「hn」の検索結果

Operate a reusable technical book manuscript workspace with writing structure, reader persona SSOT, review rules, and optional Markdown to Re:VIEW/PDF support. Use when organizing a book manuscript repo, defining or reviewing target readers, standardizing chapter/section files, setting writing/review agents, handling publisher proof comments, or assessing an existing writing workspace. Triggers on book writing workspace, reader persona, reader audience, 読者ペルソナ, persona SSOT, technical book project, 執筆ワークスペース, manuscript workflow, Re:VIEW workspace, proof PDF, annotated proof, publisher proof comments, 校正, 校正注釈, and 初校.

Technical Specification Command. Translates a PRD into an implementation-ready technical spec through deep project analysis and clarification. Use when the user says "create a tech spec", "write the technical design", "spec this out", or after a PRD is complete and the user wants to move to technical planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Media Technical Director/Manager — calling a live broadcast switcher and owning the technical readiness sign-off, designing router/path redundancy and PTP failover for an IP production, resolving a timecode or loudness compliance defect found in rehearsal, or running the post-incident review after an on-air technical failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biofuels/Biodiesel Technology and Product Development Manager — deciding whether a lab/bench-scale process is ready to scale up, evaluating feedstock flexibility tradeoffs in process design, pricing a technology's value against regulatory credit pathways (RFS RIN, LCFS CI score), or managing IP strategy for a novel conversion process. Distinct from biofuels-production-manager, which runs an existing operating facility — this role owns R&D and commercialization of new or improved process technology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing admin-level cleanup in a Salesforce org: deleting unused fields, removing inactive Flow versions, deactivating legacy automation, running Salesforce Optimizer or Org Check, and performing destructive metadata deploys. Triggers: 'clean up unused fields', 'delete inactive flows', 'run Optimizer', 'org has too many custom fields', 'remove old workflow rules', 'Flow version limit'. NOT for assessing or reporting on technical debt (use architect/technical-debt-assessment). NOT for code-level refactoring or Apex cleanup (use apex/ skills).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare for Anthropic-specific technical interviews covering Constitutional AI, RLHF, interpretability, scaling laws, MCP, agentic systems, and AI safety. Activate on "anthropic interview", "constitutional AI prep", "alignment interview", "safety interview", "RLHF opinion", "interpretability prep", "anthropic technical". NOT for general ML interview prep, system design interviews, coding challenges, or behavioral interview practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct technical research on technologies and architecture. Use when the user says they would like to do or produce a technical research report

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Systems Engineering Handbook (NASA/SP-2016-6105 Rev 2). Use for NASA's systems-engineering process model — the SE Engine and 17 common technical processes, the program/project life cycle (Pre-Phase A through F), Key Decision Points and technical reviews (MCR/SRR/PDR/CDR/…), stakeholder expectations, technical requirements, design solution, product verification and validation, and crosscutting technical management (planning, risk, configuration, interfaces, data, assessment, decision analysis). Strong for aerospace/spaceflight project SE and lifecycle gating; NASA-specific terminology (KDPs, NPR 7123.1).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Technology Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to the exact passage, technology risks (architecture, build versus buy, vendor lock-in, security of design, engineering capacity), what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CTO review", "pressure-test the technical side of this plan", "what would a CTO ask about this" or "rehearse the technology seat before the review". Do not use for cash, payback or budget questions, use cfo-reviewer instead; for capacity and timeline questions, use coo-reviewer; for security controls, privacy or compliance, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive English conversation practice partner for Japanese learners. Use this skill whenever the user wants to practice speaking English, role-play a real-life situation (hotel check-in, restaurant, airport, business meeting, technical discussion, code review, job interview, daily small talk, etc.), discuss a technical article in English, or asks how to phrase something naturally in English. Trigger on requests like 'let's practice English', 'I want to talk in English', 'role play', 'pretend you are a ___', 'discuss this article in English', 'how do I say X in English'. 英会話練習・ロールプレイ・英語表現の質問のためのスキル。「英会話したい」「英語で話そう」「ロールプレイ」「ホテルのチェックイン練習」「この記事について英語で話したい」「xxって英語でどう言う？」などのリクエストで起動する。ユーザーは音声入力で会話する想定。会話前に想定問答・頻出表現・単語を提示し、会話を開始、最後に添削まで行う。

Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire, executing sales sequences, or coaching qualification. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full SEO audit: Google Search Console data + URL Inspection API + PageSpeed Insights API + technical crawl + keyword research + metadata audit + schema markup audit + search intent analysis + Core Web Vitals monitoring. Feeds real GSC data and PageSpeed metrics into AI to surface quick wins, diagnose traffic drops, find content gaps, identify metadata mismatches, detect schema gaps, monitor page performance, and produce an actionable 30-day plan. Use this skill whenever the user asks about SEO, search rankings, organic traffic, Google Search Console, keyword performance, traffic drops, content gaps, search visibility, technical SEO, meta tags, schema markup, structured data, URL indexing, keyword research, indexing issues, page speed, performance, Core Web Vitals, LCP, INP, CLS, or Lighthouse scores. Also trigger on: "why is my traffic down", "what keywords am I ranking for", "improve my rankings", "check my search console", "SEO audit", "analyze my SEO", "technical SEO", "meta tags", "indexing issues", "crawl errors", "content strategy", "keyword cannibalization", "search intent", "schema markup", "structured data", "URL inspection", "page speed", "performance score", "core web vitals", "lighthouse", or any organic search question. If in doubt, trigger. This skill handles everything from quick GSC checks to deep technical audits with performance monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical SEO audit across 8 categories: crawlability, indexability, security, URL structure, mobile, Core Web Vitals, structured data, JS rendering. Schema deep validation → seo-schema. AI crawlers → seo-geo-technical. Use when user says "technical SEO", "crawl issues", "robots.txt", "Core Web Vitals".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare for Anthropic-specific technical interviews covering Constitutional AI, RLHF, interpretability, scaling laws, MCP, agentic systems, and AI safety. Activate on "anthropic interview", "constitutional AI prep", "alignment interview", "safety interview", "RLHF opinion", "interpretability prep", "anthropic technical". NOT for general ML interview prep, system design interviews, coding challenges, or behavioral interview practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DiscordのローカルアーカイブからメッセージやDMを検索し、期間を絞った確認や要約に役立てるスキル。保存データの鮮度と取得範囲も確認します。

• Discordの過去の議論を探したいとき
• チャンネルの一週間を振り返りたいとき
• 保存済みの直近DMを確認したいとき

GitHubのローカル保存データからIssueやPR、重複候補を調べ、同期状況や情報の不足を確認しながら、判断前に最新の状態を照合するスキル。

• 不具合に関連するIssueやPRを探したいとき
• 重複候補のIssueを確認したいとき
• 対応判断前に保存情報の鮮度を確かめたいとき

コードレビューの指摘を実際のコードや対応環境と照らし合わせ、妥当性を確認します。不明点の整理、根拠を示した返答、修正ごとのテストまで進めるスキルです。

• 曖昧なレビュー指摘を整理したいとき
• 提案された変更の互換性確認
• 追加機能が使われているか調べたいとき

直前の説明が分かりにくかったときに、背景を補って説明し直します。簡略化された技術英語の規格とプロジェクトの用語集に沿い、話の流れを伝え直すスキルです。

• 直前の説明を分かりやすく聞き直したいとき
• 話の流れを理解するための背景説明
• プロジェクトの共通用語での説明

学術・技術文献を検索し、選定基準に沿って比較・統合するスキルです。検索履歴や除外理由を残し、根拠の強さと引用を確認したレビューにまとめます。

• 研究テーマの全体像を把握したいとき
• 検索手順を記録した文献レビュー
• 研究結果の矛盾や未解決課題の整理

市場規模の推計、競合比較、投資家や技術の調査を、出典付きでまとめるスキル。事実と推測を分け、反証やリスクも含めて事業判断につながる提案を整理します。

• 市場参入前に規模を推計したいとき
• 競合の特徴や立ち位置の比較
• 相談前の投資家調査

技術の仕組みやグラフ、システム構成、製品の流れをManimのアニメーションで説明し、絵コンテとシーン計画、短い動画、サムネイルを作るスキル。

• 技術の仕組みを動画で説明したいとき
• グラフやネットワークの変化を可視化
• 業務フローやシステム構成の説明

Thorough, file-cited technical debt audit across 9 dimensions using AST-grep (tree-sitter), grep, LSP, and language-native tooling. Produces TECH_DEBT_AUDIT.md with severity, effort estimates, and prioritized fixes. Use when asked for codebase health check, tech debt audit, architecture review, code quality assessment, or cleanup planning. Triggers: 'tech debt', 'technical debt', 'debt audit', 'code health', 'technical debt audit', 'codebase health check', 'find tech debt', 'debt analysis', 'audit code quality'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand anti-reversing, obfuscation, and protection techniques encountered during software analysis. Use this skill when analyzing malware evasion techniques, when implementing anti-debugging protections for CTF challenges, when reverse engineering packed binaries, or when building security research tools that need to detect virtualized environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map advanced persistent threat (APT) group TTPs to the MITRE ATT&CK framework using the attackcti Python library to query STIX/TAXII data for group-technique associations, then generate ATT&CK Navigator layer files to visualize and compare defensive coverage against adversary profiles. Use when profiling an APT group's techniques, building Navigator coverage heatmaps, or assessing technique coverage gaps against a specific threat actor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。