5,928 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when a task needs the judgment of an agricultural engineer — sizing a center-pivot or drip irrigation system's peak capacity against crop water demand, computing lateral grain-bin wall pressure with Janssen's equation, sizing a waterway or tile-drainage system with Manning's equation and an NRCS design-storm return period, or building a manure/nutrient first-year availability mass balance against a crop's N requirement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and work with ENCODE single-cell genomics data including scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq. Use when the user asks about single-cell experiments, cell type resolution, clustering from ENCODE data, deconvolution of bulk signals using single-cell references, or comparing single-cell vs bulk profiles. Covers platform differences (10X Chromium, Smart-seq2, Drop-seq), quality limitations of single-cell data, multimodal integration (RNA+ATAC), and cross-study reproducibility concerns. Also use for cell type annotation, gene detection limits, dropout artifacts, and single-cell data structure in ENCODE.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage architecture RFCs: create, review, list, update, and transition status. Use when user mentions "RFC", "technical proposal", "architecture proposal", or wants to draft, review, list, update, or change status of RFCs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares Go applications to work effectively with AI coding agents. Use when setting up a new Go project or retrofitting an existing one to ensure: structured JSON logging (slog/Zap/ZeroLog/Logrus), machine-readable command output, thorough golangci-lint configuration, non-interactive CLI design with --yes flags, structured error handling with meaningful exit codes, proper context.Context propagation, graceful shutdown, health check endpoints, and a standardized Makefile. Triggers when a user asks to make their Go app "agent-ready," "AI-friendly," wants to improve agent tooling/observability in a Go project, or needs to audit an existing Go project against agent-readiness best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a grant management system for proposal workflow efficiency, deadline tracking, budget-narrative alignment, outcome reporting, compliance readiness, and win rate optimization. Use when reviewing nonprofit grant software, building a grants CRM, analyzing proposal pipelines, or evaluating funder reporting tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a student information system for dropout risk prediction. Analyzes attendance patterns, grade trajectories, behavioral indicators, early warning model accuracy, intervention tracking, equity in risk scoring, and socioeconomic factor integration..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze catastrophe modeling systems for natural disaster exposure, PML estimation, and reinsurance optimization. Use when: 'assess cat model', 'evaluate disaster exposure', 'review PML calculations', 'audit reinsurance program', 'check exposure data quality', 'analyze hurricane/earthquake risk models', 'evaluate Oasis or RMS setup'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit precision agriculture and crop management software for yield prediction model accuracy, soil analysis integration, irrigation optimization algorithms, pest and disease detection pipelines, satellite and drone imagery processing, weather data integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a concrete technical proposal with evidence and tradeoffs when a decision needs design. No implementation or automatic reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a user flow for friction and drop-off points. Use when the user says "UX audit", "audit this flow", "where are users dropping off", "why isn't this converting", "review the onboarding", "usability audit", "what's causing friction", "user journey review", or wants to identify why users struggle with a flow - even if they don't explicitly say "UX audit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a repo's agent context — CLAUDE.md files, codebase docs, skills, and tool/MCP designs — against Anthropic's Claude 5 context-engineering guidance ("unhobbling": Anthropic cut ~80% of Claude Code's system prompt with no eval loss). Finds overconstraint, conflicting instructions, redundancy, stale facts, and missing "unknown knowns"; produces a scored findings report with concrete rewrites, then applies approved fixes. Use when someone says "audit my CLAUDE.md", "context audit", "unhobble this repo", "review our agent docs/skills/tools", or after upgrading to Claude 5-generation models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explicit-only last resort. Draws game art from code, with no image model - pixel sprites from a PixelSpec, flat vector props, UI and icons from portable SVG, rigged characters with planted feet, FX with a JS runtime, seam-proven autotiles, playable top-down layouts with collision, stylized parallax and ambient plate motion - palette-exact, with QA and review sheets. Use only when the user explicitly asks for code-drawn art, or when generate2dmedia route_media.py finds no image or video route (no-route, exit 3). Never the default - image generation (generate2dsprite, generate2dmap, video2dsprite) comes first for characters, props, maps and FX. Not for painterly, detailed or likeness art, HD-2D plates or realistic fire, smoke or water. Always disclose the result as code-drawn.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Make game-ready 2D characters, creatures, props, icons and FX as master stills, sprite sheets or animation clips. Plan size, motion and finish; generate the art (image generation is the default, through generate2dmedia route_media.py - the API when a key is configured, else the local Codex or Grok CLI); approve one master still per character; then key, slice, register, scale, palette, QA and export frames for a game engine (Aseprite JSON, Godot SpriteFrames or Sprite3D). HD finish by default, pixel finish on request. Character animation is one image-to-video clip per action from the master (video2dsprite); sheets are for FX, icons and props. Use for sprites, masters, sheets, frame-by-frame animation and packaging frames from any source. Not for maps, tiles or backgrounds (generate2dmap), video clips (video2dsprite), code-drawn art (codeart2d, only on request) or calling an image or video API by itself (generate2dmedia).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages Google Analytics reporting data, enables the Analytics Data API via the Cloud CLI, and creates reports using the Google Analytics Data API (v1beta). Use when you need to interact with Google Analytics properties, run customized analytics reports, query metrics (like activeUsers, screenPageViews) and dimensions (like city, date), check metrics and dimensions compatibility, or verify API enablement. Don't use for Google Analytics Admin API operations (e.g., creating properties, managing users) or for front-end tracking installation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when overriding the default UI of an Agentforce agent action's Apex input or output with your own Lightning web components via a LightningTypeBundle (schema.json + editor.json/renderer.json, lightning__AgentforceInput / lightning__AgentforceOutput targets, the @apexClassType binding). NOT for standard agent actions with primitive inputs/outputs (only Apex-class input/output can be overridden), NOT for Flow screen custom property editors (use flow/flow-custom-property-editors), and NOT for general LWC-in-Lightning-page work (use lwc/* skills).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when defining clinical data model requirements for Health Cloud: HL7/FHIR data mapping, interoperability requirements, FHIR R4-aligned object activation, CodeableConcept constraints, and middleware translation requirements. NOT for the field-level mapping work itself — use data/fhir-data-mapping. NOT for choosing legacy HC24__ EHR objects vs standard clinical objects — use data/health-cloud-data-model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture. Includes React 19 API changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map a codebase into feature-grouped flowcharts, identify duplicated concerns across features, and propose a unified architecture. Use when asked to "find the ideal path," unify duplicated systems, or audit architecture before a refactor. Emits a proposed unified flowchart plus per-system /make-plan prompts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous bug-elimination loop. Iteratively invokes /bug-hunt and /implement-batch until findings converge below an operator-specified severity floor. At termination, runs /review-test scoped to the run's new reproducing tests and fixes quality issues above the floor. Auto-approves /bug-hunt and /review-test ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, repeated implementation failure, hard-cap exhaustion, or breaking-change proposals. Optional /refactor finisher.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prospective failure imagination for a plan, decision, or running system. Operates in two modes — **plan mode** (a plan has not yet been committed to; imagine its catastrophic failure broadly) and **scenario mode** (a specific catastrophic scenario is posed against an existing system; investigate causes against the actual code and architecture). Spawns parallel pre-mortemers in isolation across three categories of lens: standard failure classes (technical, operational, estimation, scope, adoption, dependency, team, incentive, detection, reversibility, adversarial), 0-3 ad-hoc target-specific lenses the orchestrator names when warranted, and a first-principles lens that always runs to catch what the prescribed taxonomy misses. Synthesizes into a prioritized risk register with early-warning signals. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous comprehensive refactoring. Three-phase pipeline — Phase 1 /refactor (tactical, loops internally to convergence) → Phase 2 loop of /review-arch + /implement-batch until architectural findings converge below a severity floor (default HIGH+) → Phase 3 /refactor (catches tactical issues introduced by restructuring). Auto-approves /review-arch ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, breaking-change proposals, repeated implementation failure, or Phase-2 hard-cap exhaustion (5 architectural iterations).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。