「reviews」の検索結果

Perform comprehensive technical reviews of Ruby on Rails applications. Runs automated analysis tools (RubyCritic, Brakeman, bundler-audit, Gitleaks, Debride, linters, SimpleCov, Rails stats, Rails ERD), analyzes code for architecture, security, authorization (Pundit/CanCanCan), dead code, and design issues, and produces a structured markdown report with prioritized findings and a 0-10 score. Use when the user requests a tech review, code audit, project assessment, or quality analysis of a Rails application.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SOLID design review rules (SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP) for code reviews: what counts as a real design finding, what is only taste, how to cite it and how severe it is. Use when reviewing a diff, a pull request or recent changes for design problems, when asked for a "SOLID review", "design review", "is this class doing too much", or when a review checklist asks for SOLID. Pair it with the dry skill for duplication and with owasp-asvs for security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) review rules for code reviews: find the same knowledge — a rule, a constant, a parser, a validation, a protocol detail — implemented in several places that must change together, and tell it apart from code that merely looks alike. Use when reviewing a diff, a pull request or recent changes for duplication, on "DRY review", "is this duplicated", "copy-paste check", or when a review checklist asks for DRY. Pair it with the solid skill for design and with owasp-asvs for security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP ASVS v5.0 security verification skill with Drupal 11 mappings. Use when performing security code reviews, implementing security requirements, or verifying security compliance in Drupal projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit agent runtimes and their tests for lifecycle inference, capability overload, context pollution, correlated verification, prompt-only control, false success, dead compatibility paths, test-only seams, and complexity without contribution. Use for whole-repository agent audits, slop or dead-code triage, test contribution reviews, large refactors, tool/context simplification, and cleanup requests that need proof before deleting code or tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope, preregister, execute, audit, normalize, and publish GEODE evaluations with research-question, reproduction, attempt-lineage, trajectory, verifier-receipt, and immutable artifact contracts. Use for benchmark runs or comparisons, eval-artifact and cache-accounting audits, GPT or subscription result normalization, research question or hypothesis framing, retry diagnosis, trajectory publication, DPO or reward-data readiness reviews, and requests involving MCPMark, tau2, BFCL, Agent-World, HAL, Terminal-Bench, or Toolathlon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use an available Codex MCP integration as a read-only second-opinion verifier for GEODE code reviews, GAP audits, and contract checks. Use only when the user requests Codex cross-checking and the current tool inventory exposes the required MCP tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Align, run, audit, and publish GEODE benchmark comparisons against Agent-World arXiv 2604.18292v1 across MCP-Mark, BFCL V4, and tau2-bench. Use for Agent-World or AgentWorld comparison requests, cross-suite agent benchmark design, Tau2 comparator/profile diagnosis, paired thin-runtime-versus-GEODE experiments, mean-accuracy@8 replication, or benchmark comparability and artifact reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts healthcare chart audit protocols covering clinical documentation review, coding accuracy, and billing compliance. Aligns with Medicare CoPs, OIG Compliance Program Guidance, RAC preparedness, federal sentencing guidelines, and the 60-day overpayment rule. Use when drafting routine periodic audits, targeted risk reviews, proactive compliance measures, or post-regulatory-update assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a BSA/AML Risk Assessment for U.S. financial institutions per FinCEN, FFIEC, and OCC standards. Evaluates inherent risks (customer, product, geographic, transaction, third-party), control adequacy, and residual risk. Use when preparing annual BSA compliance assessments, post-acquisition integration reviews, or when business changes trigger reassessment under 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts Articles of Dissolution (Certificate of Dissolution) for U.S. corporations to terminate legal existence via state filing. Reviews articles of incorporation, bylaws, board resolutions, and shareholder consents for jurisdiction-specific compliance. Use when preparing dissolution filings, terminating a corporation, or drafting dissolution certificates for Secretary of State submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured 500-800 word summaries of legal articles distilling thesis, methodology, arguments, authorities, conclusions, and significance. Triggers when summarizing legal scholarship, reviewing law review articles, preparing literature reviews, or triaging articles for full reading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a GitHub PR with a shallow correctness/security/breaking/AI-slop checklist and emits a verdict; optionally posts via gh. NOT for own-diff audit (mk:review); NOT for replying (mk:respond-pr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow navigator: scans project state (plans, reviews, tests, git) and recommends the next pipeline step. Use for 'what next?' or 'where am I?'. NOT for complexity routing (mk:scale-routing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing UI components, reviewing visual design, building design systems, or checking accessibility. Auto-activates on frontend design tasks and UI reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforces KISS/DRY/YAGNI during authoring and ad-hoc reviews: concise, direct, no unneeded comments. NOT for post-hoc diff/PR review (mk:review); NOT for simplification passes (mk:simplify).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced vulnerability analysis principles. OWASP Top 10 baseline + current threat landscape awareness, Supply Chain Security, attack surface mapping, risk prioritization. Use when performing security audits, threat modeling, or OWASP reviews. NOT for STRIDE/CSO-mode infrastructure audits (see mk:cso).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a GitHub PR with a single shallow correctness/security/breaking/AI-slop checklist and emits a verdict; optionally posts it via gh pr review. Use to review an external or teammate PR. NOT for deep pre-landing audit of your own diff (see mk:review); NOT for responding to received review comments (see mk:respond-pr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when refining a draft user prompt before sending it to a coding agent. Decomposes goal/context/constraints/acceptance/output-format, detects ambiguity and model-coupled framing, then emits a model-agnostic rewrite. Supports --analyze, --score, and --deep. NOT for prompts from scratch (mk:brainstorming), plans/reviews (mk:elicit), implementation plans (mk:plan-creator), or general codebase scouting (mk:scout).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow navigation assistant. Scans project state (plans, reviews, tests, git) and recommends the next step in the 7-phase pipeline. Use when asked "what should I do next?", "where am I?", "help", or at session start. NOT for domain complexity routing (see mk:scale-routing); NOT for skill discovery (descriptions handle that automatically).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing UI components, reviewing visual design, building design systems, or checking accessibility. Auto-activates on frontend design tasks and UI reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforces KISS/DRY/YAGNI during authoring and ad-hoc quality reviews. Pragmatic standards: concise, direct, no unnecessary comments. NOT for post-hoc diff/PR review (see mk:review); NOT for behavior-preserving simplification passes (see mk:simplify).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review approved Grafana business-intelligence evidence for revenue, conversion, and operational KPIs. Use for bounded KPI scorecards, financial or operational metric checks, baseline comparisons, and business-unit reviews without changing source systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish, author, restructure, or audit human-first processor Architecture, Design, Research, Review, and Verification documentation. Use for progressive documentation scaffolding, authority maps, reading paths, document-type content contracts, length-budgeted splitting, or maintainability reviews. Do not use as a substitute for cycle-accurate microarchitecture analysis or RTL implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。