「sel」の検索結果

Build editorial/magazine/report webpages on a GENUINE Müller-Brockmann modular grid (International Typographic Style). Encodes the discipline (columns + modules + baseline, grotesque type, flush-left, restrained black/white/red palette) AND the front-end engineering to make the grid real, visible, and verified: one CSS-variable source of truth, an interactive grid-toggle overlay, subgrid bands, 8px baseline lock, and runtime optical alignment. Triggers: "magazine spread", "grid system", "Swiss design", "editorial layout", "show the grid", "align everything to the grid".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The meta-framework for how a company runs — the connective tissue between all C-suite roles. Covers operating system selection (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native, hybrid), accountability charts, scorecards, meeting pulse, issue resolution, and 90-day rocks. Use when setting up company operations, selecting a management framework, designing meeting rhythms, building accountability systems, implementing OKRs, or when user mentions EOS, Scaling Up, operating system, L10 meetings, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, or quarterly planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review+fix protocol with optional pre-core git diff review and safety guardrails (unsoundness, invariants, footguns, incidental complexity). Use when prompts say "/tw-fix this PR", "fix current branch", "fix this diff", "repair CI red", or "apply a minimal patch", and when crash/corruption/invariant-break issues need correction with a validation signal. Stop only after self-review exhausts actionable changes, each full cycle reaches post-self-review rerun plus terminal diff-review closure, and two consecutive zero-edit full cycles are clean.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

7 層構造プロンプトを生成・更新するとき、owner_agent 向けに Prompt Templates/Self-Evaluation を充填するときに使う。

Use when implementation needs isolation from the current workspace; creates git worktrees with safe directory selection and baseline verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite website image-to-code skill for Codex. For visually important web tasks, it must first generate the design image(s) itself, deeply analyze them, then implement the website to match them as closely as possible. In Codex, it must prefer large, readable, section-specific images instead of tiny compressed boards, generate fresh standalone images for sections or detail views instead of cropping old ones, avoid lazy under-generation, avoid cards-inside-cards-inside-cards UI, and keep the hero clean, spacious, readable, and visible on a small laptop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after completing any non-trivial task. The agent self-rates its output on 5 axes — accuracy, completeness, clarity, actionability, conciseness — with concrete evidence per criterion. Produces a structured 1-5 scorecard with specific improvement suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a live page for accessibility issues, locate each WCAG violation precisely, and return a selector-grounded fix worklist without editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Track aircraft and vessels from public ADS-B and AIS broadcasts using ADS-B Exchange, Flightradar24, FlightAware,… Use when following a tail number or flight, looking up an ICAO 24-bit hex code, registration or callsign, tracing a ship by IMO number or MMSI, checking a flag of convenience or port-call history, finding who owns a private jet or vessel

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Start-here router and tradecraft baseline for any investigation into a person, company, domain, image or selector.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sell layer: raise the framing of an artifact to the scale it actually deserves without touching a single number. Use before anything goes outbound (post, pitch, README, CV, PR comment, landing page, application, DM) or before showing a finished artifact. Triggers: /fake-it, /fi, sell it, make it louder, strengthen the frame.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide-as-cofounder mode: the owner hands over the decision itself, so the agent does not ask back, does not offer a menu of options and does not wait, but picks, acts and reports the call with its reasoning. Triggers: /decide, /ds, decide yourself, your call, up to you, you know better, do as you see fit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use native Worktrunk commands for explicit Git worktree operations when requested. Distinguish repository selection from worktree selection, and inspect command help before changing configuration or hooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate strategic-consultant-grade meeting minutes from transcripts or notes in Japanese OR English (matching the source language), then run a self-review loop (max 3 iterations) that checks for internal contradictions, action-item omissions, speaker-name errors, and date/day-of-week mistakes before reporting completion. Use this skill whenever the user asks to draft meeting minutes, summarize a transcript, or document a meeting discussion — including Japanese-language transcripts (議事録 / 会議メモ / 文字起こし) and English-language transcripts.

工程ごとの完了判定、品質ゲート、証跡、標準検証コマンド、例外運用を設計するスキル。 実装完了・テスト実施・品質確認完了・出荷可能を分離し、再利用可能な gate matrix を作る。 「全OK」「完了」などの曖昧な完了表現を排除し、証跡に基づく退出条件を定義する。 Use when defining Definition of Done, quality gates, exit criteria, release readiness gates, evidence requirements, exception handling, or standardized verification commands. Covers: definition of done, quality gate, exit criteria, release readiness, 完了判定, 品質ゲート. Distinct from project-completeness-scorer (which scores) -- this skill designs the gates and criteria themselves.

MSP（Minimum Sellable Product）をつくるための計画を作成

Audit ClawJS/Clawix code hygiene without editing code, producing categorized findings, baseline status, and validation evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run or change the macOS UX trace harness for action-to-visual-completion latency, scroll stability, fixture pressure, and baseline evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run and interpret Clawix UI geometry, screenshot, protected-surface, and debt-baseline checks without authorizing visual repair.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select a current video model and endpoint against duration, references, motion, audio, ratio, quality, cost, and continuity requirements using live schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesized reference notes from three US Government vehicle-safety sources: NHTSA Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles (updated 2022, final), NHTSA Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety (2017), and a 16-section selection of 49 CFR Part 571 (FMVSS) pinned at eCFR versioner date 2025-01-01. Use for voluntary vehicle cybersecurity practices, the ADS 2.0 twelve priority safety design elements, and FMVSS occupant protection, brakes/stability/lighting, and fuel/EV integrity requirements. Not ISO 26262, not ASPICE, not ISO/SAE 21434, not UNECE R155/R156, not SAE J3016, and not the full Part 571; the FMVSS material is a selection of vehicle-level minimum performance standards, not a process standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the Expanded Guidance for NASA Systems Engineering (NASA/SP-2016-6105-SUPPL, Volume 1, March 2016) — the practitioner-depth supplement to the NASA SE Handbook. Use for the load-bearing mechanics the handbook compresses: the SE Engine's per-phase cadence and the iterative-vs-recursive distinction, the AS9100 crosswalk, life-cycle tailoring vs. customization and the Compliance Matrix, the recursive system-design consistency loop (ConOps vs. Operations Concept, requirement flow/type/ownership, successive refinement), product realization (verify/qualify/accept/certify cardinality, protoflight, 'test the way we fly' coverage, two-form transition), and the crosscutting technical-management procedures (six-step scheduling, cost-estimating method selection, JCL, interface document family, RIDM/CRM, CM baselines, EVM arithmetic, MOE/MOP/KPP/TPM, the three required leading indicators, and the decision-analysis method catalog). This is the DEPTH layer — it deliberately does NOT restate the base definitions; pair it with the nasa-se-handbook pack. Scope: NASA space-flight SE practice (Vol 1 Practices); thin on the Vol 2 process-appendix detail, on non-NASA/commercial life cycles, and on software-engineering methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from MIL-HDBK-61B, the DoD Configuration Management (CM) guidance handbook (7 April 2020, cataloged with Change 1, 2025). Use for defense CM across the acquisition and sustainment life cycle: the five CM functions (planning, identification, control/change management, status accounting, verification & audit), the three configuration baselines (FBL/ABL/PBL) and FCD→ACD→PCD documentation, configuration items (CIs/HWCI/CSCI), change instruments (ECP/NOR/RFV), the CCB and Class I/II classification, CDCA/AA authority, FCA/PCA audits, data management and data rights (CDRL/DID, DFARS rights ladder, master/authoritative source), and tailoring CM by phase (EIA-649-1 R/T/NR matrix, Appendix C templates), plus digital-era CM (digital twin, viewpoints, MOSA). NOTE: 61B is advisory guidance that adopts and points to the SAE EIA-649 / EIA-649-1 / GEIA-HB-649 suite for the authoritative CM requirements — this pack names and describes that suite but does not reproduce its copyrighted requirement text. Thin on: the EIA-649 requirement clauses themselves, form-level detail (DD-form field instructions, full DID content), and non-DoD/commercial CM frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide (GAO-16-89G, 2015). Use for building, assessing, or auditing a program's integrated master schedule (IMS): the ten best practices of a reliable schedule (capture, sequence, resource, duration, traceability, valid critical path, reasonable total float, schedule risk analysis, updating, baseline), the four characteristics (comprehensive, well-constructed, credible, controlled), critical path method arithmetic (forward/backward pass, total float), schedule risk analysis (Monte Carlo, contingency), statusing and baseline control, and the Appendix II audit triad. Scheduling/time-management oriented: it is the authority on schedule reliability, but it is NOT a cost-estimating guide, a full SE process model, an agile guide, or a risk-management framework — see sibling packs (gao-cost, dau-se-guidebook, nasa-schedule, nasa-risk) for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。