「qa」の検索結果

Design traceable data checks for reconciliation, integrity, transactions, and atomicity with separate observable oracles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select traceable regression coverage from change impact, affected risks, criteria, dependencies, and prior defects rather than execution convenience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design traceable accessibility checks that combine scanners with observable keyboard, focus, semantic, and assistive-technology behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage defects with independent severity and priority, reproducible evidence, preserved attempt history, and explicit resolution retesting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a code diff or explicit file set through independent correctness and QA lenses. Use when the user asks for a code review, test-coverage assessment, pre-merge audit, or review gate in a PWDEV Flow workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write comprehensive end-to-end tests that verify complete user workflows, integration between components, and system behavior from user perspective using Playwright, Cypress, or similar frameworks. Use when testing user flows, verifying feature integration, testing across real browsers, ensuring UI interactions work correctly, validating form submissions end-to-end, testing authentication flows, catching regressions, automating QA processes, testing API integrations, or building confidence in production deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Promote QA → production by opening a PR from peterdrier/Humans:main to nobodies-collective/Humans:main with a properly-qualified commit summary. Use when the user says "PR to production", "promote to prod", "PR from origin to upstream", "prod PR", or any variation of pushing batched fork changes upstream. Always use this skill for the two-remote promotion flow even if the user doesn't say "prod" explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate any URL, interact with elements, verify page state, diff before/after actions, take annotated screenshots, check responsive layouts, test forms and uploads, handle dialogs, and assert element states. ~100ms per command. Use when you need to test a feature, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with evidence. Use when asked to "open in browser", "test the site", "take a screenshot", or "dogfood this". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Import cookies from your real Chromium browser into the headless browse session. Opens an interactive picker UI where you select which cookie domains to import. Use before QA testing authenticated pages. Use when asked to "import cookies", "login to the site", or "authenticate the browser". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to visually interact with a GUI — test buttons, fill forms, verify visual layouts, fuzz web pages, automate user flows, take screenshots, or perform end-to-end QA on any application. Works on cloud VMs, Docker containers, local machines, and sandboxes. Install: pip install cua.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UI runtime 驗證 SKILL — 刷新 Cocos asset-db、執行 validate-ui-specs.js、headless-snapshot-test.js、capture-ui-screens.js，並依環境選用 cocos-screenshot 或 cocos-preview-qa 檢查實際畫面殘差，回寫 generated-review / runtime-verdict。USE FOR: 修改 layout / skin / screen / content / Panel / UI 資產後的驗證收尾。DO NOT USE FOR: 純資產生成、無 target 的整專案大範圍探索。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UI spec 與 Panel scaffold SKILL — 以 normalized recipe、family defaults、content contract 產出或更新 screen package 與 CompositePanel / ChildPanel TypeScript 骨架。USE FOR: 新 screen 從 recipe 落地、既有 screen 做 structure normalization、需要執行 compile-recipe-to-screen-spec.js / compile-recipe-to-panel-scaffold.js。DO NOT USE FOR: 最終視覺 QA、手工 Prefab 微調當正式流程。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent context budget guard and artifact compression workflow. USE FOR: image-heavy QA, compare board review, screenshot batches, large keep/todo/task manifests, long notes handoff, and md/json diff summarization. Trigger this before reading or forwarding heavy artifacts when token growth is a risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UI 資產品質驗證 SKILL — 執行 validate-visual-assets.js、validate-ui-specs.js 與必要的 snapshot regression，對 skin family 資產、screen package、proof draft / family-map 進行全面驗證，並回寫 generated-review。USE FOR: 任何 UI 資產生成後、在 ui-preview-judge 前必須先通過的 QA 關卡。DO NOT USE FOR: debug runtime 崩潰（用 cocos-log-reader）、Layout 佈局調整（用 ui-vibe-pipeline）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UI brief 生成 SKILL — 從 docs/keep.summary.md、正式規格書、task shard、cross-reference-index 與參考圖整理成可執行的 UI brief 或 task-ready brief。USE FOR: 新 UI 畫面開工前、既有畫面補 task shard 欄位、需要收斂 family / proof / normalized recipe / content_contract / smoke_route。DO NOT USE FOR: 直接修改 ui-spec JSON、直接做視覺 QA。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BROWSER VFX ACCEPTANCE SKILL — Use built-in browser/headless browser to automatically verify Cocos VFX block effects and composed VFX recipes in BattleScene preview (`http://localhost:7456`, `previewMode=true`, `previewTarget=5`). USE FOR: VFX health audit, per-block smoke validation, combo recipe regression checks before merging `vfx-block-registry.ts` / `vfx-effects.json`. DO NOT USE FOR: Cocos Editor window screenshot capture, compile-error debugging, or pure log-only diagnosis without browser preview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UI 資產委託導演 SKILL — 讀取 family-map 與 skin-family-*.json，產生 asset-task-manifest / param-tune-manifest 與精確 ArtRecipe，列出每個 family slot 所需的 spriteFrame 路徑、尺寸規格、9-slice 邊距。USE FOR: family-architect 輸出 asset-pending 狀態後，正式產出 UCUF partial asset 任務。DO NOT USE FOR: 非 UI 資產生成、程式邏輯開發、QA 驗證（用 ui-asset-qc）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a built frontend against its chosen direction, catch drift back to generic AI defaults, enforce state coverage, ethical patterns, UX heuristics, and polish, and check contrast with APCA (not the legacy WCAG ratio). Produces specific, prioritized fixes — never vibes-based feedback. Works with pasted screenshots or Playwright MCP automated capture. Load when the user asks to review a UI, audit a design, check if a frontend looks generic or vibecoded, evaluate visual quality or polish, says "review this UI", "is this design good", "audit my frontend", "does this feel like [product]", "design QA", or when frontend-design routes here. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate an approved experiment spec into a launch runbook — platform binding (PostHog primary), feature flag setup, assignment unit, exposure event definition, instrumentation QA, dashboard wiring, ramp plan, monitoring, and rollback procedure. Platform-agnostic core with one strong PostHog adapter shipped; GrowthBook, Statsig, LaunchDarkly, Optimizely, and Eppo documented as a single mapping table the user adapts. Load when a spec is approved and ready to launch, or when the user says "set up the experiment", "wire this up in PostHog", "implement the test", "create the runbook", "launch checklist for this test", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a code change end-to-end in the current worktree: identify what changed, run the relevant tests, get the app running, drive a browser over the affected areas, and report a verdict with screenshots. Generic across project types (Laravel/Herd, Node/bun, frontend, CLI, library). Use when the user wants to verify/QA/smoke-test a change, check that a PR or branch works, validate uncommitted work, or says "/flow", "verify this change", "does this PR work", "test and click through this". Optional target: PR number/URL, branch/ref, or worktree path; default is the current working changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic exploratory QA testing of web applications — find bugs, capture evidence, and generate structured reports

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate multiple Antigravity skills through guided workflows for SaaS MVP delivery, security audits, AI agent builds, and browser QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calls m6A peaks from MeRIP-seq / m6A-seq paired IP-vs-input data using exomePeak2 (transcript-aware, GC-bias-corrected Poisson GLM; Liu 2022 *NAR Genom Bioinform* 4:lqac046), MeTPeak (HMM over sliding windows; Cui 2016 *Bioinformatics* 32:i378), MACS3 / MACS2 with --nomodel --broad --keep-dup all (genome-wide broad alternative), and DRACH motif enrichment confirmation via HOMER or ggseqlogo as a sanity check (NOT a filter). Covers BED12 vs narrowPeak output formats, exonic vs intronic peak handling, multi-tool reconciliation (intersection vs union; cross-caller IDR-equivalent), the m6A-vs-m6Am ambiguity at 5'UTR peaks that antibody-based methods cannot resolve, and orthogonal-validation routes (miCLIP / GLORI / m6A-SAC-seq / m6Anet). Use when calling peaks from paired IP/input genome BAMs, choosing exomePeak2 (transcript-aware default) vs MACS3 (broad genomic) vs MeTPeak (HMM-smoothed low-coverage), confirming DRACH enrichment as a sanity check on the peak set as a whole, reconciling differing peak sets across tools, validating MeRIP peaks against orthogonal single-base methods, interpreting peaks at the 5' end where m6Am contamination is possible, or recommending a multi-tool consensus strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。