「poi」の検索結果

Complete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — starting a new target, doing recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports. 中文触发词：漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chinese-first academic Word and PowerPoint workflow for paper reading reports, thesis or group-meeting PPTs, editable DOCX/PPTX generation, Office file inspection, template matching, speaker notes, and layout quality checks. Use when the user asks to read papers into Word reports, create or polish PPT/PPTX, convert paper/thesis materials into slides, edit DOCX/PPTX, inspect Office files, or produce Chinese academic presentation/report deliverables. Preserve English paper titles, formulas, variable names, software commands, and references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Zero-shot time series forecasting with Google's TimesFM foundation model. Use for any univariate time series (sales, sensors, energy, vitals, weather) without training a custom model. Supports CSV/DataFrame/array inputs with point forecasts and prediction intervals. Includes a preflight system checker script to verify RAM/GPU before first use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user for the raw material their posts are made of. Builds a lasting Story Bank of roles, numbers, turning points, scars and positions, or runs a focused interview that turns one topic into a post spine. Use when a draft has nothing concrete to draw on, or the user says interview me. Not for learning how they write (use linkedin-humanizer --mode profile).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build detailed B2B buyer personas with pain points, objections, buying triggers, and messaging angles. Use when given a product and market to research ideal customer profiles, creating buyer personas, or needing to understand who you're selling to before launching campaigns. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes frequency data across your Meta campaigns, identifies where you're overserving ads to the same people, and recommends frequency caps by campaign objective. Tells you the point where additional impressions stop driving conversions and start burning money. Platform: Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add or change an in-app feature tour (a view's guided flyover) in the web app. Use when adding a tour to a view, adding or editing tour steps, pointing a step at a new control, or when a step's target needs something opened first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding collaborative markdown, notes, or descriptions to a feature with collab surfaces. Covers parent entities, service entry points, authorization, content storage, and lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run stepped HTTP load tests with ab/wrk, ramping concurrency levels to collect p50/p90/p99 latency, detect performance inflection points, and recommend optimal concurrency. Triggered by requests like 'load test this URL', 'benchmark my API', 'find the max concurrency', or mentions of p99 latency, throughput saturation, or capacity planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React Three Fiber (R3F) and Poimandres ecosystem best practices. Use when writing, reviewing, or optimizing R3F code. Triggers on tasks involving @react-three/fiber, @react-three/drei, zustand, @react-three/postprocessing, @react-three/rapier, or leva.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic Review Pipeline Orchestrator - Coordinates systematic literature review automation Manages the complete 7-stage PRISMA 2020 pipeline from research question to RAG system Delegates to specialized agents (I1, I2, I3) while enforcing human checkpoints Use when: conducting systematic reviews, building knowledge repositories, PRISMA automation Triggers: systematic review, PRISMA, literature review automation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diverga Dashboard - Live configuration status and feature overview. 24 specialized agents across 9 categories for social science research. VS methodology prevents mode collapse. Human checkpoints enforce human-in-the-loop decisions. Triggers: /diverga, diverga dashboard, diverga status

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research Coordinator v12.0 - Human-Centered Edition (Systematic Review Automation) Context-persistent platform with 24 specialized agents across 9 categories (A-G, I, X). Features: Human Checkpoints First, VS Methodology, Paradigm Detection, Systematic Review Automation. Supports quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods research, and systematic review automation. Language: English. Responds in Korean when user input is Korean. Triggers: research question, theoretical framework, hypothesis, literature review, meta-analysis, effect size, IRB, PRISMA, statistical analysis, sample size, bias, journal, peer review, conceptual framework, visualization, systematic review, qualitative, phenomenology, grounded theory, thematic analysis, mixed methods, interview, focus group, ethnography, action research, paper retrieval, AI screening, RAG builder, humanization, AI pattern detection

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VS-Enhanced Journal Matcher with Journal Intelligence MCP — Real-time journal data pipeline with checkpoint-based human decisions. Uses OpenAlex + Crossref APIs for live metrics. Light VS applied: Avoids IF-centric recommendations + multi-dimensional matching strategy Use when: selecting target journals, planning submissions, comparing publication options Triggers: journal, submission, impact factor, academic journal, publication, submit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified Agent Teams orchestrator for Diverga v12.0.0. Manages Agent Teams creation, VS Arena debate, and subagent dispatch. Single entry point for all parallel/debate workflows. Replaces research-orchestrator and vs-arena skills. Triggers: orchestrator, agent team, create team, parallel agents, debate, competing, collaborate, VS Arena

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diverga HUD (Heads-Up Display) management skill. Configure and manage the research project statusline display. Supports multiple presets: research, checkpoint, memory, minimal. Triggers: "hud", "statusline", "display settings"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unwraps hard-wrapped markdown files so that each sentence ends with a newline instead of mid-sentence line breaks. Joins continuation lines within a paragraph into single lines, then re-breaks at sentence boundaries (period, question mark, exclamation point). Preserves blank lines, headings, fenced code blocks, block quotes, and list items. Use when asked to unwrap text, fix line breaks, reflow sentences, or clean up hard-wrapped markdown or .qmd files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes expert academic paper summaries for social science research, particularly political science and applied statistics. Use when asked to summarize, review, or create a reading summary of an academic paper, PDF, or research article. Accepts a file (PDF or text format) or a directory of papers. Produces a structured markdown summary — approximately 400–600 words — covering primary contributions, major questions and answers with point estimates, methods and data, and limitations and robustness. Includes BibTeX citation retrieved from Google Scholar and keyword metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill covers structural econometric models. Use when the user is building, estimating, or debugging structural models — including BLP demand estimation, dynamic discrete choice, auction models, or any workflow involving moment conditions, nested fixed-point algorithms, or MPEC formulations. Triggers on "structural model", "moment conditions", "NFXP", "MPEC", "BLP", "random coefficients", "dynamic discrete choice", "CCP", "Rust model", "auction estimation", "GMM objective", "inner loop", "contraction mapping", or convergence/starting value problems in optimization-based estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill covers formal identification arguments and proofs in structural and reduced-form econometrics. Use when the user needs to prove or formalize that a parameter is identified — including writing identification propositions, stating regularity conditions, deriving rank conditions, or showing observational equivalence fails. Triggers on "identification proof", "identification argument", "identify the parameter", "show identification", "identification condition", "exclusion restriction proof", "rank condition", "order condition", "identification strategy formal", "nonparametric identification", "parametric identification", "local identification", "global identification", "observational equivalence", "identification at infinity", "completeness condition", "regularity conditions", "Rothenberg", "proof of identification", "identification result", "identified parameter", "point identified", "set identified", "partial identification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production-grade Bayesian causal inference with PyMC, CausalPy, and DoWhy. Enforces DAG-first thinking, mandatory user checkpoints for assumptions, design-specific refutation, and defensible reporting with causal language guardrails. Trigger on: causal inference, causal effect estimation, treatment effects, counterfactuals, difference-in-differences (DiD), synthetic control, regression discontinuity (RDD), interrupted time series (ITS), instrumental variables (IV), propensity scores, DAGs, causal graphs, confounders, backdoor criterion, do-calculus, interventional distributions, pm.do(), pm.observe(), CausalPy, DoWhy, mediation analysis, refutation, sensitivity analysis, parallel trends, placebo tests, or any question of the form "does X cause Y" or "what is the effect of X on Y."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。