382 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Spawn three parallel review subagents over the active transcript, surface learnings, and route each to a concrete edit on an existing skill. Use when the user says reflect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Teaches how to reason from a transaction protocol’s rules to a working model. Use when analyzing a concurrency-control paper, spec, or algorithm to identify state, metadata, invariants, operation rules, examples, counterexamples, guarantees, false aborts, unsafe commits, or tradeoffs before inspecting concrete traces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns product or tech specs into concrete Notion tasks that Claude code can implement. Breaks down spec pages into detailed implementation plans with clear tasks, acceptance criteria, and progress tracking to guide development from requirements to completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spawn three parallel review subagents over the active transcript, surface learnings, and route each to a concrete edit on an existing skill. Use when the user says reflect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn student course evaluations (free-text + numeric) into an actionable teaching-improvement plan — the teaching analogue of /respond-to-referees. Clusters comments into themes, separates signal from noise, classifies each theme Keep / Change / Investigate / Out-of-scope, and drafts concrete changes mapped to the syllabus and slide decks. Use when user says "respond to my evals", "what do these course evaluations tell me", "turn my teaching feedback into a plan", or after a semester's evals arrive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive adversarial audit of a theory, proof, math/econ paper, codebase, or set of claims — decompose into components, fan out independent skeptics that must return CONCRETE defects, adjudicate every finding with a separate judge, fix all confirmed defects, then re-verify. Use when correctness must be bulletproof and single-pass or round-by-round review is too slow and too shallow. Invoke for "audit this rigorously", "find ALL the bugs/gaps", "make this rock solid", "converge faster on correctness".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before committing to a plan or launch, assume it already failed and reason backward through concrete causes — convert failure paths into mitigations, gates, and stop checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When two design requirements seem mutually exclusive, name the contradiction, separate conflicting states, then invent a concrete no-compromise resolution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the scientific method to debugging by helping users form specific, testable hypotheses, design targeted experiments, and systematically confirm or reject theories to find root causes. Use when a user says their code isn't working, they're getting an error, something broke, they want to troubleshoot a bug, or they're trying to figure out what's causing an issue. Concrete actions include isolating failing components, forming and testing hypotheses, analyzing error messages, tracing execution paths, and interpreting test results to narrow down root causes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract factual claims from PR copy, verify each claim independently, attach concrete citations, and warn when certainty is low. Runs each claim through proven newsroom verification methods (lateral reading, source-tier climbing, provenance pillars, triangulation, calibrated rating) and puts the burden of proof on the speaker. Use before a pitch, press release, reactive comment, DM, or other journalist-facing draft is trusted or sent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes educational Teams channel posts about Claude Code features and best practices, using templates emphasizing concrete examples and underlying principles (e.g. context engineering). Use when writing a Teams post or announcement to teach colleagues Claude Code usage, announce a feature, share a tip, or document a lesson learned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Make compound growth actually click — see how small, consistent amounts become large over time, and why starting now beats starting bigger later. Use when asked explain compound interest, how does compounding work, is it worth investing small amounts, or why should I start now. Produces an intuitive explanation of compounding with concrete illustrative examples for your situation, the outsized effect of time (why an early start beats a later larger one), how fees and inflation eat into it, and the honest caveats — turning an abstract concept into the motivation to start now. Educational, not financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a sincere condolence or sympathy message when someone has died or a friend is grieving — warm, personal, and free of the clichés that hurt more than help. Use when asked what to say when someone dies, write a sympathy/condolence message, my friend lost their [person], or I don't know what to say. Produces a heartfelt message tuned to your relationship and the situation, drawn from a specific memory or quality where possible, an honest acknowledgment (not toxic-positive platitudes), an offer of concrete support, and guidance on what to avoid saying.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain a contract clause in plain English — what it means, who it favours, the realistic risk, and what to negotiate. Use when asked what a clause means, to decode legal language, explain a term in a contract, or assess whether a provision is standard or aggressive. Produces a plain-language translation, a who-does-this-favour read, a risk rating, and concrete redline suggestions. Not legal advice; confirm with counsel.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a realistic personal monthly budget from someone's income and expenses. Use when asked to make a budget, plan monthly spending, allocate income, or get finances under control. Produces a categorized budget (a 50/30/20-style allocation tuned to their reality), a surplus/shortfall number, and concrete next moves. Educational, not regulated financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map where you are against the next level and build a concrete plan to close the gap. Use when asked to map a career ladder, find the gap to the next level, build a development/growth plan, or figure out what to work on to get promoted. Produces a level-gap map — current vs. target competencies side by side, the specific gaps, and a prioritised 1–2 quarter plan of evidence-generating projects to close them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a sincere, effective apology to a customer, group, or the public. Use when asked to write an apology, say sorry to a customer or community, make amends after a mistake, or respond to a complaint with an apology. Produces a genuine apology — acknowledgement, taking responsibility, empathy for the impact, the concrete fix and prevention, and an offer to make it right — in the right tone, without excuses or non-apologies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and, when the task authorizes source optimization, refactor a concrete long-running Python entrypoint containing repeated independent work. Use for explicit Python speedup or parallelization requests and evidence-backed long-running entrypoints; skip ordinary Python edits, test execution alone, short scripts, and projects that merely contain Python files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a repo's agent context — CLAUDE.md files, codebase docs, skills, and tool/MCP designs — against Anthropic's Claude 5 context-engineering guidance ("unhobbling": Anthropic cut ~80% of Claude Code's system prompt with no eval loss). Finds overconstraint, conflicting instructions, redundancy, stale facts, and missing "unknown knowns"; produces a scored findings report with concrete rewrites, then applies approved fixes. Use when someone says "audit my CLAUDE.md", "context audit", "unhobble this repo", "review our agent docs/skills/tools", or after upgrading to Claude 5-generation models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing the contribution and implications section for a 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) manuscript — articulating both the accounting-theory contribution (role of accounting information) and concrete implications for standard-setters, regulators, and audit/reporting practice. Use after results and tables are final.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user provides 1-50 concrete bad-case search queries for one Viking Search app and wants local deterministic fixes. This skill only verifies request-level fine-operation interventions against a read-only baseline scene and delivers a console-ready configuration sheet, validated payloads, and a replay script. It must not mutate scenes, apps, dictionaries, datasets, recall core parameters, or online defaults.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suggest concrete optimizations for Claude Code usage based on historical session data. Covers cost reduction, speed improvement, error prevention, and workflow efficiency. Use for data-driven optimization planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub Actions security review for workflow exploitation vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "review GitHub Actions", "audit workflows", "check CI security", "GHA security", "workflow security review", or review .github/workflows/ for pwn requests, expression injection, credential theft, and supply chain attacks. Exploitation-focused with concrete PoC scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。