2,788 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Map a scoped topic across three coexisting horizons — current system under strain (H1), preferred future (H3), and transition innovations sorted as H2+ or H2- — to understand change dynamics and identify responsible next actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the week using accumulated session evidence — retrieval rates, hint depths, calibration accuracy, transfer and unassisted results. The learner identifies patterns and sets a strategy goal. Use weekly or after a multi-session period.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Present pathway options and orchestrate place-based curriculum design from a local place, curriculum requirement, or community issue. Use when place should become a primary text for learning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinates UDL and differentiation tools through a universal-first hierarchy: barrier removal before targeted differentiation before individualised accommodation. Use when planning accessible learning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define the scope and purpose of a complex inquiry before mapping or futures work begins. Use when a class or group needs to agree what they are investigating, who it matters to, and at what scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a practitioner inquiry cycle from research question through data collection to evidence-informed action. Use when starting action research, teacher-led investigation, or professional inquiry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Select evidence-based study strategies matched to material type, learning goal, and student habits. Use when advising students on revision techniques, homework, or independent study approaches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map a complex topic by placing factors on hexagonal tiles where adjacency signals a claimed relationship. Use when students need to surface hidden connections in a system before analysis or action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and navigate genuine dilemmas in curriculum, school, or community contexts — tensions between competing goods that cannot be solved, only navigated. Produces a structured dilemma map with both poles named and both/and possibilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build students' capacity to compare accounts across multiple historical sources — identifying agreements, contradictions, and gaps. Use when students treat individual documents as complete answers rather than partial perspectives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a critical thinking task targeting specific skills like evaluating evidence, identifying bias, or analysing arguments. Use when embedding critical analysis into subject lessons.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes between five assessment pathways — formative, rubric/criteria, authentic/performance, peer/self, and diagnostic — with validity and equity checks. Use when a teacher needs help choosing how to assess.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build students' capacity to read historical documents closely — attending to word choice, tone, and rhetoric as evidence of perspective. Use when students summarise sources without analysing language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a teacher-drafted central historical question for its capacity to drive genuine historical inquiry. Use when assessing whether a question will generate real evidence-weighing or produce shallow responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a unit using backwards design from desired outcomes through assessment evidence to learning activities. Use when starting a new unit or redesigning an existing one from standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify a game with evidence on its selected target runtime. Launch the actual build and prove real rendering, input, the core loop, at least one designed outcome, restart, and explicit limitations without dressing subjective fun up as a certain verdict. Use for test a generated game, QA a game build, check whether the game is fully playable, or verify the build. 游戏证据化质量验证。在选定的目标运行环境中启动实际构建，证明真实渲染、输入、核心循环、至少一个设计结果、重开和明确限制，不把主观趣味包装成确定性结论。用于测试生成游戏、检查游戏能否完整游玩或验证构建。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a novel into a fully playable game on the selected target platform. Orchestrates the whole adaptation pipeline — requirements intake, gameable deconstruction, concept selection, world and visual design, target-runtime build, and evidence-based QA — for a novel in any language. Use for novel to game, story to game, book to game, adapt this novel into a game, turn this book into a playable prototype, make an interactive story or text adventure from this novel. NovelToGame 总入口。把任意语言的原始小说、拆文库或 oh-story 写作工程转成有原著依据、可在目标平台完整游玩的游戏，编排游戏化拆解、概念选择、游戏与视觉设计、目标运行环境构建和证据化质量验证。用于小说转游戏、把这本书做成游戏、把小说改成互动小说 / 互动叙事 / 文字冒险游戏等需求。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deconstruct a novel for game adaptation. Compress a raw novel, deconstruction library, or writing project into a SOURCE_BIBLE with cited textual evidence, extracting world rules, player verbs, spaces, character will, systems, and visual anchors — without inventing a genre yet. Use for gameable book analysis, analyze a novel for game adaptation, extract game systems from a book. 游戏化拆书。把原始小说、拆文库或写作工程压缩成有必要原文证据的 SOURCE_BIBLE，提取世界规则、玩家动词、空间、角色意志、系统和视觉锚点，不提前发明游戏类型。用于游戏化拆书、分析小说的游戏改编基础等需求。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a risk-matched whitebox or the approved production game for its target runtime. Turn GAME_DESIGN, and ART_DIRECTION when production begins, into a minimal BUILD_BRIEF and a runnable candidate that can be iterated with replayable evidence. Use for prototype the riskiest design question, implement the approved game design, or turn this design into a running game. 游戏构建执行。先按最大风险做白盒，或在正式生产时把批准后的 GAME_DESIGN 与 ART_DIRECTION 压缩成最小 BUILD_BRIEF，在目标运行环境中实现可运行候选并用可回放证据迭代。用于验证高风险设计问题、构建游戏原型或实现批准方案。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score a repository's agentic legibility from repo-visible evidence only. Use when Codex needs to audit how easy a codebase is for coding agents to discover, bootstrap, validate, and navigate, especially for harness-engineering reviews, developer-experience audits, repo cleanup, or before/after comparisons after improving docs, tooling, or architectural constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
algorithm for determining cluster count and membership by stability evidence in unsupervised analysis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query a user's TrailSnap photo library through scoped MCP tools to find photos, reconstruct memories, build person timelines, create evidence-backed narratives, or propose an album plan for explicit in-app approval. Use for the user's own TrailSnap library; never claim a proposal was executed or changed the library.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze the photograph uploaded by the user, deconstruct its visual evidence, abstract and distill the essential relationships, then reconstruct them as a new nonliteral lower-panel composition guided by 19 bundled references. Use for CLEAN upper-photo/lower-abstraction editorial artworks with a number, date, and short phrase in the lower panel. This is abstraction and reconstruction, never style conversion or a miniature redraw. Preserve the exact user-uploaded photograph unchanged above.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Three-mode idea engine - generate collides the week's zeitgeist with what you can ship into scored wedges; validate viability-screens the idea backlog; memo writes evidence-backed startup memos.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。