「detect」の検索結果

Market regime identification using volatility clustering, trend detection, and statistical methods for adaptive trading

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated hypothesis generation and testing using large language models. Use this skill when generating scientific hypotheses from datasets, combining literature insights with empirical data, testing hypotheses against observational data, or conducting systematic hypothesis exploration for research discovery in domains like deception detection, AI content detection, mental health analysis, or other empirical research tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process and generate multimedia content using Google Gemini API. Capabilities include analyze audio files (transcription with timestamps, summarization, speech understanding, music/sound analysis up to 9.5 hours), understand images (captioning, object detection, OCR, visual Q&A, segmentation), process videos (scene detection, Q&A, temporal analysis, YouTube URLs, up to 6 hours), extract from documents (PDF tables, forms, charts, diagrams, multi-page), generate images (text-to-image, editing, composition, refinement). Use when working with audio/video files, analyzing images or screenshots, processing PDF documents, extracting structured data from media, creating images from text prompts, or implementing multimodal AI features. Supports multiple models (Gemini 2.5/2.0) with context windows up to 2M tokens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reverse-engineering or detecting malware — static triage + capa/YARA-X, emulation/DBI/.NET unpacking, dynamic/fileless/Volatility 3 memory analysis, C2 config extraction (Cobalt Strike/CAPE), C2 traffic detection (JA4+, beaconing)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computer vision for bio-image preprocessing, feature detection, real-time microscopy. Color conversion, morphology, contour/blob detection, template matching, optical flow on fluorescence/brightfield. 10-100× faster than pure Python via C++. Use scikit-image for scientific morphometry/regionprops; OpenCV for real-time, video, classical feature extraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove the discourse-level (structural) signs of AI writing that survive surface editing: stated lessons and moral-of-the-story closers, tidy single-track arcs, embodied-emotion performance ("chest tightened"), vague allusions instead of named references, unbroken linear structure, and shape convergence across pieces. Grounded in the StoryScope study (Russell et al. 2026): narrative structure alone detects AI text at 93.2% F1, and professional stylistic rewriting moved detection only 1.6 points. Use as the SECOND pass after the humanizer skill (which handles words and phrasing) whenever writing or revising LinkedIn posts, course lessons, blog posts, essays, newsletters, or emails that must read as human. Triggers: "humanize", "de-slop", "AI tells", "make this sound human", "structural pass", "deep humanize".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and map data silos in construction organizations. Identify disconnected data sources and integration opportunities

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered construction defect detection using computer vision. Identify cracks, spalling, corrosion, and other defects in concrete, steel, and building components from images and video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and analyze geometric clashes in BIM models. Identify MEP, structural, and architectural conflicts before construction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects workflow failures and inefficient patterns then files GitHub issues. Use when a workflow step repeatedly fails or produces inconsistent output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects architectural clusters and coupling boundaries via community detection on the code graph. Use when identifying module groupings or refactoring targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects codebase bloat via dead code, duplication, complexity, and doc bloat scans. Use when codebase feels large or before a release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect friction signals; graduate patterns into rules. Use for session retrospectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes face-alignment installation, import checks, landmark-detection workflows, and detector-backend selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use face_recognition to detect faces, extract landmarks and encodings, compare identities, run the face_recognition and face_detection CLIs, and troubleshoot dlib/model installation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SaaS vendor data processing inventory management. Covers shadow IT discovery, API-based data flow detection, processing purpose mapping, contract status tracking, and continuous inventory reconciliation for cloud service providers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementation guide for Global Privacy Control (GPC) automated opt-out signal per CPRA Section 1798.135(e). Covers Sec-GPC HTTP header detection, JavaScript navigator.globalPrivacyControl API, and state-specific requirements for CA, CO, CT, MT, TX, and OR. Includes server-side detection code and compliance mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates and maintains project documentation for features, systems, and components. Use when documenting how a feature, system, or component works — including writing, updating, or organizing docs. Does not scan or detect the project's technology stack — use project-discovery for repository analysis and config detection. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record for ADRs. Does not create or update coding standards — use coding-standard instead. Does not generate PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that. Does not produce runbooks for operational scenarios — use runbook for that. Does not rewrite existing prose for readability — use edit-for-readability for that. Does not produce an ephemeral, understand-now overview of code or a PR — use code-overview for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically repair C/C++ code violations detected by TLA+ model checking. Takes a program, TLA+ specification, and TLC counterexample trace as input, then generates minimal code modifications to eliminate the violation. Use when: (1) TLC model checker reports an invariant violation, deadlock, or temporal property failure, (2) You have a counterexample trace and need to fix the corresponding code, (3) You need to understand how a TLA+ violation maps to program-level bugs, (4) You want to validate repairs by re-running TLC. Supports safety properties (invariants), liveness properties (temporal logic), and deadlock detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze failing tests to detect functional bugs in code. Takes repository and failing test output as input, analyzes execution behavior, assertions, and stack traces to identify suspicious code regions and root causes. Use when debugging test failures, investigating regression bugs, or understanding why tests fail. Explains the bug mechanism, identifies affected code, and suggests fixes based on test expectations vs actual behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statically analyze code to detect security vulnerabilities including buffer overflows, injection risks (SQL, command, XSS), insecure deserialization, improper authentication, hard-coded credentials, and unsafe cryptography. Use when: (1) Performing security code review, (2) Analyzing code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, (3) Identifying CWE-classified weaknesses, (4) Generating security audit reports, (5) Reviewing code before deployment, or (6) Assessing third-party code security. Findings categorized by CWE ID and severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instruments code to track the flow of untrusted or sensitive data at runtime, enabling detection of injection vulnerabilities, data leaks, and privilege violations. Use when users need to: (1) Track untrusted input propagation through code, (2) Detect SQL injection, XSS, or command injection vulnerabilities, (3) Identify sensitive data leaks, (4) Monitor privilege escalation paths, (5) Perform dynamic taint analysis for security testing. Supports Python, Java, JavaScript, and C/C++ with configurable taint sources and sinks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether a new version of a repository preserves the behavior observed by tests on the old version. Use this skill when comparing two versions of code to detect regressions, verify refactoring safety, validate bug fixes don't break existing functionality, or ensure backward compatibility. Detects differences in function outputs, exceptions, observable states, and performance between versions. Generates reports highlighting potential regressions (critical, high, medium, low severity), improvements, and areas requiring verification. Triggers when users ask to check for regressions between versions, compare test behavior across versions, verify behavior preservation, or validate that changes don't break existing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically analyzes configuration files to detect inconsistencies, conflicts, missing keys, and divergent values across environments, versions, or modules. Use when managing multi-environment configurations, detecting config drift, validating configuration changes, or ensuring consistency across microservices. Supports JSON, YAML, TOML, INI, XML, .env, and properties files. Identifies security issues like hardcoded secrets and provides actionable resolution guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。