「score」の検索結果

Use at write time to vector/embedding memory — Grove content-addressed insertion, chroma/pgvector upserts, memory-consolidation promoting session traces to MEMORY.md, or embedding externally-ingested content. Scores each candidate record against a fixed panel of sentinel queries and quarantines any record that would become the nearest neighbor of too many unrelated queries — a hub — whether from adversarial poisoning or accidental over-generality. This is the memory-record-side sibling of skill-injection-guardian (file-side) and the write-side complement of memory-use-warrant (read-side). Quarantine, never silently drop; a human reviews. Backed by the admission-time hubness gate (arxiv 2606.19692v1). Triggers on inserting into vector memory, consolidating memory, and embedding stranger content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit code changes against Karpathy's 4 principles (Think Before Coding, Simplicity First, Surgical Changes, Goal-Driven Execution). Auto-called after Phase 5 IMPLEMENT; can also be invoked manually. Produces scored compliance report and blocks advancement if threshold not met.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing. Produces professional scorecard with evidence-based ratings and actionable recommendations. (project, gitignored)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides pytest test architecture for Python 3.11+ using behavioral contracts, risk, and maintenance-adjusted value. Use when choosing unit/integration/property/e2e boundaries, fixture strategy, coverage measurement, or mutation testing. Preserves existing project gates but does not invent test-pyramid ratios, coverage percentages, mutation-score targets, or tests for implementation detail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format and score completed plugin assessment findings without starting another assessment workflow. Use when a plugin assessment needs the standard report structure, scoring criteria, severity breakdown, or marketplace-readiness result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Deepline GTM work that searches, enriches, scores, collects signals, or automates a workflow: find companies or people, enrich a CSV, find emails or LinkedIn, compare providers, build a waterfall, create a webhook or cron, or write a Play. For live information work, run a small heterogeneous experiment, exploit the observed winner, and reopen misses. Skip pure copywriting and non-GTM research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DRAFT. Use when running a Luma-centered GTM event campaign: pull/export guests, enrich and score, draft invites and social, stage email+LI sequences paused for approval, and wire registration sync. Not installed by deepline skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads model uncertainty from token log-probabilities. Covers collecting logprobs and aggregating multi-token labels, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration assessment with ECE, Brier scores, and reliability diagrams against human labels, responsible downstream use of confidence, and reproducibility archives. Use when the user asks about classifier confidence by item, logprobs, top-k tokens, calibration, ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams, or routing low-confidence cases to human review. Codebook and validation design go to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codified expertise for managing carrier portfolios, negotiating freight rates, tracking carrier performance, allocating freight, and maintaining strategic carrier relationships. Informed by transportation managers with 15+ years experience. Includes scorecarding frameworks, RFP processes, market intelligence, and compliance vetting. Use when managing carriers, negotiating rates, evaluating carrier performance, or building freight strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score your Claude Code environment on a fun 0-10 ladder (Tourist → Swarm) calibrated to the quickstart's 4 systems — Context, Skills, Integrations, Orchestration. Two front doors - an interactive quiz (zero setup, shareable) or a silent scan of your repo. Outputs a next-level roadmap plus a branded HTML dashboard or a paste-anywhere ASCII card. The default mastery skill of this quickstart. Triggers - "level", "what's my claude code level", "claude code level quiz", "assess my setup", "how good is my setup", "claude code maturity"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score your Claude Code environment on a fun 0-10 ladder (Tourist → Swarm) calibrated to the quickstart's 4 systems — Context, Skills, Integrations, Orchestration. Two front doors - an interactive quiz (zero setup, shareable) or a silent scan of your repo. Outputs a next-level roadmap plus a branded HTML dashboard or a paste-anywhere ASCII card. The default mastery skill of this quickstart. Triggers - "level", "what's my claude code level", "claude code level quiz", "assess my setup", "how good is my setup", "claude code maturity"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate one Anabasis v2 campaign from its log and turn what it shows into findings with one owner each. Answers whether a comparison's reading (step, no-step, not-scored) may be believed, whether a fail was the solver's or the exam's, whether the harness could know the exam, whether the tasks bracket the solver, whether the campaign is climbing, and where the hours and dollars went. Reads evidence; starts no solve, session or round, and changes no verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Эксперт по оптимизации Facebook Ads. Используй для анализа метрик, Health Score, ad-eater detection и рекомендаций по бюджетам.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you want to benchmark and improve an existing repo skill through repeated evals, prompt mutations, and score tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you want campaign performance reviewed against benchmarks, with a health score and prioritized optimization recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetches tweets from Twitter List, scores them using data metrics and AI analysis, and generates topic recommendation reports for content creators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or fix the hook of a papercut reel. Produces the SAY / WRITE / SHOW / ALIGN block, five variants scored with the hook check, the frame-0 cover title and the motion out of the hook. Use for "write a hook for...", or when a reel's first three seconds lose people.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about evolution progress, current scores, best version, how many iterations ran, or whether the loop is stagnating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to verify that the evolved agent's score is stable and reliable. Runs evaluation multiple times and reports mean ± std.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit or design generative AI interfaces against three diagnostic pillars (deterministic-stochastic balance, interaction density, visual cohesion). Treats taste as a measurable control system, not subjective preference. Use when: 'taste audit', 'score this UI', 'design quality', 'interaction density', 'visual cohesion', 'refiner layer', 'correction cost', 'why does this feel off', 'polish this', 'design review', or building any user-facing AI product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full marketing audit — runs all relevant checklists against your product, site, and marketing in one go. Covers SEO, content, email, ads, social media, CRO, landing pages, technical SEO, and creative production. Produces a "state of your marketing" report with health scores per area and a prioritized fix list. Use when "marketing audit", "full audit", "audit everything", "marketing health check", "what's broken", "state of marketing", or any request to comprehensively assess marketing across all channels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。