「score」の検索結果

Signals scout that watches a PostHog project's most-viewed dashboards and insights for recent anomalies — sudden bursts, drops, flat-lines, and trend breaks at the daily or hourly level. It discovers what the team actually looks at (view counts, dashboard access), curates a durable watchlist in the scratchpad, and balances re-checking known high-value insights (exploit) against discovering new ones (explore) across runs, since no single run can cover a busy project. Anomalies are scored by robust deviation from each insight's own seasonality-matched baseline; it emits a finding only when a move clears the confidence bar, otherwise it updates the baseline memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects running surveys. Watches active surveys for score regressions (NPS / CSAT / rating drops), response-volume drops, abandonment spikes, and targeting drift, AND aggregates open-text responses into recurring themes the team should know about (clusters of complaints, praise, feature requests). Emits findings only when a theme or anomaly clears the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides agents through creating and safely sizing a Replay Vision scanner: choosing the scanner type (monitor/classifier/scorer/summarizer), shaping the RecordingsQuery that selects sessions, and — crucially — estimating observation volume and checking the org's monthly quota before creating, so a broad scanner doesn't exhaust the budget on its first scheduled sweep. TRIGGER when: user asks to create, set up, or configure a Replay Vision scanner, OR when you are about to call vision-scanners-create, OR when widening an existing scanner's query or sampling_rate via vision-scanners-update. DO NOT TRIGGER when: only reading scanners or observations, deleting a scanner, or running an existing scanner against a single session on demand (vision-scanners-scan-session).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds the most informative session recording linked to an error tracking issue. Use when a user has an error tracking issue ID and wants to watch a replay showing what the user was doing when the error occurred. Ranks linked sessions by recency, activity score, and journey completeness, then summarizes the pre-error context. Replaces blind session picking from potentially hundreds of linked recordings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnostic test / biomarker accuracy — sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, likelihood ratios, accuracy from a 2x2 table; ROC curve, AUC, and the optimal cutoff (Youden) for a continuous biomarker; and post-test probability via Bayes. Use when you have test results vs a gold standard (binary 2x2, or a continuous score + true labels) and need to judge how good the test is, pick a threshold, or compute the probability of disease given a result. Emphasizes the prevalence-dependence of PPV/NPV.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mendelian randomization (MR) causal inference — does an exposure, risk factor, or biomarker CAUSALLY affect a disease/outcome, using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IEU OpenGWAS / EpiGraphDB MR-EvE). Use this whenever the user asks if X causes Y, whether an observational association is actually causal or just correlation, if a biomarker/trait is a causal risk factor, wants to triangulate epidemiology against genetic evidence, or mentions Mendelian randomization, instrumental-variable analysis, two-sample MR, or genetic causal evidence — even if they never say "MR" (e.g. "is LDL cholesterol actually causal for heart disease?", "does BMI cause type 2 diabetes or just correlate?", "is CRP a causal driver of stroke?"). Covers trait-label resolution, MR effect direction/magnitude, instrument quality (MOE score), method agreement (IVW vs MR-Egger vs weighted median), bidirectional MR for reverse causation, and distinguishing causation from genetic correlation. Not for plain GWAS association lookups (use the GWAS skills) or fitting your own instruments from raw summary statistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plot per-group distributions of continuous data using boxplots, violins, beeswarms, quasirandom jitter, and raincloud plots with sample-size honesty (Weissgerber 2015), KDE-bandwidth awareness, and N-aware encoding choices. Use when comparing distributions across a small number of groups — expression per cluster, biomarker per arm, scores per condition — and the bar-of-mean default is misleading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Protein structure prediction from sequence. ESMFold-based, single GPU, no MSA needed. Predicts 3D structures with pLDDT confidence scores for drug discovery targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs ML-based protein-ligand pose prediction and scoring using DiffDock-L (diffusion-based), Boltz-1 / Boltz-2 (foundation model with affinity), Chai-1, AlphaFold3 ligand, EquiBind, TANKBind, NeuralPLexer, and hybrid workflows (DiffDock pose + GNINA rescore + PoseBusters QC). Explicit handling of when ML beats classical docking, when classical beats ML, the PB-invalid pose problem, and rescoring as the standard production hybrid. Use when modern docking is needed: foundation-model ligand-pose prediction, AI rescoring of classical poses, or scaffold-hopping in cross-docking scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spectral similarity and compound identification for metabolomics. Use for comparing mass spectra, computing similarity scores (cosine, modified cosine), and identifying unknown compounds from spectral libraries. Best for metabolite identification, spectral matching, library searching. For full LC-MS/MS proteomics pipelines use pyopenms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Completes the online SBTI personality test at sbti.fancc.de5.net, answers all single-choice questions using the model's default personality and stable behavioral tendencies, submits the test, and returns the final type, match percentage, result description, and fifteen-dimension scores. Use when the user asks to take the SBTI test, run the SBTI quiz, get an SBTI result, or complete that personality test website for them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and rank an entire SCF round end-to-end from a CSV export. Supports Open Track, Integration Track, and RFP Track with track-specific scoring dimensions. Reads submission data directly from an Airtable CSV, auto-detects columns, categorizes, runs parallel batch reviews, cross-batch calibration, and final ranking. All output is markdown. Use when you have a CSV export of an SCF Build Award round and need to review, score, and rank every submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benchmark stellar-build skills to measure quality and the lift from optimization. Use when the user says "bench my skills", "bench-skills", "benchmark skills", "did optimization help", "measure my skills", "stellar-loop bench", or wants to quantify whether /optimize-skills actually improved things. Held-out eval prompts scored by an LLM judge, reproducible with fixed seeds. Fully local.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rules for the VenTu data layer — scripts/, public/data/, scores, buoys (IH/WMO), Open-Meteo, IPMA, Ecowitt, news, Dawn Patrol. Use whenever touching data scripts, generated JSON, scoring, staleness display, or any data source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Installs the CARLA Autonomous Driving Leaderboard (leaderboard.carla.org) at a chosen version — 1.0, 2.0 or 2.1 — together with the exact scenario_runner branch and CARLA build each one requires, then wires the four-root PYTHONPATH and verifies the whole stack imports. Detects which version an existing checkout is by reading its code, not its branch name. Use when the user asks to "install the leaderboard", "set up the CARLA challenge", "evaluate my driving agent", "reproduce my leaderboard score", or names a leaderboard version.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when conducting a scored agent-native architecture review. It launches 8 parallel sub-agents to audit action parity, context injection, CRUD completeness, capability discovery, and prompt-native features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and improve website readiness for AI agents using the Cloudflare "Is It Agent Ready?" scanner (isitagentready.com). Covers scanning via API, interpreting results, generating implementation prompts, and fixing every check. Use when the user mentions "agent ready", "isitagentready", "AI agent scan", "agent readiness", "agent-ready score", "MCP server card", "agent skills index", "markdown for agents", "content signals", "web bot auth", "agent discovery", "RFC 9727", "RFC 8288", "RFC 9728", "SEP-1649", "WebMCP", "x402", "UCP", "ACP", or wants to make a website discoverable and usable by AI agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn vague preferences about employers into criteria that can actually be used to choose between them: for each one, what would have to be seen to confirm it, whether it comes from firsthand experience or from an untested assumption, whether it is a must, a nice-to-have, or something to avoid, and which pairs of criteria pull against each other while both being treated as required, then test the set against real candidates. Use when a new graduate is working out what to select employers on, when someone who has decided to move needs criteria for where to apply, or when a stated axis like "a place I can grow" needs to be made checkable; do not use to recommend an industry, job, or employer, to score or rank candidates, or to judge someone's stated preferences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Put two or more Japanese job offers on one basis so they can be read side by side, separating fixed overtime allowance and unguaranteed bonus from the stated annual figure, converting each offer to guaranteed annual pay and to an hourly rate that includes deemed overtime hours, and listing non-monetary terms without scoring them. Use when a user holds more than one offer, wants to know what a stated 年収 actually contains, or wants to see where the ranking changes once the components are separated; do not use to recommend which offer to accept, to score or rank offers, to estimate take-home pay as fact, or to reply to an employer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

指定レースの出走馬に対して10要素スコアリング（直近成績・コース適性・距離適性・上がり3F・G1実績・ローテ適性・騎手能力・馬場適性・枠順効果・調教師）を実行する。「スコア計算」「スコアリングして」といった依頼で発動する。

Interact with the HoneyComb agent marketplace. Browse agents, skills, and tools. Submit use cases for job tickers. Post and vote on comments. Purchase and download agent archives. Check automation scores. Use when exploring the marketplace, contributing content, or acquiring agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a browser fingerprint for internal contradictions with the liarjs CLI - canvas, WebGL, WebGL2, WebGPU, audio, 220 fonts, WebRTC and timezone probes, scored against the TLS/HTTP/ASN view of the same request. Use when asked to run a browser fingerprint test, see what a fingerprint looks like, check canvas or WebGL fingerprint stability, compare a spoofed profile against a real browser, or find out whether a browser profile is self-consistent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a liarjs fingerprint report and attribute each failing check to the component that produced it - what the check id measures, whether the signal comes from the launch configuration, the page-modifying layer, the network path or the machine image, and which failures are inherent to headless or datacenter environments. Use when a fingerprint scan came back with a low score, or when a check id such as webdriver, worker-consistency, gpu-triad, native-integrity or tz needs explaining.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assigns GO terms, Pfam/InterPro domains, KEGG orthologs, EC numbers, and product names to predicted proteins using eggNOG-mapper (orthology), InterProScan (domain signatures), and KofamScan (KEGG), routing specialized functions to dbCAN/antiSMASH/AMRFinderPlus/SignalP. Covers the orthology-vs-domain-vs-homology paradigms, the annotation-error percolation cascade, domain-presence-is-not-function, GO IEA circularity in enrichment, evidence tiering, and bit-score/coverage thresholds. Use when adding functional annotation to predicted genes, choosing between eggNOG-mapper and InterProScan, or judging how much to trust a functional label.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。