「eth」の検索結果

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks cyclomatic complexity, nesting, long methods, god classes, method signatures, O(n²), N+1 queries, constants management. Returns findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement 10 advanced AI agent node types for any DSL/runtime system — plan compiler, code interpreter, critique loops, intelligent routing, multi-agent ensemble, persistent memory, external API tools, iterative loops, data transforms, and parallel execution. Use this skill whenever the user wants to add agent capabilities to a workflow engine, build an AI orchestration framework, implement Karpathy-style AI upgrades, add new node types to a DSL runtime, or create autonomous agent pipelines. Also trigger when the user mentions AetherLang, flow engines, node types, agent frameworks, or wants to upgrade their AI system with capabilities like self-programming, reflection, routing, ensemble, memory, or tool use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track AI visibility — measure whether a brand is mentioned and cited by AI assistants (Gemini, ChatGPT, Perplexity) for target prompts. Runs scans, tracks mention/citation rates over time, detects trends, and identifies opportunities. Uses Gemini API free tier (with grounding) as primary method, web search as fallback. Use when a user wants to: check if AI models mention their brand, track AI citation changes over time, measure AEO content effectiveness, monitor competitor AI visibility, or audit their brand's presence in AI-generated answers. Pairs with aeo-prompt-research-free (identifies prompts) and aeo-content-free (creates/refreshes content). This skill closes the loop by measuring results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Core statistical methodology and pedagogical approach for all Inquiro analyses. Always loaded to maintain teaching quality and reproducibility standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Skill design knowledge base — mechanisms, philosophy, patterns, pitfalls. Use when: designing new skills, reviewing skill quality, or deciding whether something should be a skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Application of Six Sigma quality methodology to AI agent process improvement and reliability

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GOMS cognitive modeling methodology for analyzing human-computer interaction task performance

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building Grafana dashboards backed by Prometheus, Loki, or Tempo, designing PromQL/LogQL queries, wiring template variables, setting alert rules, building SLO dashboards, or maintaining dashboards as code. Triggers: rate() vs increase() confusion, irate vs rate, label_replace, recording rules, alerting rule expressions, multi-dimensional template variables, ad-hoc filters, dashboard JSON model, provisioning via Terraform/grafonnet, p99 / histogram_quantile usage. NOT for Datadog/New Relic dashboards (vendor-specific), Grafana plugin development, or Loki ingestion pipeline tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytical methods for decomposing expert performance into cognitive and physical task components

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cognitive Systems Engineering design methodology for joint cognitive systems and human-centered automation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integration of BDI agent architecture with soft systems methodology for complex organizational problem-solving

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Methodology for eliciting expert knowledge about cognitive processes, decisions, and mental models in complex tasks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for eliciting, representing, and operationalizing expert cognitive skills—pattern recognition, situation assessment, mental simulation—from practitioners without requiring research training. Bridges academic rigor and practical usability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CEO/founder-mode plan review: rethink the problem, find the 10x product, challenge premises, expand scope. Four modes, dream-big to strip-to-essentials. Use to rethink ambition or scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. Use AFTER a plan exists. For validating the idea itself before planning, use /mk:office-hours first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until the problem, requirements, goals, non-goals, and constraints are CONFIRMED, then deliver a single verdict — do, don't, cheaper alternatives, trade-offs, ordered checklist, success metrics. Required: the user wants exactly ONE recommendation — not options, not a debate — and their framing is open to challenge (advise may answer a different question than the one asked). Triggers on "what should I do about X", "advise me on X", "am I approaching this right", "is this the right move". Do NOT use to be interrogated with no recommendation (→ mk:grill) — advise also interviews one question at a time, but only to reach a verdict. Do NOT use when the framing is settled and only the options are open (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to decide whether something is worth building (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when you want several perspectives to argue it out (→ mk:party).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ruLake as the agent's working memory. Auto-invoke /rulake-memory:memory-recall when the agent needs to look up something it might already know; auto-invoke /rulake-memory:memory-remember after the agent learns or decides something worth pinning. Closes the self-learning loop without requiring the agent author to wire it explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for ANY of the following — do not skip it even if the query seems simple: strategic decisions, business analysis, thesis building, complex problem solving, geopolitical analysis (non-market), philosophical reasoning, academic research, system design, decision under uncertainty, long-form thinking, or any question that benefits from First Principle deconstruction and multi-agent reasoning. ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks about: why something works the way it does, whether a decision is correct, how to think about a complex problem, what could go wrong, analyzing a situation from multiple angles, or any "should I..." question involving real-world trade-offs. This is NOT a market/trading skill — for financial markets, BTC, gold, stocks, forex, macro economics, use money-atlas-intelligence-os instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Up-to-date Zig programming language patterns for version 0.17.0-dev (0.16.0 stable APIs plus the 0.17 deltas). Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging Zig code, working with build.zig and build.zig.zon files, or using comptime metaprogramming. Critical for avoiding outdated patterns from training data - especially std.net→std.Io.net (requires Io instance), std.time timestamps removed (use clock_gettime), std.Thread.Mutex/Condition/sleep removed (use pthreads), std.crypto.random removed, build system APIs (root_module, Compile methods→Module methods), I/O APIs (buffered writer pattern), container initialization (.empty/.init), allocator selection (DebugAllocator), ArrayList now unmanaged by default, @typeInfo lowercase fields (.@"struct" not .Struct), and removed language features (async/await, usingnamespace). Also covers 0.17.0-dev deltas: b.args→run_cmd.addPassthruArgs(), std.gpu→std.spirv, @bitCast logical-bit (endian-agnostic) semantics, build configurer/maker split, and the zig-pkg/ package directory. Also covers quality tooling Zig does not ship: coverage with kcov (and why in-file tests wreck the denominator), detecting unused private functions (neither the compiler nor zlint's unused-decls finds them), duplicate detection with jscpd, zlint (NOT the same-named X.509 linter in Homebrew), and the built-in fuzzer whose testOne now takes *std.testing.Smith rather than []const u8.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates statistical power for high-dimensional genomics experiments (bulk RNA-seq, scRNA-seq, ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, methylation, proteomics) under negative-binomial count models using RNASeqPower, PROPER, and simulation via powsimR, distinguishing per-gene from marginal (transcriptome-wide) power, the role of mean expression and dispersion, and the sequencing-depth-versus-replicate tradeoff. Covers simulation as the honest default for overdispersed counts, FDR-aware average power versus single-test power, observed/post-hoc power as an anti-pattern, and the winner's-curse / Type-S / Type-M consequences of underpowering. Use when planning replicate number for a sequencing experiment, deciding whether to add depth or samples, choosing closed-form versus simulation power, estimating power from pilot dispersions, or justifying replication in a grant. For clinical-trial power see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the inverse sample-size question see experimental-design/sample-size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calls m6A peaks from MeRIP-seq / m6A-seq paired IP-vs-input data using exomePeak2 (transcript-aware, GC-bias-corrected Poisson GLM), MeTPeak (HMM over sliding windows), MACS3/MACS2 with --nomodel --broad --keep-dup all (genome-wide broad alternative), and DRACH motif enrichment via HOMER or ggseqlogo as a sanity check (NOT a filter). Covers BED12 vs narrowPeak output, exonic vs intronic peak handling, multi-tool reconciliation (intersection vs union), the m6A-vs-m6Am ambiguity at 5'UTR peaks that antibody methods cannot resolve, and orthogonal validation (miCLIP/GLORI/m6A-SAC-seq/m6Anet). Use when calling peaks from paired IP/input genome BAMs, choosing exomePeak2 (transcript-aware default) vs MACS3 (broad genomic) vs MeTPeak (HMM-smoothed low-coverage), confirming DRACH enrichment as a sanity check on the peak set, reconciling differing peak sets across tools, validating MeRIP peaks against single-base methods, interpreting 5' peaks where m6Am contamination is possible, or recommending a consensus strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs genomics experiments so technical nuisance variation (batch, lane, plate, flow cell, operator, reagent lot, processing day) is balanced against the biological variable of interest and therefore estimable rather than confounded, using constrained sample-to-batch assignment (designit, OSAT), the confounder/mediator/collider distinction, and the principle that no post-hoc correction recovers a fully confounded design. Covers detecting hidden batches with surrogate variable analysis, a decision table for downstream correction (ComBat-seq, RUVSeq, SVA) whose execution is deferred to differential-expression/batch-correction, and reproducibility metadata. Use when assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates, avoiding batch-condition confounding, deciding whether a design is salvageable by correction, choosing a correction method, or estimating the number of hidden batches. For the experimental unit, randomization, and blocking concepts see experimental-design/randomization-blocking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infer gene regulatory networks from bulk or general expression data with mutual-information (ARACNe) and tree-ensemble (GENIE3, GRNBoost2) methods, and infer transcription-factor protein activity from regulons with VIPER and msVIPER. Covers the activity-not-edges paradigm, the undirected-association caveat, the DREAM5 wisdom-of-crowds and method-complementarity result, AUPRC-over-AUROC evaluation, and gold-standard incompleteness. Use when inferring a regulatory network from a bulk expression matrix, finding master regulators, or scoring TF activity from a signature. For single-cell motif-pruned regulons see scenic-regulons; for co-expression modules see coexpression-networks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。