662 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use this skill for Obsidian-native formatting and derived artifacts such as Markdown formatting, wikilinks, registry tables, canvas files, optional Bases, CLI operations, and link repair. This skill does not decide knowledge routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a QwenPaw-backed Worker needs to decide whether to do work directly, use native subagents for internal parallelism, or create a temporary QwenPaw agent with a custom AGENTS.md and skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for TeamHarness message delivery details after a flow has decided a message must be sent: current-session reply, NO_REPLY, cross-room/cross-channel message tool payloads, PROJECT_REQUESTED task-room handoff, and requester replyRoute reports. Do not use to choose work mode, create rooms, delegate, check, or accept tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The complete file-by-file source-of-truth hierarchy for Squad: which files are authoritative, which are derived/append-only, who may write each one, who may read each one, and the precedence rules when they conflict. Squad coordinator loads this on demand when it needs to resolve a write conflict, decide where a piece of state belongs, or answer a 'who owns this file' question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add or extend account, managed-site or check-in integrations, improve native editors or compare their UX, or decide site-type boundaries. Uses scoped capability and workflow checks; not isolated bug fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Records an architecture decision as a Nygard/MADR-shaped ADR under decisions/ — capturing the context that forced the choice, the options weighed, the decision itself, and its consequences in both directions, plus the supersedes chain that keeps a decision log honest. Read when asked to record an architecture decision, write an ADR, log the decision we made, document why we chose X over Y, capture this decision for the record, or supersede an old decision with a new one. Do NOT read to frame a proposal or explore an idea not yet decided (frame-a-proposal), to write a spec or implementation plan (write-a-spec), to write an incident postmortem (write-a-postmortem), or to judge whether a design is sound (review-a-design). This skill records a decision already made; it does not make one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a blameless incident postmortem under postmortems/ following the Google SRE shape — evidence-based timeline, trigger vs root cause vs symptom, contributing factors, what went well, and owned+dated+verifiable action items. Read when asked to write a postmortem, do an incident review, run a root cause analysis, write up the outage, retro on the outage, or when the user says we had an incident and wants it documented. Do NOT read to frame a proposal (use frame-a-proposal), write a spec (use write-a-spec), record a decision (use record-a-decision), or review a design (use review-a-design) — a postmortem documents an incident that already happened, it does not propose, specify, decide, or critique future work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
集中兵力：多件事同时争抢时间、注意力或预算时，列出全部待办，选定唯一主攻目标并公开锁定，彻底解决、验证后再转向下一个。当待办过多、推进分散、"每件都做了一点但都没做完"、需要决定先做什么时触发；只有一个任务、任务彼此独立可并行、用户明确要求同时推进时不触发。 English: Concentrate forces. When several tasks compete for time, attention, or budget, enumerate them, lock onto a single main target, finish and verify it completely, then move on. Trigger when priorities sprawl, effort is scattered, or you must decide what to do first; skip when there is one task, tasks are independent and parallel, or the user explicitly wants them advanced together.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CVE validation domain card. Use after CVE lookup has produced applicable or candidate CVEs and red-team mode needs scoped evidence to decide whether to continue, pivot, or report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent guide for operating Sequenzy. Use when Codex needs to authenticate, inspect identity, manage subscribers, create or edit campaigns/sequences/templates, generate draft email content, send a transactional email, read delivery stats, or decide whether a requested Sequenzy workflow is currently supported. Prefer the CLI when it is implemented, and fall back to the dashboard or direct API use when the current CLI surface is only partial.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check whether a website's robots.txt allows the AI crawlers that decide visibility in ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot. Use when someone asks whether AI bots are blocked, whether to allow or block GPTBot, why a site never appears in AI answers, or wants a robots.txt review for AI crawlers. Reads only robots.txt, then returns a per-agent allow/block table, the exact rule responsible for each verdict, and the precise lines to change. Distinguishes training crawlers from the search crawlers that actually control citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Shipping a versioned release -- tag it, stage it behind a canary, or roll back the last deploy: decide what goes in, the version, the rollout stages, and a rollback with its trigger and exact command before it is needed. Use when the user says: release-cut, release cut, cut a release, cut the release, cut a new release, tag a release, tag the release, release candidate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Fine-tuning a model on your own data -- SFT, DPO, RLVR or a LoRA adapter: decide first whether prompting or retrieval already closes the gap, choose the method from the data you have, and promote a checkpoint only when it beats the untuned baseline on a held-out eval. Use when the user says: model-finetuning, model finetuning, model fine-tuning, fine-tune a model, fine-tune the model, fine tune a model, fine tune the model, fine-tune.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] PRD or roadmap priorities to decide: turn product evidence into a decision-ready PRD, prioritization frame, and roadmap brief. Use when the user says: product requirements document, PRD, roadmap prioritization, 제품 요구사항 문서, 제품 기획서, 로드맵 우선순위.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Undecided OMH route handed to Jev: Jev route pick: answer an OMH route question about which workflow fits, recorded without re-routing. Use when the user says: jev-route, ask jev which workflow, jev pick the workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Team or business decision between options: tradeoffs, a recommendation, and a decision note you can act on. Use when the user says: strategy-brief, strategy brief, strategy memo, product strategy, strategic options, decision note, leadership strategy, next strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Comet must decide whether a bounded semantic review packet contains a personal memory worth creating, updating, forgetting, or skipping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," or "content planning." For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate account-level drawdown circuit breaker rules from trader-memory-core state and decide whether new trade risk is allowed today. Uses realized P&L, losing-streak cooldowns, and weekly/monthly drawdown limits without any external API.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "run my launch day", "build a launch day runbook / war room", or "decide CONTINUE or ROLLBACK after the push"; produces a pre-conditions gate check (launch-readiness-auditor SHIP verdict + the authoritative date in launch-registry — missing either stops the skill), a dated hour-blocked runbook with owners (morning irreversible pushes, daytime monitoring loop, evening consolidation), a forced observation-window verdict after every irreversible action against pre-declared kill criteria, a P0-P3 incident ladder with rollback playbooks, and T-0 status lines for the registry proposal protocol. Not for channel submission content and platform rules — use community-launch-runner; not for media replies — use press-media-relations. 发布日runbook/作战室/观察窗/回滚裁决/发布日指挥
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "run a launch retro / post-mortem", "compare launch results vs targets by channel", or "decide what to keep or kill for the next launch"; produces a structured D1/W1/M1 retrospective — a per-channel actual-vs-target table (UTM-attributed own analytics as the truth column, platform self-reported numbers as reference, every figure labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated), a 5-Whys chain on the single largest miss, keep / kill / change decisions per channel, 3-5 actionable learnings for the next launch, and an outcome snapshot submitted to the launch registry. Not for return math (CPA / ROI) — use roi-calculator; not for the stakeholder-facing report writeup — use report-generator; not for a metric deep-dive — use performance-analyzer. 发布复盘/渠道归因/5-Whys/keep-kill
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "amplify influencer content with paid media", "set up whitelisting or Spark Ads", "decide which posts to boost", "repurpose influencer content", "turn one video into multiple ads", or "build a UGC asset library"; produces (paid mode) a content-selection scorecard, a paid amplification strategy (whitelisting/boosting/dark posts), audience targeting, and a budget+optimization plan, or (repurpose mode) a rights-tracked content inventory, a 1-video-to-10+-asset repurposing map, per-format transformation specs, and a 30-day distribution plan. Not for gating whether a deliverable is publishable or FTC-compliant — use creator-content-auditor; not for the always-on brand posting calendar — use social-calendar-builder; not for drafting a net-new idea into platform-native packages — use social-creative-builder. 复用达人内容 / 内容放量.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。