「verification」の検索結果

Run Phase 1c (spec review gate) for the active VCSDD feature. Spawns a fresh vcsdd-adversary instance to review the behavioral spec and verification architecture. Records PASS/FAIL gate verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need Liberty91 platform intelligence — what actually happened (deduplicated Threat Events with every source, Admiralty reliability/credibility and verification stage), whether an IOC is already known to your account, the canonical threat library (actors, malware, vulnerabilities, clusters, ATT&CK TTPs), alert matches, or which of your customer organizations an occurrence affects — or when you need to push intelligence back: ingesting your own report, generating an intelligence package, or uploading an organization document. Also supplies event provenance fields, when the platform returns them, and Threat Library alias resolution to /source-provenance and /quality-of-information-check. Two-way, first-party integration. Commonly invoked by /ip-investigation and friends, /ioc-enrichment-workflow, /threat-actor-profiling, /campaign-tracking and /vulnerability-intelligence. Reads $LIBERTY91_API_KEY.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria. Use when implementing features, refactoring, or any multi-step work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production deployment principles and decision-making. Safe deployment workflows, rollback strategies, and verification. Teaches thinking, not scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement authentication and authorization with Better Auth - a framework-agnostic TypeScript authentication framework. Features include email/password authentication with verification, OAuth providers (Google, GitHub, Discord, etc.), two-factor authentication (TOTP, SMS), passkeys/WebAuthn support, session management, role-based access control (RBAC), rate limiting, and database adapters. Use when adding authentication to applications, implementing OAuth flows, setting up 2FA/MFA, managing user sessions, configuring authorization rules, or building secure authentication systems for web applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user asks for an HTML-first visual design deliverable or design judgment: interactive prototype, slide deck, motion demo, infographic, dashboard, landing page, whitepaper, changelog, business card, social cover, brand system, design critique, multi-variant exploration, or export to MP4, GIF, PPTX, PDF, or SVG. It is optimized to make AI agents do the routing, template selection, verification, and export prep so humans spend less time prompt-engineering. Do not use for production web apps, SEO sites, backend systems, or pure copy edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MATLAB R2026a testing, validation, and CI workflow for matlab.unittest, MATLAB Test, Simulink Test, coverage, artifact generation, GitHub Actions, and open-source reproducibility. Use whenever MATLAB work needs verification, regression tests, CI, GitHub publication, or acceptance criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assume the role of Galyarder CTO (Chief Technology Officer). Technical guardian. Enforce technical integrity, architectural determinism, self-healing formal verification, and planetary computational leverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when recovery planning requires verification that backups are restorable, complete, and safe to trust before an incident or recovery event.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate a full Galyarder Framework release across engineering verification, npm, GitHub, smoke testing, and announcement follow-up. Use when leadership asks to ship a release, not merely to discuss versioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synchronize curated Agent Skills across approved repositories with policy checks and verification. Use when publishing or updating managed skills, validating a repository mirror, or selecting a safe sync scope. Triggers on "sync public skills", "publish skills", "public 公開", "skill sync", "repository mirror".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduce repeated permission prompts across Microsoft Scout, Copilot CLI, and host tool confirmations with user-approved settings and explicit before/after verification. Use when users ask for permission max, fewer approval prompts, shell allow-list expansion, autoApprove, or diagnosis of repeated Read/Write/PowerShell confirmations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

houtu-dependencies enterprise-grade Spring Cloud microservice foundational framework complete usage guide. GroupId is io.github.lujiafa, covering unified response, exception handling, parameter parsing, session authentication, permission control, signature verification, anti-replay, distributed lock, rate limiting, database field encryption, config decryption, access logging, canary routing, weighted load balancing, Feign enhancement, Sentinel circuit breaking, service discovery, Swagger documentation, crypto utilities, HTTP client, monitoring metrics, and other enterprise-grade capabilities. When the project build file (pom.xml or build.gradle/build.gradle.kts) contains io.github.lujiafa or houtu-related dependencies, or when the user mentions houtu or houtu-dependencies, this Skill must be read and code must be generated strictly following framework conventions. Even if the user is simply doing regular Spring Boot development (e.g., writing Controller, Service, Feign), as long as the project includes houtu, the houtu approach must be used instead of native Spring. When the user explicitly wants to use the houtu framework and the project has not yet included it, proactively add the BOM and required Starters; when the project already includes it, proactively identify and import required module dependencies based on business scenarios during coding, naturally integrating framework capabilities to enhance business services based on business semantics, rather than waiting for the user to specify each one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-deployment verification checklist. Use when about to ship a release, deploying a change with database migrations or feature flags, verifying CI status and approvals before going to production, or documenting rollback triggers ahead of time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-merge deployment workflow covering feature flags, canary/blue-green rollout, smoke-test verification, and rollback triggers. Use after a PR is merged and you need to ship it safely to production. Trigger on "deploy", "roll out", "canary", "feature flag", "rollback".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run security verification — SAST pattern scanning, DAST against a running app, OWASP Top 10 compliance, CVSS assessment, and adversarial code audit. Use before commit/push or when checking code for vulnerabilities. Trigger on "security scan", "is this vulnerable", "OWASP check", "security verify", "scan for vulnerabilities".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Forge's canonical verification chain (format:check + lint + typecheck + build + test). Use before claiming any task done or opening a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Forge's canonical verification chain (format:check + lint + typecheck + build + test). Use before claiming any task complete or opening a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the full Forge verification suite (format:check + lint + typecheck + build + test). Use this before claiming any task complete or before opening a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing or improving a user-facing app workflow. Guides product-grade UX, frontend, backend/API behavior, AI/provider or long-running task states, tests, and end-to-end verification from rough requirements to a shippable feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。