「how-to」の検索結果

Memory is the cornerstone of intelligent agents. Without it, every interaction starts from zero. This skill covers the architecture of agent memory: short-term (context window), long-term (vector stores), and the cognitive architectures that organize them. Key insight: Memory isn't just storage - it's retrieval. A million stored facts mean nothing if you can't find the right one. Chunking, embedding, and retrieval strategies determine whether your agent remembers or forgets. The field is fragmented with inconsistent terminology. We use the CoALA cognitive architecture framework: semantic memory (facts), episodic memory (experiences), and procedural memory (how-to knowledge). Use when "agent memory, long-term memory, memory systems, remember across sessions, memory retrieval, episodic memory, semantic memory, vector store, rag, langmem, memgpt, conversation history, memory, vector-store, rag, retrieval, embedding, episodic, semantic, procedural, langmem, memgpt, pinecone, qdrant, chromadb" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a git repo before new work: review uncommitted changes, fix .gitignore, delete merged branches, end on clean main, or inspect one branch before deciding. Don't use for dead code, commit-and-push, releases, LICENSE files, or git how-tos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs Amazon A+ Content (formerly Enhanced Brand Content) — the 8 module suite that appears below the standard product carousel for Brand Registered sellers. Covers Hero Banner (21:9 / 2388×1024), Pain Points / Selling Points / Technology / Data / How-to-Use / Variants (3:2 / 1536×1024), and Endorsement (21:9), with mobile safe-area rule, 30pt text floor, and cross-module consistency anchored to the main image URL. Use when the user says "A+ page", "A+ content", "Amazon A+", "Brand Content", "Enhanced Brand Content", "亚马逊详情页", "A+ 详情页", "21:9 banner", "Hero Banner", "Amazon detail page module", or any request for the brand-registered detail-page module suite. For the 1:1 main image and carousel secondary images, see the `product-shots-main-image` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify, write, and audit documentation per Diátaxis (diataxis.fr) — the four-quadrant method (tutorials · how-to guides · reference · explanation). Encodes the compass as a decision procedure, each quadrant's contract as hard rules, and an executable mixed-mode audit. Project-agnostic; the per-repo doc-location mapping lives in a repo rule of the project's own (kolu: `.apm/instructions/diataxis.instructions.md`). Use when writing any user-facing doc, structuring a docs site, or auditing existing docs for mixed modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a "how do I …" question about the platform with a Gherkin scenario on @datagrok-libraries/bdd that is filmed into a how-to video (grok-bdd guide), so the answer is demonstrated, sent as a video plus numbered steps, and kept as a regression test

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, restructure, classify, and review documentation with the Diataxis framework. Use when the user asks to create, improve, audit, or reorganize documentation of any kind: knowledge bases, help centers, onboarding guides, process docs, manuals, runbooks, product or API docs, tutorials, how-to guides, references, explanations. Also use when the user mentions Diataxis, docs taxonomy, or documentation architecture, or asks why a document feels confusing. Also use for Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100) or controlled-language rewrites of English technical docs. Not for marketing, legal, sales, press, or fiction writing unless the user wants a Diataxis-style analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides the "how-to" for workflow / task execution orchestration. Defines methods for planning multi-phase task/workflows, implementing them through agent delegation, and managing artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write SEO-optimized long-form articles targeting specific keywords using the They Ask You Answer Big 5 framework (Marcus Sheridan). Articles are categorized by Big 5 type (Cost, Problems, Versus, Best/Reviews, How-To) and structured accordingly. The "answer first" rule applies to every article. Use when the user asks for an SEO article, blog post for ranking, "rank for keyword X", organic content, search-optimized post, pillar page, or content for organic traffic. Includes keyword targeting, search intent matching, internal linking suggestions, and meta tags. For improving an existing article, see copy-review. For deciding what to write about, see social-calendar pillars and icp-research. For repurposing it, see content-repurposer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, rewrite, review, and organize developer-facing documentation for web software projects. Use when creating or improving README files, docs homepages, quickstarts, tutorials, how-to guides, API/reference pages, conceptual explanations, migration guides, or troubleshooting content for frontend, backend, full-stack, SDK, API, or framework-based web products. This skill applies strong information architecture, task-first page structure, clear voice, runnable examples, version and prerequisite hygiene, accessibility rules, and docs-as-code maintenance habits. Do not use it for marketing copy, legal text, or non-technical customer-support articles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when stuck on a hard problem, decomposition is unclear, a related problem is needed, or explicit looking-back review will improve transfer. NOT for routine execution with a known procedure, rote checklist work, or domain questions that need specialized subject matter expertise instead of heuristic search.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7150.2D — NASA Software Engineering Requirements. Use for NASA's Agency-wide software-engineering requirements: the software classification scheme (Classes A–F), the Requirements Mapping Matrix and class-driven applicability, tailoring and Technical Authority governance, the SWE-### 'shall' requirements across software management (Ch 3) and the engineering life cycle (Ch 4), the supporting disciplines (configuration management, risk, peer reviews/inspections, measurement, non-conformance — Ch 5), safety-critical and cybersecurity requirements, IV&V applicability, traceability, and the Appendix A definitions. Does not cover detailed software-assurance/safety procedures (see NASA-STD-8739.8), implementation how-to and document content (see NASA-HDBK-2203), the systems-engineering process framework (see NPR 7123.1), or program/project management (see NPR 7120.5).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)). Use for the Department of Defense's five digital engineering goals — (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; (5) transform the culture and workforce — plus their focus areas, the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts, model formalisms/provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout. A vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive. Does NOT provide a how-to method, tool tutorials, MBSE/SysML mechanics, or implementation-plan content; thin on metrics, acquisition-policy detail, and step-by-step procedure. Excludes the CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a list of merged changes, closed work items or commit messages the user provides into DRAFT release notes under the version heading and date the user supplies, grouped as features, fixes and other, in the organisation's tone from the style guide or prior notes given, with every entry traced to its source item, breaking changes and required actions flagged first, and internal-only items held back for the release owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write the release notes for this version", "turn these merged pull requests into a changelog", "summarise what shipped this sprint for customers", "draft the what's new for this release" or "group these closed tickets into release notes". Do not use for an announcement email or intranet post about a launch, use announcement-drafter instead; for a change ticket, use change-request-pack; for a how-to article about one fix, use knowledge-article-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts one service catalogue entry (description, scope in and out, owners and support groups, service levels exactly as provided, request path, dependencies, charging, lifecycle) from the service team's notes, questionnaire answers or existing documents, with UNKNOWN and a question list for every field the inputs do not cover. Never invents a service level, owner or price. Use when the user asks to "write the catalogue entry for this service", "turn these questionnaire answers into a service description", "tidy this request catalogue item" or "check this draft entry for empty fields". Do not use for a how-to or known-error article, use knowledge-article-drafter instead; for operating procedures, use runbook-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts one knowledge article or known-error article from a resolved incident or ticket thread: symptoms as reported, environment, cause exactly as the resolver stated it, resolution steps as performed, workaround with its limits, verification, things tried without effect, related records, keywords and proposed metadata, every statement traced to a ticket note or marked UNKNOWN, with a redaction log and a question list for the knowledge owner. Never decides a root cause, adds a step or publishes. Use when the user asks to "write a KB article from this ticket", "turn this resolved incident into a knowledge article", "draft a known error record for this", "document the fix we just did" or "make this thread into a how-to for the service desk". Do not use for a procedure the team will execute (runbook, operating procedure, playbook), use runbook-drafter instead; for a post-incident review, use incident-postmortem-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an evergreen teaching longform for non-technical readers built from your own real material (systems you run, dated failures, numbers), structured as a stitched lesson that can live as a blog post, a GitHub guide hub and a newsletter issue. Use when turning lived engineering experience into a durable how-to. Triggers: /guide, make a guide, build a lesson, evergreen guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces WordPress draft posts from research findings — converts Paper Store research records or raw research data into publishable blog posts, buying guides, brand spotlights, and how-to articles. Use when the task asks to "turn research into a post", "create a blog post from findings", "publish my research", "research to content", or "write up the findings". Covers the full research-to-post pipeline with Paper Store integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps an AI assistant work with the Miraheze wiki farm — writing wiki requests that get approved, navigating ManageWiki, doing common how-to tasks (templates, skins, permissions, custom domains, backups), writing regex for MediaWiki search-and-replace, AND writing actual article and page content for Miraheze-hosted wikis. Miraheze does NOT ban generative AI; AI-written content is permitted (subject to per-wiki rules). MADE BY SQERSTERS

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

docs (editable docs people share and comment on; the default for any document, named as a doc or not: a document, report, proposal, resume, cover letter, letter, contract, policy, form, template, worksheet, essay, handbook, guide, how-to, cheat sheet, SOP or other writing to keep, share, collaborate on, send, submit, print or sign; a doc exports to Word, PDF, Markdown or Google Docs, so needing a file to send, attach, upload, submit or print is no reason to pick Word, and a file nobody asked for is a doc, not Word; a plan, comparison, summary or notes asked in chat stays in chat; a pasted claude.ai artifact link may be a doc: check with docs tools first; Word or another file format named, tracked changes wanted, or a .docx to change or use as a template → that format's skill): making one → if no docs-connector instructions are in context, call its `guide` (topic.instructions) first; then create the doc (headings only, no body) before any search, file read or plan, even with files attached.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture conversations and decisions into structured Notion pages; use when turning chats/notes into wiki entries, how-tos, decisions, or FAQs with proper linking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a read-only Coval evaluation, simulation, monitoring, product-how-to, or troubleshooting subtask to Sofia through the official Coval MCP consult_sofia tool. Use when the user needs Coval-specific FDE judgment, analysis of organization data, metric or test-set recommendations, or a diagnosis grounded in Coval runs and conversations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。