Verify documentation coverage and generate missing docs interactively
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,473 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Verify documentation coverage and generate missing docs interactively
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies fixes from a prior review-llm-artifacts run, with safe/risky classification. Respects verify-llm-artifacts output when present to skip false positives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Confirms or rejects findings from review-llm-artifacts before deletes or risky refactors. Loads review-verification-protocol-style checks per finding. Use after a review run, when the user wants to reduce false positives, before fix-llm-artifacts on dead code, or when validating a full-project scan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test kolu's remote-host features (multi-host / padi-remote) in a real browser against a real remote box — the ONLY full end-to-end harness for this surface (real ssh provision, no mock). Covers the isolated nix-run invocation (or just dev, which bakes the same agent source), ssh- provisioning a real remote box without touching production or another user's box, the chrome-devtools drive sequence for host-switch / split / code-browser / per-host-canvas, PID-exact teardown, and the reproduce- first rule for any bug the feature surfaces. Triggers on "test remote hosts", "test multi-host", "test padi-remote", "verify the host switch", "browser-test a remote host change", or before claiming a remote-host fix works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Semi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test execution reference: framework detection (pytest/jest/vitest/go/cargo/junit) and correct run/coverage commands, plus failure-analysis steps. Use when running tests, analyzing test failures, or verifying coverage after code changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic debugging method: 5-step root-cause analysis (capture, isolate, hypothesize, investigate, fix & verify) plus common bug-pattern reference. Use when errors, exceptions, test failures, or unexpected behavior appear. Loaded automatically by the debugger agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codify project review rules as deterministic guards — ast-grep structural rules (with TDD-style rule tests) for mechanical checks, REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md for qualitative ones, wired into the project gate / wf verify. Use when the user wants to define review rules, turn a repeated review finding into a lint/guard, or set up ast-grep in a project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and run manual tests of the project's running app. Runs a session in one of five modes: exploratory, verification, smoke, assessment (UX, localization, accessibility, improvement review), or AI probe. Also writes a manual test plan that holds only what automated tests cannot judge. Use whenever the user asks, in any language, for something to be tested by hand or for a manual test plan — "manual test", "exploratory test", "bug hunt", "verify the bug fix", "smoke test", "QA this screen", "review this screen's UX", "what would you improve", "check the localized copy", "test the AI agent's answers", "write manual test cases", "kịch bản test manual" — or assigns a test design, test plan or test-case IDs to execute by hand. Not for writing automated tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieves and analyzes FHIR Coverage and Organization resources to produce a structured insurance summary with coordination of benefits analysis. Use when user asks to "check insurance", "coverage details", "verify coverage", "insurance summary", "what plan is the patient on", "primary vs secondary insurance", or "coverage status". Do NOT use for clinical data, demographics beyond insurance, or billing claim submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to say a fix works, tests are green, a bug is resolved, a task is done, or a branch is ready for review or submit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate freight documents (Bill of Lading, Rate Confirmation) and check carrier/broker compliance via FMCSA. Track insurance expiries and authority status. Use when a broker needs to generate a BOL or Rate Con, wants to verify carrier compliance, needs to check upcoming document expiries, or when booking a load. Triggered by phrases like "generate BOL", "generate rate con", "compliance check MC#", "upcoming expiries", or "document for load".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify claims, quotes, timelines, and findings against supplied source files and return a source map with verified, conflicting, not found, and manual-review statuses. Use when the user asks to fact-check a memo, audit, timeline, executive summary, research packet, or project brief against PDFs, XML, HTML, notes, screenshots, exported chat logs, or other supplied files before sending, publishing, or relying on the result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates and summarizes the four required authorization forms in a personal injury matter (retainer, HIPAA release, insurance authorization, employment record release). Confirms signatures, dates, scope, and completeness to determine readiness for the investigation phase. Use when reviewing client onboarding packets, verifying authorization forms before discovery, or checking HIPAA and record-release compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simulate pending Sealevel (SVM) warp-route governance txs — signed directly or via a Squads multisig — by forking Solana mainnet locally with surfpool, replaying the exact transactions, then running warp check against the desired registry config. Use to verify that a not-yet-submitted SVM governance change produces the intended on-chain config before it is signed/executed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, check, and read on-chain Sealevel (SVM) Address Lookup Tables (ALTs) for a warp route. Use after deploying, extending, or upgrading an SVM warp route, when transfers fail with transaction-too-large errors, or when asked to inspect or verify a route's ALTs. Fee-enabled SVM transfers bundle 40+ accounts and require ALTs to fit under the 1232-byte tx limit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The post-change validation contract for warp routes — after any step that changes (or proposes) on-chain state, prove the route's config matches the target via hyperlane warp check. Run a live check when the change already executed (deployer-signed); run a fork-simulate-from-owner check via /warp-route-check when the change is pending multisig/file execution. Referenced by every deploy/update skill that mutates a route.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, edit, redesign, render, and verify content-led, structurally diverse, clean, editable, reproducible PowerPoint `.pptx` decks. Use for scientific, lab, clinical, consulting, board, investor, editorial, policy, and operational presentations where alignment, readability, contrast, and balanced density matter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Link prospecting — pick the site's most linkable asset, find pages that plausibly link to it (resource pages, competitor linkers, unlinked mentions, broken links), verify real contact paths, and draft personalized outreach. Never invents contacts. Use when asked to "find backlink opportunities", "who should link to us", "build links to this page", "link prospecting", or "draft outreach for backlinks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, update, and verify Datagrok help pages (help/, Docusaurus), including GIFs and release updates. Use for user documentation of a platform feature, a GitHub issue, or a Jira ticket, for bringing the help up to date with a release, and for recording or replacing help GIFs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates NTM tmux agent swarms and robot APIs. Use when spawning/sending panes, robot state, triaging work, locks/mail, safety, pipelines, serve, code-first/batch-verify waves, or NTM errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rebuild a live web page 1:1 from measurement into Figma, Penpot or code, then verify it. Use when reproducing a page or checking a rebuild against the original.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Handles PR review comments and feedback resolution. Use when user wants to resolve PR comments, handle review feedback, fix review comments, address PR review, check review status, respond to reviewer, verify PR readiness, review PR comments, analyze review feedback, evaluate PR comments, assess review suggestions, or triage PR comments. Fetches comments via GitHub CLI, classifies by severity, applies fixes with user confirmation, commits with proper format, replies to threads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。