract patterns from a codebase, study a repository, or analyze a repo for reusable techniques. Also triggers on "learn from this repo", "learn from this repository", "what can we learn from this codebase", "extract patterns from this repo", "study this repo".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate any project, product, or system's claims against its actual implementation — scoring each claim for truth, identifying architectural gaps, assessing competitive positioning, proposing creative solutions, and producing an actionable roadmap. Load when the user asks to evaluate claims, reality-check a project, assess what this project actually does vs what it says, validate product claims, or score a system's credibility. Also triggers on "is this real", "does this work as claimed", "evaluate this project", "assess the gap between claims and reality", "how credible is this", "investor assessment", "score these claims", or "what's real vs marketing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract actionable skill knowledge from academic papers and research articles, assess credibility, run security checks, and either improve existing skills or create new ones. Load when the user asks to learn from a paper, extract insights from a research paper, turn a paper into a skill, apply paper findings to skills, read this paper and improve my skills, or process a research article. Also triggers on "skill from paper", "learn from this paper", "paper to skill", "extract from this research", "apply this paper", or when the user uploads or links to an academic PDF or paper URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for the learn-from suite - auto-detects source type (academic paper, GitHub repo, blog/web article, or in-conversation learnings) and routes to the correct sub-skill for credibility check, security scan, insight extraction, and application. Load when the user says "learn from", "learn from this", "extract insights from", "apply learnings from", "what can we learn from", or provides a URL, file path, or pasted content that should be ingested as knowledge. Single entry point for all learning workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract actionable insights from blog posts, web articles, and practitioner content - assess credibility, run security checks, and either improve existing skills or apply to the current project. Load when the user asks to learn from an article, extract insights from a blog post, apply a practitioner's findings, or process engineering blog content. Also triggers on "learn from this article", "learn from this blog post", "extract insights from this post", "what can we learn from this article", "apply this article", or when the user links to a blog, Medium, Substack, dev.to, or engineering blog post.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply validated research paper insights to the current project codebase — improving architecture, code patterns, testing strategies, documentation, or workflows based on empirical findings. Load when learn-from-paper routes insights to the current project, or when the user asks to apply paper findings to this project, improve this codebase with research, use this paper to improve my project, or apply research to my code. Also triggers on "apply this to my project", "how can this paper help my codebase", "use these findings here", "implement paper recommendations", "use research to improve my code". Always called AFTER learn-from-paper has completed credibility and security checks — never ingests papers directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs subgroup and heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) analyses for clinical trials. Covers Mantel-Haenszel pooling, Breslow-Day, interaction tests in regression, RERI for additive interaction, modern data-adaptive HTE methods (STEPP, SIDES, causal forests, X/R-learners), Bayesian shrinkage (Dixon-Simon, MAP, EXNEX), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), and credibility frameworks (Sun BMJ, EMA 2019). Use when analyzing treatment effects across patient subgroups for regulatory submissions or precision-medicine claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes content for E-E-A-T signals and suggests improvements to build authority and trust. Identifies missing credibility elements. Use PROACTIVELY for YMYL topics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。