「outcome」の検索結果

When the user wants to price an AI product, choose a charge metric, design pricing tiers, or optimize margins. Also use when the user mentions 'AI pricing,' 'usage-based pricing,' 'consumption pricing,' 'outcome pricing,' 'BYOK,' 'bring your own key,' 'per-seat pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'AI margins,' 'cost per token,' or 'pricing model.' This skill covers pricing strategy, packaging, and margin management for AI-native products. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous senior-operator mode for AI agents that resolve tasks end to end without babysitting and never create new problems. The agent verifies every claim against real evidence (web search dated to the current month and year, the codebase, and available tools, MCPs, and CLIs); it never guesses, never fakes confidence, and never claims something is done without proof. It stays silent and keeps working, interrupting the user only on three stops, namely a destructive or irreversible action, a dead-end with no evidence after exhausting sources, or genuine ambiguity that changes the outcome. Output is short, literal, and human. Use when the user says "not-your-babysitter", "nanny mode", "work autonomously", "stop babysitting", or "no hand-holding", or wants an agent that solves problems on its own, especially hands-on engineering and operational tasks. Do not use when the user explicitly wants a tutorial, a verbose walkthrough, or open-ended brainstorming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate Stripe payment failures and unexpected outcomes from exact object IDs, lifecycle state, events, amounts, currency, refunds, and dispute evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or refining WebGL-heavy landing pages and you need to steer toward a specific visual outcome (premium, technical, playful, cinematic) while balancing conversion clarity, performance, and implementation complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record final outcomes to history.md, not intermediate requests or reversed decisions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

STATA code pattern library for empirical archival accounting research. Provides tested syntax from 126 peer-reviewed JAR (Journal of Accounting Research) replication files (2017-2025). Use when the user asks procedural questions like "How do I implement [method]?" or "Show me code for [technique]" — including: entropy balancing, propensity score matching (PSM), difference-in-differences (DiD), regression discontinuity (RDD), instrumental variables (IV), event studies (CAR/BHAR), survival analysis, Fama-MacBeth regressions, bootstrap, quantile regression, reghdfe/xtreg/areg, clustering standard errors, fixed effects, esttab/outreg2 table formatting, winsorization, leads/lags. Users can specify their variables (e.g., treatment, outcomes, controls) and receive adapted syntax. NOTE: This skill provides code patterns from published papers, not research design advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statistical significance calculator for A/B test results with sample size requirements, segment breakdowns, and hypothesis generation. Use when feeding test results, checking statistical significance, calculating sample sizes, analyzing experiment outcomes, or generating next test ideas based on results. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design experiments and quasi-experiments before analysis. Use when choosing study design, treatment/control structure, outcomes, assumptions, validation plans after scientific experiment failure, or which of DiD, ITS, synthetic control, or regression discontinuity fits the research question. For fitting models or estimating effects on existing data, use performing-causal-analysis instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate this skill for ANY future-oriented question. Triggers include: "Will [X]?", "Who will win [X]?", "What happens to [X]?", "Can [X] succeed?", "What's the future of X?", foresight analysis, scenario planning, STEEEP analysis, futures cone, prediction requests, or any question about a future outcome. Year is NOT required — the engine infers the horizon. Also activate when the user says "predict", "forecast", "what are the odds", "scenario analysis", or asks about competitive races, technology adoption, geopolitical shifts, or market dominance. REQUIRES web search to be enabled — if web search is unavailable, tell the user before proceeding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate this agent for any future-oriented question that requires deep quantitative analysis, historical precedents, and structured scenario planning. Triggers include: "Will [X]?", "Who will win [X]?", "What happens to [X]?", prediction requests with high stakes, foresight analysis, STEEEP scenario planning, futures cone, competitive race analysis, technology adoption curves, geopolitical shifts, or any question about a future outcome that deserves rigorous multi-step analysis. This agent runs a 12-step deterministic pipeline: Claude handles intelligence, Python handles all arithmetic. Year is NOT required — the engine infers the horizon. REQUIRES: Bash tool + Python 3.x. Not compatible with claude.ai web (use Soft Predict Future instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a reproducible final report, literature-outcome synthesis, JSON summary, and refreshed progress plot for a stopped or interrupted NVFLARE Auto-FL campaign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is doing hands-on DOCA AES-GCM work on a BlueField DPU or ConnectX NIC — configuring `doca_aes_gcm_task_encrypt` / `_task_decrypt`, querying `doca_aes_gcm_cap_*` for per-key-type (only `DOCA_AES_GCM_KEY_128` / `_256` — AES-192 not supported) and per-task support, sizing plaintext against the max-buf cap, setting source / destination mmap permissions, validating with a NIST GCMVS or RFC 5288 vector, or debugging DOCA_ERROR_* including the security-critical tag-verification-failed outcome on decrypt. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "DOCA AES-GCM" or "AEAD" — typical implicit phrasings: "decrypt completion IO_FAILED", "auth tag isn't verifying", "NOT_PERMITTED on my encrypt buffer", "is AES-192-GCM on this BlueField" (no), or "encrypted record came back tampered". Refuse and route elsewhere for non-GCM AES modes (CBC / CTR / XTS — CPU OpenSSL), key management (KMS / HSM / rotation), SHA (doca-sha), or general AEAD background.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conversational AI-first interface with minimal controls, clear outcomes, and delegated task flows for agentic workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CRISPResso2 for analyzing CRISPR gene editing outcomes. Quantifies indels, HDR efficiency, and generates comprehensive editing reports. Use when analyzing amplicon sequencing data from CRISPR editing experiments to assess editing efficiency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design guides for cytosine and adenine base editing using editing window optimization and BE-Hive outcome prediction. Select optimal positions for C-to-T or A-to-G conversions without double-strand breaks. Use when designing base editor experiments for precise nucleotide changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes base editing and prime editing outcomes including editing efficiency, bystander edits, and indel frequencies. Use when quantifying CRISPR base editor results, comparing ABE vs CBE efficiency, or assessing prime editing fidelity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen S&P 500 stocks for Mark Minervini's Volatility Contraction Pattern (VCP) and detect historical VCPs in a single ticker's price path. Identifies Stage 2 uptrend stocks forming tight bases with contracting volatility near breakout pivot points; in historical single-ticker mode walks a multi-year history and emits every VCP that formed with forward-outcome stats (breakout / stop-hit / timeout). Use when user requests VCP screening, Minervini-style setups, tight base patterns, volatility contraction breakout candidates, Stage 2 momentum stock scanning, or historical VCP pattern study on a specific ticker (e.g. FIX, TSLA).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and maintain a Stockbee-style daily 20% mover study for US equities by scanning +20%/-20% movers, classifying catalysts and setup context, updating forward outcomes, and summarizing cohort patterns. Use when the user asks to run a daily 20% study, backfill historical 20% movers, find recurring edge patterns, or build a model book of explosive market moves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record and analyze post-trade outcomes for signals generated by edge pipeline and other skills. Track false positives, missed opportunities, and regime mismatches. Feed results back to edge-signal-aggregator weights and skill improvement backlog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run a launch retro / post-mortem", "compare launch results vs targets by channel", or "decide what to keep or kill for the next launch"; produces a structured D1/W1/M1 retrospective — a per-channel actual-vs-target table (UTM-attributed own analytics as the truth column, platform self-reported numbers as reference, every figure labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated), a 5-Whys chain on the single largest miss, keep / kill / change decisions per channel, 3-5 actionable learnings for the next launch, and an outcome snapshot submitted to the launch registry. Not for return math (CPA / ROI) — use roi-calculator; not for the stakeholder-facing report writeup — use report-generator; not for a metric deep-dive — use performance-analyzer. 发布复盘/渠道归因/5-Whys/keep-kill

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "log this launch", query a launch date/embargo, record a stage transition, or update submissions/outcomes; curates launch facts through the append-only launches event stream with optimistic revisions and derived dossier/calendar views. Not for RAMP scoring — use launch-readiness-auditor; not for planning tier/window — use launch-tier-planner. 发布台账/发布日历/阶段与禁运期记录

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define UX metrics and KPIs that connect design decisions to measurable outcomes. Use when choosing what to measure. For presenting the results afterwards, use `design-impact-reporting` (design-ops).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map functional, emotional, and social jobs with outcome expectations. Use when reframing decisions around motivation rather than features. For who the user is, use `user-persona`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。