「builder」の検索結果

Create interactive data visualizations using Vega-Lite declarative JSON grammar. Supports 20+ chart types (bar, line, scatter, histogram, boxplot, grouped/stacked variations, etc.) via templates and programmatic builders. Use when users upload data for charting, request specific chart types, or mention visualizations. Produces portable JSON specs with inline data islands that work in Claude artifacts and can be adapted for production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new Claude Code Skills with proper YAML frontmatter, progressive disclosure structure, and complete directory organization. Use when you need to build custom skills for specific workflows, generate skill templates, or understand the Claude Skills specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and write deterministic multi-agent workflow scripts (.js files in .claude/workflows/) for Claude Code's Workflow tool. Use when a user wants to build, create, author, scaffold, or run a custom Claude Code workflow, orchestrate sub-agents (fan-out, pipeline, loop, judge-panel), or automate a repeatable multi-step task across fresh-context agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create targeted resume sections optimized for different experience levels and roles

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format professional references properly and prepare reference materials

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format CVs for academic positions with publications, grants, and teaching

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides Lovart Agent from one visual reference to a coherent brand system, campaign assets, and packaging concepts through a gated creative-direction workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

将用户的数据分析需求转化为结构化的分析计划并与用户确认。用户提出 BI 业务分析、数据探索、统计建模等需要规划的分析任务时使用。简单数据查询、公式明确的定量计算等流程简单、无需规划的任务不使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build production-quality CLIs with language detection and a five-step approval-gated workflow. Use when wrapping an existing module or app. Don't use for GUI/TUI apps, web APIs, or one-off shell scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a single tweet or short auto-thread for X (Twitter) using a 2026 X hook formula (one-liner contrarian, data-point, build-in-public, mini-list, relatable cold-open), picked by goal (replies, reposts, likes, bookmarks). Respects the 280-char limit (25,000 on Premium), runs the humanizer pass, and publishes via Publora on approval. Use to write a tweet from notes. Not for long threads (use x-thread-builder) or auditing a draft (use x-humanizer --mode audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a weekly X (Twitter) content plan from a theme, audience, and content pillars. Produces per-day recommendations (single tweet vs thread, X hook formula, angle, posting time, primary goal), a single-to-thread mix, daily reply and quote-tweet targets, and a goal-mix balance check across replies, reposts, likes, and bookmarks. Use when the user wants to plan a week of X content instead of ad-hoc posting. Not for drafting one tweet (use x-post-writer) or one thread (use x-thread-builder).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer the hook from a viral X (Twitter) tweet or thread URL. Identifies which of the 10 canonical 2026 X formulas it uses (one-liner contrarian, data-point, build-in-public, quote-tweet, mini-list, relatable cold-open, listicle-thread, story thread, curiosity-gap, how-I teardown), explains why it worked, and returns a blank template mapped to your topic with its primary goal. Use to learn from a tweet you admire. Not for writing your own (use x-post-writer or x-thread-builder).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repurpose existing content into a native X (Twitter) post or thread. Take a LinkedIn post, blog, YouTube script, or newsletter and rewrite it for X: re-hook for the no-fold first line, refit to 280 chars or a thread, strip off-platform artifacts, run the humanizer, publish via Publora on approval. Not for writing from scratch (use x-post-writer or x-thread-builder), not for auditing a draft (use x-humanizer --mode audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a long-form X (Twitter) thread (tweetstorm) using a 2026 thread formula (listicle-thread, story thread, curiosity-gap opener, how-I teardown), picked by goal (bookmarks, likes, reposts, replies). Structures tweet 1 as a promise plus open loop, paces one beat per tweet, and closes for the repost. Publishes via Publora, which auto-splits long content into a numbered (1/N) thread. Not for single tweets (use x-post-writer) or auditing a draft (use x-humanizer --mode audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new Claude Code Skills with proper YAML frontmatter, progressive disclosure structure, and complete directory organization. Use when you need to build custom skills for specific workflows, generate skill templates, or understand the Claude Skills specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned operations-architecture discipline that fixes the shape of a system before anyone builds it: entity schema first, exactly one write path per entity, every unit of work routed to a deterministic automation, an AI agent, or a human decision, every existing tool marked absorb, keep, or kill, and the build sequenced into phases whose completion is proved by a command. Use when scoping an automation or agent build, deciding whether a workflow needs a model at all, consolidating a sprawling tool stack, designing the data model under a workflow, choosing a migration path off an old system, or ordering a build so nothing lands on a moving foundation. NOT FOR: executing a planned multi-file repo change (use suede-graph-flo-xr); coordinating parallel builders with file ownership (use suede-agent-teams); lead lifecycle, scoring, and CRM routing rules (use suede-revops); proving agent output quality against an eval set (use suede-ai-eval); reviewing the finished diff (use suede-code-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI full-stack surface builder that runs design, copy, and visual QA as one pass: landing pages, brand surfaces, product UI, dashboards, campaigns, launch pages, and reference-to-target restyles (suedify). Use when a build needs layout and words together, when a redesign or launch surface has to ship end to end, when the request is 'make this site look like that one', or when design, copy, asset, and QA lanes have to move at once. NOT FOR: a design-token, dark-mode, or single-component decision (use suede-design); copy with no layout work (use johnny-suede-write, or suede-copy for one standalone conversion surface); conversion and funnel architecture (use suede-site-alchemy); multi-agent orchestration protocols, WIP protection, and rollback trees (use suede-agent-teams).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Labs agent-team orchestrator: split complex work into coordinated lanes with explicit file ownership, WIP collision detection, quality gates, escalation thresholds, rollback plans, and handoffs that prove what shipped. Use when one shared change needs safe parallel ownership across builders and reviewers, when a lane map must be resolved before anyone opens a file, or when running a repeatable public-repository contribution program with issue scoring, atomic task leases, isolated worktrees, and explicit publication authority. NOT FOR: one repo change a bundled DAG can run end to end (use suede-graph-flo-xr); findings-only review of a diff (use suede-code-review) or an A-F ship grade (use suede-code-grader); CI, branch protection, or merge-gate wiring (use suede-ci-gate); branch and worktree setup on a stale mirror (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a written, reviewable plan or spec produced before coding starts. Triggers on: mapping out changes without implementing, thinking through risks of upgrades or migrations, evaluating approaches before committing to one, writing specs for team review, phasing work into stages, or any request that explicitly defers coding ('don't implement yet', 'before we build'). The distinguishing signal is that the user wants a plan artifact — not implementation, not a conversational answer. MUST activates inside Claude's native plan mode to have a better planning behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate unexpected behavior and mysterious bugs. Use when the cause of a problem is unknown and the user needs to understand WHY something is happening — symptoms like: sudden unexplained changes in metrics or behavior, works locally but not in staging/production, inconsistent or intermittent failures, correct code producing wrong results, operations succeeding but having no effect, environment-specific failures, duplicate executions, stale data, or any "why did this change?" or "why is this happening?" situation. Covers infrastructure anomalies (cache hit rates dropping, latency spikes, queue behavior shifts) as well as code bugs. The key signal is confusion about root cause, not a request to implement a known fix. Do NOT use for feature requests, known fixes, planning, or documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about code, architecture, and technical decisions — no implementation. Trigger on questions asking 'why', 'what does this do', 'what is the purpose of', 'explain', 'what's the difference', 'compare', or 'what are the tradeoffs' — even when referencing specific files, code snippets, or inline code. The key signal is the user wants to UNDERSTAND something, not change it. Do NOT trigger for requests to build, fix, plan, review, research, or add/modify code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch up-to-date documentation for any library, framework, API, or service into context. Use when the user wants to look up API references, check function signatures or required fields, find feature-specific docs, or verify how an external tool actually works. Triggers for queries about third-party libraries like Stripe, SQLAlchemy, Tailwind, FastAPI, shadcn, Drizzle, Hono, Better Auth — any time the answer lives in official docs rather than in the project codebase. Use this instead of guessing from trained knowledge, which is stale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for ANY work involving React, Next.js, TypeScript, or Tailwind in the browser layer. This includes building components and pages, but equally covers debugging and fixing frontend issues: CSS/Tailwind classes not applying, form validation behavior, hydration mismatches between server and client renders, styling bugs, layout shifts, and rendering problems. Also use for refactoring components (e.g., splitting Server vs Client Components), data fetching patterns, state management, bundle optimization, and frontend tooling. If the problem involves what users see or interact with in a web browser — whether building, fixing, or refactoring — use this skill. Not for backend APIs, databases, infrastructure, or DevOps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。