「criteria」の検索結果

Knowledge base from DAFMAN 63-119 (15 April 2021), Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification. Use for continuous MOTRC replacing single-point OTRR thinking: framework/applicability, Certification Official vs PM roles, review cycle and exit criteria, certification memo/decertify gates, DT&E/contractor evidence, ITT integration and cyber resiliency, and the 31-template matrix. DAF T&E readiness process only—does not replace DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, or multi-service lead policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from IS-GPS-200 Rev N (NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment / Navigation User Segment Interfaces). Use as a worked ICD/IS exemplar: what an interface specification is, DIST-A and IRN/CCB change control, interface definition vs identification, composite-signal criteria patterns, NAV data as payload families, and time/definition hygiene. Covers Rev N synthesized notes only; does not transcribe Apps II–IV bit fields or PRN/Gold-code tables, and does not replace faa-std-025 preparation rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a DRAFT internal audit pack from the audit plan: scope as stated, criteria with clauses quoted from the documents provided, document requests per auditee with due dates, open interview questions per process and role, previous findings to follow up and a readiness checklist. Never pre-judges conformity, writes findings or selects the sample; the lead auditor decides. Use when the user asks to "prepare the internal audit", "build the audit pack from this plan", "draft the document requests and interview questions" or "get us ready for the supplier audit". Do not use for evidence requests built from a control list, use control-evidence-request-pack instead; to chase actions from earlier audits, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads two or more supplier, bid or tender responses against a requirements list and returns a DRAFT comparison pack: a requirement-by-supplier matrix, gaps per supplier, clarification questions and neutral observations, for an evaluation panel. Never scores, weights, ranks or recommends a winner; the award stays with the panel. Use when the user asks to "compare these bids", "matrix the tender responses against our requirements", "collate the RFQ replies", "show me where each supplier falls short" or "draft clarification questions for the bidders". Do not use for scoring or weighting against agreed criteria, use supplier-evaluation-matrix instead, or for writing the requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs a pre-launch evaluation plan for a declarative agent from its instructions text, skills, capabilities, knowledge sources and sample requests: a behaviour contract of testable statements quoted from the text, test prompts by scenario family and tier with setup, expected behaviour, pass and fail criteria and red flags, a red-flag catalogue, a blank scoring sheet, a coverage table and a go or no-go checklist the owner completes and decides. Use when the user asks to "write test cases for my agent", "how do I evaluate this agent before launch", "build a test plan for the agent", "what should I check before publishing this agent" or "give me a go no-go checklist". Do not use for finding injection or leakage exposures in the instructions, use agent-instructions-red-team instead; do not use for reviewing one SKILL.md, use skill-file-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build qualified prospect lists using an explicit ICP, source provenance, qualification criteria, scoring, enrichment hygiene and outreach-compliance checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run my launch day", "build a launch day runbook / war room", or "decide CONTINUE or ROLLBACK after the push"; produces a pre-conditions gate check (launch-readiness-auditor SHIP verdict + the authoritative date in launch-registry — missing either stops the skill), a dated hour-blocked runbook with owners (morning irreversible pushes, daytime monitoring loop, evening consolidation), a forced observation-window verdict after every irreversible action against pre-declared kill criteria, a P0-P3 incident ladder with rollback playbooks, and T-0 status lines for the registry proposal protocol. Not for channel submission content and platform rules — use community-launch-runner; not for media replies — use press-media-relations. 发布日runbook/作战室/观察窗/回滚裁决/发布日指挥

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "plan the participation ramp before we promote", "how much account history or karma do we need in this community", or "design entry incentives and member lifecycle for our own Discord"; produces the per-community pre-promotion warming plan — account-history/tenure expectations (Estimated, named sources), a give-before-ask ledger spec, a per-community etiquette + rule digest with last-verified dates, and the warming → active graduation criteria that channel-registry requires as state-transition evidence — plus the owned-community variant (entry paths + member lifecycle for your own Discord/Slack/forum/企业微信私域). Not for launch-day submissions or T-0 threads — use community-launch-runner. 社区预热/先给后取/账号养成/毕业标准

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "test our messaging before we scale it", "design a message-market-fit panel", or "run a 5-second comprehension test on our new tagline"; produces a message-test design spec — hypothesis, panel and recruit criteria, comprehension / 5-second / message-market-fit (Wynter-style) protocols, stimulus set drawn from the canon, success thresholds, and a stop/revise decision rule — for the TALE Evaluate phase so the message is validated before any paid scale. It designs the test; it never runs the experiment or adjudicates a claim. Not for running the panel or A/B experiment — use send-experiment-designer or ad-test-designer; not for analyzing the results — use performance-analyzer; not for authoring the message itself — use message-system-architect. 消息测试/理解度测试/面板设计/五秒测试/消息市场契合

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "analyze my target audience", "build an audience profile for influencer targeting", "research a niche community", or "deep-dive a subculture before partnering with creators"; in audience mode produces demographic/psychographic profiles, a platform-priority matrix, named personas, and an influencer-selection criteria set, and in niche mode produces a community map, culture decode (language/norms/taboos), key-voice tiers, a Brand Fit Score, and a phased entry strategy. Not for finding specific creators to contract — use influencer-discovery; not for scoring a shortlist on Suitability — use fit-scorer. 目标受众画像/人群分析 · 细分社群/亚文化调研

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire, executing sales sequences, or coaching qualification. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether AI-assisted work defines review criteria, accessible context, explicit review loop, human judgment boundary, and feedback capture before delegating to an agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive slices from specs, order by dependencies, write acceptance criteria with citations, and finalize phase/progress artifacts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a 5-part mini spec (goal, constraints, acceptance criteria, verification, done gate) before starting any multi-step, externally-delivered, or risky task. Triggers when: a request has 3+ steps, touches external delivery, or is easy to declare done too early. NOT for: single lookups, one-line edits, routine acks, or simple factual answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Algolia — algolia index management, search relevance tuning, analytics review, and configuration optimization. Covers index settings, ranking criteria, faceting configuration, synonyms, rules, API key management, and usage quotas. Read this skill before any Algolia operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, execute, and document validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP <1220>/<1225>/<1226>, ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays whenever the question is whether a procedure is fit for its intended purpose. Triggers include "method validation", "analytical method validation", "AMV", "validation protocol", "acceptance criteria", "linearity", "reportable range", "accuracy and precision", "repeatability", "intermediate precision", "recovery", "LOD", "LOQ", "detection limit", "quantitation limit", "specificity", "robustness", "method transfer", "method comparison", "Deming", "Passing-Bablok", "Bland-Altman", "equivalence testing", "OOS investigation", "ICH Q2", "Q2(R2)", "Q14", "USP 1225", "ICH M10", "incurred sample reanalysis", "ISR", "CLSI EP", and any request to show that an assay works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve AI application with evaluation-driven development. Define eval criteria, instrument the application, build golden datasets, observe and evaluate application runs, analyze results, and produce a concrete action plan for improvements. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user asks to set up QA, add tests, add evals, evaluate, benchmark, fix wrong behaviors, improve quality, or do quality assurance for any Python project that calls an LLM model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive 9-step prompt crafting and delegation protocol for autonomous multi-agent teams. Enforces objective verification, integrity modes, and acceptance criteria across Antigravity, Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode, Codex, and Roo Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a job description, hiring post, or recruitment page for role requirements, evaluation criteria, keywords, risks, and resume or cover letter angles. Use when the user provides a JD URL/text, asks what a company is looking for, wants JD-resume gap analysis, or needs inputs for a tailored cover letter. 한국어 요청도 포함합니다 - 채용공고 분석, 공고 분석, JD 분석, 직무기술서 분석, 자격요건, 우대사항, 이 공고 뭘 원하는지, 공고랑 내 경력 비교.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guardrails for implementation work. Reduces common LLM coding mistakes: overcomplication, silent assumption-picking, scope drift, and unverifiable success criteria. Load on Builder and software-engineer-mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria. Use when implementing features, refactoring, or any multi-step work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automates SOC 2 Type II audit preparation including gap assessment against AICPA Trust Services Criteria (CC1-CC9), evidence collection from cloud providers and identity systems, control testing validation, remediation tracking, and continuous compliance monitoring. Covers all five TSC categories (Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy) with automated evidence gathering from AWS, Azure, GCP, Okta, GitHub, and Jira. Use when preparing for or maintaining SOC 2 Ty...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Durable repo-native multi-goal plans with embedded success criteria and evidence audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Busabase-backed sandbox desk for scoring and triaging course-instructor ("讲师") candidates found on a recruiting-style platform. Use whenever the user invokes $kelly-instructor-sourcing or /kelly-instructor-sourcing, wants a lightweight instructor candidate tracker, needs to score sourcing-platform leads against a three-axis rubric (background endorsement, expertise depth/breadth, teaching-service ability) before reaching out, or wants to log a WeChat add without building a live-connected outreach tool. Three subcommands - setup, criteria, review - plus the desk itself. v1 is sandbox-only — every dataset is deterministic mock data, it never connects to a real sourcing-platform or messaging account, and it never sends a message or automates a WeChat add - that stays entirely human-performed outside the app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。