「checker」の検索結果

Compatibility alias for the Elixir/Phoenix plugin's N+1 query checker. Invoke explicitly with /ecto:n1-check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews lyrics and prose for AI-written patterns (abstract noun stacking, over-explained metaphors, cliche escalation, missing idiosyncrasy, prose AI tells). Advisory Warning/Info severity — flags issues, does not block or rewrite. Use when reviewing lyrics for authenticity or before generation to catch AI-sounding language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans lyrics for phrases that may match existing songs using web search and LLM knowledge. Use before release to check for unintentional borrowing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans lyrics for explicit content and verifies that explicit flags match actual content. Use before Suno generation or release to ensure accurate content ratings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate exactly one finished CRT retro computer-interface illustration from an uploaded portrait, group photo, creature, object, or described theme. Use when the user wants anchored subjects re-authored as an exaggerated circa-1980s bitmap editorial caricature beneath early Macintosh or Minitel-style windows, optionally invoking the exact Chinese presets 街头怪诞, 巨像符号, or 冷面几何. Before generation, collect a named or image-derived palette and aspect ratio through a strict two-stage intake unless supplied. Preserve each intended subject as a distinct identity, one shared pixel lattice, restricted non-skin checkerboard midtones, low-facet geometry, unequal extraction windows, mandatory barrel-curved CRT edges, and the immutable tait-crt-interface-skill title-bar signature. Never trace, auto-pixelate, imitate photographic detail, omit, merge, or duplicate subjects, retry, resize, expose prompts, or ask users to choose a style preset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and rewrite evaluation/numeric claims to ensure they carry minimal protocol context (task + metric + constraint) and avoid underspecified model naming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for wiring a verify-then-fix loop around a code-editing LLM agent. The agent edits → runs lint/test → reads the output → fixes → re-runs, bounded by an iteration cap and an escalation rule. Activates whenever a coder agent has a verifiable success criterion (exit code, type-checker output, failing assertion) and the user wants the agent to converge to "green" on its own. Framework-agnostic — wraps Aider's `--auto-lint`/`--auto-test`, an OpenHands SWE-Bench loop, a manual LangGraph cycle, or Claude Code's bash tool just the same.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify cross-component wiring and data flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect documentation drift against filesystem state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check a mathematical-modeling paper's in-text citations, bibliography, appendix length and content, code, supporting files, reproducibility, consistency, and anonymity. Use when the user provides a paper or related materials and wants one consolidated P0-P3 audit; do not generate or invent missing sources or programs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the model establishment, numerical solution, result analysis, model validation, and sensitivity or robustness sections of a mathematical-modeling paper against the complete problem. Use for core-model-section diagnosis, not automatic full-paper scoring or unsupported recomputation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a mathematical-modeling paper's model-assumption section against the complete problem statement. Diagnose whether each assumption is necessary, evidence-based, compatible with the task, appropriately simplified, and usable by the later model. Use for assumption review, not automatic full-paper review or unsupported assumption generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a complete mathematical-modeling competition paper with an atomic checklist covering abstract readability, page structure, typography, headings, pagination, figures, tables, equations, anonymity, metadata, visual balance, and page allocation. Return the review in chat or Markdown by default, and provide the bundled single-sheet checklist when the user requests a reusable form. Use when the user provides a PDF or Word paper and asks for a full-paper format and writing-compliance audit; do not replace technical model correctness review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Chinese mathematical-modeling problem-analysis section against the original problem, checking task classification, data reasoning, cross-problem linkage, model-choice rationale, validation planning, chapter boundaries, and the overall solution framework. Use for diagnosis, not automatic full rewriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the symbol-notation section of a mathematical-modeling paper against the full paper. Check table coverage, symbol meanings, units, overloading, case and subscript consistency, first-use definitions, formula usage, and visible table formatting. Use for symbol-table diagnosis, not general paper review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a user-provided Chinese mathematical-modeling abstract without requiring the problem statement or full paper, identify concrete writing defects, and prioritize revisions. Use when the user asks to check, diagnose, or improve a modeling-paper abstract; do not claim coverage or factual consistency that cannot be verified without the problem or paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review mathematical modeling competition papers from a complete problem and paper, with an optional strict bzd-paper-format-checker audit, itemized problem-specific scoring, a bottom-up low-score safeguard, and CUMCM award calibration by problem type, division, region, school and advisor. Generate a Chinese HTML judge report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate consistency across SEED Design component documentation layers (design guidelines in ./docs/content/docs/components, Rootage specs in ./packages/rootage/components, and React docs in ./docs/content/react/components). Use when auditing documentation completeness, before releases, or validating new component docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially fact-check DOCS.md files against the actual source code, verifying every concrete claim rather than trusting structure checks. Use when the user asks to audit docs, verify documentation accuracy, check whether docs are still true, or on a scheduled documentation review. This is the semantic layer the mechanical checkers cannot cover.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check BIM model consistency: naming conventions, parameter completeness, spatial relationships, and data integrity across model elements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check BIM data against IDS (Information Delivery Specification). Validate model information requirements and compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check data compliance with construction standards. Validate data against ISO 19650, IFC, COBie, UniFormat standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated safety compliance verification for construction sites. Check PPE usage, zone access, working at heights regulations, and generate compliance reports using rule-based and ML approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

記事内の事実主張（数値、日付、固有名詞、統計）を自動抽出し、Web検索で裏付け確認するスキル。 「ファクトチェックして」「事実確認して」「裏付けを取って」等のリクエストで発動。 信頼度スコア付きレポートを出力。