「outcome」の検索結果

Use when planning product experiments, writing testable hypotheses, estimating sample size, prioritizing tests, or interpreting A/B outcomes with practical statistical rigor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 2 of building a Claude Managed Agent — turn a validated build sheet into exact API payloads and a resumable BYOK curl launch script, then launch (environment → agent → session → kickoff) using the founder's OWN Anthropic key. Use when the user says "launch it", "deploy the agent", "create the agent now", or when the orchestrator routes phase=stage-launch. payload_generator.py emits the four ordered payloads; launch_script_writer.py writes launch.sh that reads $ANTHROPIC_API_KEY at runtime and never embeds it; payload_validator.py runs a pre-launch check including an API-key-leak scan. No tool in this skill makes network calls — the user runs launch.sh themselves. Distinct from interview (planning) and grade-iterate (the outcome loop).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 4 of building a Claude Managed Agent — make it run without you. Turn a graded agent into a recurring scheduled deployment (POSIX-cron), an event-driven curl trigger, or confirmed on-demand use, then finalize the versioned roadmap. Use when the user says "run it every morning", "put it on a schedule", "nightly", "weekly", "automate this", "make it recurring", or when the orchestrator routes phase=run-without-you. deployment_builder.py builds the POST /v1/deployments payload (initial_events must include user.message; optionally nests a user.define_outcome so each firing self-grades); cron_validator.py validates the 5-field cron + IANA timezone and prints the wall-clock DST note; next_directions_writer.py writes NEXT-DIRECTIONS.md. No tool makes API calls — the deployment is created via BYOK curl. Distinct from grade-iterate (the in-session loop) and wrap-up (closeout).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close out a launched Claude Managed Agent — recap every primitive the founder now owns, regenerate the single-file overview page, and suggest the next 1-2 upgrades. Use when the user says "wrap up", "close this out", "what do I own now", "give me the summary", "recap the agent", or when the orchestrator routes phase=wrap-up. primitives_inventory.py tables everything owned (agent, environment, session, memory, outcome, deployment); overview_page.py regenerates a self-contained ./my-agent/agent-overview.html; upgrade_suggester.py ranks the next moves from recorded deferrals plus standing hardening steps. Companion to run-without-you; the last stop before phase=done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, and design repeatable AI-agent loops with explicit triggers, actions, verification, stopping conditions, guardrails, and handoffs. Use when a user asks to analyze a codebase for potential loops, mine coding-thread history for work done more than once, turn repeated engineering work into a loop, find or recommend a published loop, create a recurring agent workflow or automation cadence, turn an outcome into a bounded copy-ready loop, or review an existing loop for weak checks, unsafe authority, unbounded repetition, stale state, or unclear stopping behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help the user define a concrete, measurable goal before starting work, especially when they ask to use the goal tool, create a goal, set an objective, clarify success criteria, or turn a fuzzy intention into a quantitative outcome. Use this skill for goal creation and goal refinement only; it does not manage durable snapshots, decision logs, or long-running execution artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create job stories using the 'When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]' format with detailed acceptance criteria. Use when writing job stories, creating JTBD-style backlog items, or expressing user situations and motivations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create comprehensive test scenarios from user stories with test objectives, starting conditions, user roles, step-by-step actions, and expected outcomes. Use when writing QA test cases, creating test plans, defining acceptance tests, or preparing for feature validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) to structure product discovery — map a desired outcome to opportunities, solutions, and experiments. Based on Teresa Torres' Continuous Discovery Habits. Use when structuring discovery work, mapping opportunities to solutions, or deciding what to build next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize one project against its stated milestones using recent work and verified outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct a daily or weekly worklog from observed activity and outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly win-loss analysis for HubSpot closed deals. Reads deals closed-won and closed-lost in the trailing {{lookback_days}}-day window, breaks outcomes down by segment, competitor, price, and the stage lost deals die in, clusters close reasons into themes, and posts themes plus recommendations to {{alert_channel}}. Read-only and report-only — never writes to a HubSpot deal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when writing, enhancing, or evaluating the launch prompt for a long-running autonomous agent or a parallel multi-agent orchestration attacking a hard problem: pseudo-formal task briefs that define terms and an exact success predicate linguistically, enumerate non-counting outcomes, set persistence rules with explicit stop and return conditions and effort floors, manage a diverse portfolio of parallel approaches with an approach registry and blocked-route bookkeeping, and gate the return on adversarial audit. Route agent topology and coordination protocols to multi-agent-patterns, runtime control surfaces and loop governance to harness-engineering, evaluator and quality-gate construction to evaluation, judge design to advanced-evaluation, and compaction or memory mechanics to context-compression and memory-systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when building agent evaluation systems: deterministic checks, regression suites, multi-dimensional rubrics, quality gates, production monitoring, baseline comparison, and outcome measurement for agent pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Emit the complete Resolve handoff with exact modes, outcomes, test evidence, and publication state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run and verify ClawHub production deploys and stable ClawHub CLI npm releases. Use when deploying backend or frontend changes to clawhub.ai, dispatching the Deploy workflow, publishing a stable CLI tag, checking release prerequisites, or proving the exact production SHA and workflow outcome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mandatory design-brief gate for clarifying the product and outcome. Use before ideation, image-to-code builds, redesigns, or product UI work to clarify missing product information and play back the brief before proceeding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when converting PM intake into a slice SPEC.md with observable acceptance outcomes, explicit scope, and advisory sibling build dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a long-running agent may have lost the product outcome, when context was compacted, when work has crossed a major boundary, or when a fresh path-based trace is needed before the next consequential action. Not for fresh-session orientation, waking an idle seat, or checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate an AI product idea across outcomes, hypotheses, risks, and positioning. Use when deciding whether an AI solution deserves investment or recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create user stories with Mike Cohn format and Gherkin acceptance criteria. Use when turning user needs into development-ready work with clear outcomes and testable conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frame an epic as a testable hypothesis with target user, expected outcome, and validation method. Use when defining a major initiative before roadmap, discovery, or delivery planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an Opportunity Solution Tree from outcomes to opportunities, solutions, and tests. Use when a stakeholder request needs problem framing before you decide what to build.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。