3,502 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Audit packages for documentation completeness, detect drift between code and docs, and maintain documentation quality across the monorepo. Use when checking package docs, running audits, or reviewing documentation health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a proven POC into a real, crouton-native, documented package(s) + a consuming app — the deliberate "step back and rebuild" checkpoint. SPEC-DRIVEN — the POC discovers a behaviour spec (captured at each sign-off), graduation freezes it as authoritative, the app is rebuilt the crouton way to satisfy it, and nothing is done until it's checked + signed off against two gates (experience + crouton-conformance). Use when a `pocs/*` app is proven and "done", or asked to "graduate this poc", "make it a real app", "extract the package".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The migration step and the package-owned-table exception — NOT the normal collection flow. For app collections use the crouton CLI/skill (schema JSON → `crouton config`); reach here when you then need to generate/apply the Drizzle migration and hit the schema.mjs-only-after-build gotcha ("No schema files found"), or when adding a package-owned infra table (the crouton-flow pattern) that does NOT go through `crouton config`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The router for how a change legally happens in this repo — which sign-off gate fires for which kind of change, what counts as approval, how the packages-edit guard works, and how work is allowed to reach main. Use when starting ANY change and unsure which rules apply, when an Edit to packages/* gets BLOCKED, when a pipeline issue sits on status:blocked and you need to know what unblocks it, or when asked "do I need sign-off for this", "how do I get this merged", "can I deploy this", "who approves X", "why won't my approval label/reaction do anything".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The crouton mental model for someone who has never seen this repo — what "layer" means (two different things), the two-halves rule, the three app.config registries, team-scoped multi-tenancy, manifest-driven field types, the numbered invariants with the incidents behind them, and the known-weak points. Use when orienting in this codebase for the first time, when a question is shaped like "how does crouton work / why is it built this way / where does X live", when deciding whether a change belongs in a package or a generated layer, when confused by an extends chain or by croutonApps/croutonCollections/croutonLayoutBlocks, or before proposing any structural change. Trigger phrases: "what is a crouton layer", "package vs generated layer", "how does multi-tenancy work here", "why is there a stub component", "where do field types come from", "what invariants must hold".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The case-law chronicle of this repo's major failures — symptom, root cause, evidence, status, and the rule each battle minted — so nobody re-fights a settled battle or re-proposes a rejected fix. Use when a bug/incident looks familiar ("didn't this happen before?"), when you're about to propose an approach that may have been tried and rejected (e.g. shipping a migration from a package), when someone asks "why does rule X exist" / "why is done-by-lgtm a thing" / "what was incident 988", or when a bug-archaeology run hits the shallow-clone wall and needs the pre-June-2026 history. Trigger phrases: "has this broken before", "why can't packages ship migrations", "why did graduation fail", "why is the green-build lesson a rule", "what did we learn from incident NN". (For a live "build is green but the app is broken" symptom, start at crouton-diagnostics-index. NB keep this description free of any space-then-hash sequence — an unquoted YAML scalar treats space-hash as a comment start and silently truncates.)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
大きな自然文構想を feature・architecture・機能間依存へマクロ分解したいとき、ready feature の system-dev-planner package を atomic 登録・binding 別投影したいときに使う。
確定 system spec と feature package から実装要件を導出したいとき、readiness 完了時だけ capability-build/task-graph build へ handoff したいときに使う。
dev-graph artifact を正規 path へ atomic 追加・差分更新したいとき、system-dev-planner の exact 13 phase task package を all-or-none 登録したいときに使う。
Expert guidance for building modern Android UIs with Jetpack Compose, covering state management, navigation, performance, and Material Design 3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage npm packages for install-script malware, exfiltration, and worming behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Captures and analyzes network packet data using Wireshark and tshark to identify malicious traffic patterns, diagnose protocol issues, extract artifacts, and support incident response investigations on authorized network segments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, organize, and manage Helm charts for templating and packaging Kubernetes applications with reusable configurations. Use when creating Helm charts, packaging Kubernetes applications, or implementing templated deployments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work through which package to add for a capability, and what each option costs — maintenance, licence, bundle weight, transitive risk, and whether the platform already does it. Use when someone needs a library for a job and has not picked one yet, when weighing two candidates, or when a package looks convenient but unmaintained.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Package license analysis — detect copyleft conflicts against a permissive policy, surface AGPL / SSPL / GPL contaminants, output SPDX SBOM with per-package license findings. Use when auditing a release for license compliance, vetting a new dependency's license, building an OSS-attribution document, or producing a customer-facing license disclosure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a language-agnostic ghost package (spec + portable tests) from an existing repo by extracting SPEC.md, exhaustive tests.yaml (operations and/or scenarios), INSTALL.md, README.md, VERIFY.md, and upstream LICENSE files with provenance and regeneration instructions. Use when prompts say "/tw-ghost", "ghostify this repo", "spec-ify/spec-package this library", "ghost library", or ask to extract portable spec/tests for libraries or tool-using agent loops (scenario testing); do not use for implementation work or editing skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
METAINFORMANT rules for directory scripts/package. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and improve stable names, aliases, vocabulary, field casing, routes, ports, packages, and agent-search discoverability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TanStack Router bundler plugin for route generation and automatic code splitting. Supports Vite, Webpack, Rspack, and esbuild. Configures autoCodeSplitting, routesDirectory, target framework, and code split groupings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base synthesized from the Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK) v2.14 by the BKCASE Project. Use for the established systems-engineering canon: SE fundamentals and foundations (systems science, systems thinking, the systems approach, modelling/MBSE), the life cycle (ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288/24748/24774 process, development & agile approaches, model selection/tailoring), technical management, concept definition, architecture/realization (the Vee), V&V, maintenance/sustainment, SE standards, and the application contexts (product, service, enterprise, systems-of-systems, healthcare), plus enabling SE (business/team/individual), related disciplines, quality attributes/specialty engineering, implementation examples, and emerging knowledge. Good for grounding background, vocabulary, and prior-art positions across all eight SEBoK Parts. SCOPE LIMITS: this pack is SEBoK v2.14 only (released 2026-05-18); it synthesizes and signposts rather than reproducing the source — it does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE standard text, is a curated guide (not a complete textbook), and is thin on AI-integration depth (Part 8 is a staging area, not settled practice). LICENCE: content is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 — non-commercial use only, attribution to the BKCASE Project required, share-alike obligations carry forward.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the NASA Cost Estimating Handbook (CEH) v4.0. Use for NASA's 12-step, three-part cost estimating process (Project Definition, Cost Methodology, Cost Estimate); the WBS, CADRe, and ONCE data backbone; estimating methodologies (analogy, parametric/CER, engineering build-up, EVM, Delphi); ground rules and assumptions, data normalization and inflation (BY/CY/RY); the point-estimate-to-S-curve cost-risk chain and Unallocated Future Expense (UFE) reserves; Joint Cost and Schedule Confidence Level (JCL) analysis via probabilistic cost-loaded schedules; decision-support analyses (sensitivity, trade studies, make/lease-vs-buy, affordability, CAIV); and economic analysis (discounting, NPV, OMB Circular A-94). The cost-estimating complement to NASA's SE and risk packs. Does NOT reproduce the handbook's tool-specific procedures, worked examples, or appendix-depth methods (it names the appendices), nor cover full DoD/GAO cost guides, schedule construction, or formal risk management beyond the cost interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the DoD Test & Evaluation Enterprise Guidebook (August 2022 edition 8.02) with DOT&E-facing enterprise emphasis. Use for T&E enterprise roles (DOT&E vs USD(R&E)), DT&E/OT&E/LFT&E, cybersecurity T&E, MOSA/automation/digital enablers, suitability/reliability growth, and TEMP/Strategy/STE planning. Distinct routing from dod-te-guidebook (same guidebook family, pathway-deep pack). Guidance only—defer to DoDI 5000.89 and Title 10 for binding requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the GAO Technology Readiness Assessment Guide (GAO-20-48G, 2020). Use for evaluating technology maturity in acquisition programs and projects: Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9) and related scales (MRL, IRL), identifying Critical Technology Elements (CTEs), the five-step process for a high-quality TRA, the four characteristics of a reliable TRA (comprehensive, well-documented, credible, defensible), Technology Maturation Plans (TMPs), and using TRA results in knowledge-based, milestone decisions. Assessment/maturity oriented: it measures readiness and frames risk — it is not a full SE process model, cost-estimating, or schedule guide (see sibling packs for those).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide (GAO-16-89G, 2015). Use for building, assessing, or auditing a program's integrated master schedule (IMS): the ten best practices of a reliable schedule (capture, sequence, resource, duration, traceability, valid critical path, reasonable total float, schedule risk analysis, updating, baseline), the four characteristics (comprehensive, well-constructed, credible, controlled), critical path method arithmetic (forward/backward pass, total float), schedule risk analysis (Monte Carlo, contingency), statusing and baseline control, and the Appendix II audit triad. Scheduling/time-management oriented: it is the authority on schedule reliability, but it is NOT a cost-estimating guide, a full SE process model, an agile guide, or a risk-management framework — see sibling packs (gao-cost, dau-se-guidebook, nasa-schedule, nasa-risk) for those.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。