価値概念スコアの検証を行う時の観点を説明する
「value」の検索結果
1,607 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
価値分析モデルを作る時の観点を説明する
価値デザインモデルを作る時の観点を説明する
価値記述を作る時の観点を説明する
Use when a learner needs a structured review session prioritizing high-value topics by recency, error history, and upcoming deadlines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate a fuzzy analytical question into a rigorous investigation plan. Interrogates the ask, grounds the plan in the available data dictionary, applies analytical best practices, and produces a structured brief of query specifications for a downstream query-writing skill. Plans, does not write SQL. Use when: "why did X drop", "is there a relationship between A and B", "who are our highest-value customers", "what's driving the change in Y", "investigate this trend", "design an analysis for", "scope this analytical question". (narrative-common)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a coverage & quality profile of a Narrative dataset (or access rule): row count, per-column null/fill rate, cardinality, ranges, top-values, inferred column shape, and quality flags. Reads bundled stats + sample first, recovers missing/stale stats by configuring and recalculating them, and escalates to a cheap `/write-nql` query only for a measure no stat can provide. Descriptive, not prescriptive. Use when: "profile dataset N", "what does dataset N look like", "coverage and quality of <dataset>", "what id types does N emit", "null rates / cardinality for <dataset>", "is this dataset's stats fresh". (narrative-common)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a dataset or access rule before it joins an identity-graph build (access rules behave like datasets in NQL here). Enumerates failure modes (hub identifiers, high-degree nodes, suspicious values, over-connected identifiers), tests hypotheses in parallel, quantifies damage by rows / edges / entities, and proposes minimal filters ranked by severity. When issues are found, returns a validated `CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW` NQL the caller can run to produce a graph-ready clean source; if the data passes, says so and recommends it unchanged. Plans and authors the clean-view NQL; does not execute it. Use when: "audit this dataset before the graph build", "find bad edges in <source>", "check identity data quality", "recommend filters for the graph build", "quantify damage from <identifier_type>", "pre-graph DQ". (narrative-identity)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
컬렉션과 그에 붙은 로직(필터·합계·검증)을 전용 클래스로 추출하여 First Class Collection 생성. "일급 컬렉션", "List<Order> 감싸는 클래스", "컬렉션 로직 모아", "/first-class-collection" 요청 시 사용. 단, getter 노출 방지만 필요하면 /encapsulate-collection, 단일 값 타입은 /discover-value-object가 적합. /first-class-collection [commit-ref]로 호출.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
반복되는 파라미터 그룹을 객체로 치환(IPO)하거나, 객체에서 꺼낸 값 대신 객체 자체를 전달(Preserve Whole Object). "파라미터 객체", "인자가 너무 많아", "start·end 대신 Range로", "/introduce-parameter-object" 요청 시 사용. 단, 결과 객체가 검증·연산을 가진 도메인 값이면 /discover-value-object가 적합. /introduce-parameter-object [commit-ref]로 호출.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor Swift code toward declarative functional programming with immutability, value types, pure functions, transformations, and closure-based APIs. Use when asked for functional refactoring or `/refactor:functional`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break an application or feature into thin vertical user-story slices with clear acceptance criteria and user-observable value. Use when planning a backlog, decomposing a feature, writing implementation-ready stories, or turning requirements into deliverable slices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor test files to improve behavioral coverage, clarity, structure, assertions, fixture setup, mocking strategy, and remove implementation-detail or low-value tests. Use when asked to clean up, declutter, consolidate, or improve tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
i-vsd
無料Load when evaluating an Islamic software feature, provider policy, AI behavior, moderation, monetization, privacy, defaults, ranking, self-hosting, or deployment model for provider responsibility and Islamic value-sensitive design; not for generic fiqh rulings or ordinary technical implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load for cross-layer refactors, record/class or value-object migrations, new services/interfaces/repositories, project references, dependency-direction failures, or deciding whether code belongs in Domain, Application, Persistence/Infrastructure, API, or Blazor; not for a local edit wholly inside an established layer pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load for EF Core entities/configurations, semantic value persistence, portable constraints, DbContext/query filters, repositories/specifications, migrations, model snapshots, transactions, or seeded lookup tables; use query-optimization specifically for N+1 or slow SQL diagnosis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full type inference philosophy (never cast, never annotate inferred values), Register module declaration, from narrowing on hooks and Link, strict:false for shared components, getRouteApi for code-split typed access, addChildren with object syntax for TS perf, LinkProps and ValidateLinkOptions type utilities, as const satisfies pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA Requirements Engineering Management Handbook (DOT/FAA/AR-08/32). Use for writing requirements for real-time, embedded control systems — the avionics/medical slant — via the Handbook's eleven recommended practices: system overview and boundary (monitored/controlled variables), operational concepts (use cases), environmental assumptions, change-tolerant functional architecture (dependency diagrams), safety-driven architecture revision (FHA/PSSA/fault tree), system modes, detailed behavior and performance requirements (ideal value + tolerance + latency), the four-variable model bridge to software requirements (MON/CON/NAT/REQ, IN'/REQ'/OUT', DO-178B mapping), subsystem allocation, and rationale. Carries the Isolette Thermostat and Flight Control System worked examples. Slanted toward control systems with sensors and actuators; thin on information-system / enterprise / agile requirements, on requirements-management tooling, and on the formal-methods internals of SCR/RSML/SpecTRM (it names them, does not re-teach them). Does not reproduce the IEEE/DO-178B/ARP standards it cites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
gao-cost
無料Knowledge base from the GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide (GAO-20-195G). Use for program cost estimating: the four characteristics of a reliable estimate (comprehensive, well documented, accurate, credible) and the 18 best practices; the 12-step cost estimating process (purpose, plan, technical baseline, WBS, ground rules and assumptions, data, point estimate, sensitivity, risk/uncertainty, document, present, update); estimating methods (analogy, parametric, engineering build-up, learning curves); Monte Carlo risk/uncertainty analysis, confidence levels and contingency; auditing and validating an estimate against the characteristics; earned value management (EIA-748, BCWS/BCWP/ACWP, CPI/SPI/TCPI, EAC, PMB, IBR); and specialized techniques (software cost estimating, learning curves, Analysis of Alternatives, WBS templates, the Green Book internal-control framework). This is the cost-estimating companion to the GAO Schedule and Technology Readiness Assessment guides. Does not cover schedule estimating/risk in depth (see the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide), agency-specific cost models, or the full text of referenced standards (EIA-748, MIL-STD-881D, the Green Book) — these are named, not reproduced.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Use for AI system classification (high-risk vs prohibited vs general), conformity assessment procedures, GPAI model obligations, transparency and disclosure requirements, governance structure (AI Office / AI Board), penalty tiers, value-chain operator obligations, post-market monitoring, and Annex III use-case analysis. Does not cover EU liability rules for AI (separate proposed directive) or implementation guidance documents issued after July 2024.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
针对抑郁症的行为激活疗法:打破恶性循环、活动监测、周计划制定及基于价值观的活动选择。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Activación conductual para la depresión: romper el círculo vicioso, registro de actividades, planificación semanal y actividades basadas en valores.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Поведенческая активация при депрессии: разорвать порочный круг, мониторинг активности, планирование недели и действия на основе ценностей.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Терапия принятия и ответственности (ACT) Стивенса Хейса: модель Гексафлекс с шестью ключевыми процессами психологической гибкости.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。