1,659 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Create interactive AI role-play training activities as self-contained HTML. Use when the user asks to generate a role-play, persona practice, sales simulation, customer conversation drill, compliance scenario, or any learner-vs-AI-character training exercise.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze data from randomized controlled trials. Use when user mentions: treatment effects, ITT analysis, LATE, TOT, compliance analysis, attrition, balance checks, heterogeneous effects, RCT results, experimental analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design roadside signs and large-format ads for businesses, especially automotive dealers. Use for pylon signs, monument signs, lot banners, highway billboards, digital roadside boards, service-lane signage, used-car event signs, lease or finance campaign concepts, and other driver-at-speed messaging where legibility, offer hierarchy, and dealer ad compliance matter. Activate on "road sign", "billboard", "dealership sign", "car dealer ad", "pylon sign", "monument sign", "service lane signage", "automotive billboard", "roadside ad", "dealer lease offer", or "drive-by signage". NOT for fabrication drawings, permitting or local sign-code review, web or social ad campaigns, or full brand identity systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cryptographic security for agentic systems — zero-trust agent networking, signed message envelopes (JWS/JWE), capability-based security (ocaps), Merkle tree audit trails, WASM sandboxing, and formal verification. Covers CLI dev tool security, mTLS between agents, permission boundaries (least privilege for AI agents), and supply chain security for skills/plugins. Activate on: "agent security", "zero trust agents", "secure agent communication", "capability-based security", "ocap", "signed messages between agents", "agent audit trail", "sandbox agent execution", "agent permissions", "mTLS agents", "cryptographic verification", "agent supply chain", "OWASP agentic", "prove agent did X", "tamper-proof agent logs". NOT for: application-level SAST scanning (use security-auditor), network firewall rules (use infrastructure), SOC2/HIPAA compliance (organizational), or prompt injection defense (use prompt-engineer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive quality control for CLIP-seq libraries (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, PAR-CLIP) covering library complexity (preseq), FRiP, IDR replicate reproducibility, read-distribution metagene, SMInput vs IgG control rationale, rRNA / snoRNA contamination, fragment-length distribution, and ENCODE-compliance thresholds. Use when assessing whether a CLIP library passed, deciding lenient vs stringent peak thresholds, comparing replicates with IDR rescue and self-consistency ratios, or distinguishing failed IP from over-amplified library.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when working with Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) datasets: organizing neuroscience and biomedical data (MRI, EEG, MEG, iEEG, PET, microscopy, NIRS, motion capture, EMG, MR spectroscopy, behavioral), querying BIDS layouts, validating compliance, converting DICOM to BIDS, writing metadata sidecars, or creating BIDS derivatives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suggests using prednisolone 3–5 mg/d orally once or twice daily as a glucocorticoid alternative in primary adrenal insufficiency. Consider this option when evaluating glucocorticoid therapy, particularly in patients with reduced medication compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive AWS security posture assessment using AWS CLI and security best practices
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits and designs iOS/macOS/watchOS/visionOS interfaces against the Apple Human Interface Guidelines, including the Liquid Glass design language (announced WWDC25, shipped with iOS 26/macOS Tahoe, Sept 2025). Use when reviewing an Apple-platform mockup or app for HIG compliance, checking contrast or tap-target sizes, or designing native-feeling Apple UI (e.g., 'audit my iOS app against the HIG', 'is this text readable on Liquid Glass?').
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert human-written CLAUDE.md into AI-native structured-label format. Battle-tested across 4 models. Same rules, fewer tokens, higher compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
/cs:ai-act-readiness <system> — EU AI Act 6-question forcing interrogation. Use during AI-system intake, before EU deployment, or during annual compliance refresh as Article 113 obligations phase in (2025-02-02 / 2025-08-02 / 2026-08-02 / 2027-08-02).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous DevSecOps & FinOps Guardrails. Orchestrates Gemini 3 Flash to audit Linux Kernel patches, Terraform cost drifts, and K8s compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.2 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
General code quality review — project guideline compliance, bug detection, code quality analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
General code quality review — project guideline compliance, bug detection, code quality analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce traceability from natural-language intent to machine predicates, final observables, evidence, and owner-readable acceptance. Use when conducting any audit, review, QA pass, parity or compliance check, security assessment, code or architecture review, visual or behavioral comparison, data validation, system verification, completion gate, or claim that an implementation satisfies a human request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check proposed stack, data flows, cloud choices, and delivery controls against declared enterprise policies, compliance frameworks, and security controls. Trigger at R2/R3 risk classification, before locking architecture decisions, or when the operating profile names a governance pointer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regenerate docs/THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md from provenance/borrows.jsonl after any ledger change — even a single new entry — never hand-edit the notices file
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the offline (jscpd) and online (scanoss-py) similarity scanners on demand against a diff or path — the ONLY home of this repo's detection capability; no CI gate exists or ever ran it automatically
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a diff needs a requirement review — does it satisfy every stated acceptance criterion — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge. Never infers criteria from the diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Paste a URL/snippet before you borrow it — detects its license, runs the derived compatibility policy, and drafts a provenance ledger entry — even before any code is written, not after
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Opquast Digital Quality Framework (245 rules, 14 categories) when building, reviewing, or auditing websites and web applications. Use for web development quality assurance, accessibility compliance, security hardening, privacy implementation, e-commerce best practices, and holistic digital quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Project Management] Use when you need to enforce quality gates, verify compliance with standards, track quality metrics, and generate audit trails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。