1,647 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Implante aplicações e infraestrutura na Cloudflare usando Workers, Pages e serviços relacionados da plataforma. Use quando o usuário pedir para implantar, hospedar, publicar ou configurar um projeto na Cloudflare.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auxilia na redação de conteúdo de alta qualidade através de pesquisa, adição de citações, melhoria de ganchos, iteração em esquemas e feedback em tempo real de cada seção. Transforma seu processo de escrita de esforço solo em parceria colaborativa.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data Scientist role within the AID methodology. Activate when working on: EDA, feasibility assessment, experiment planning, ML architecture, model development & validation, or production deployment & monitoring. Stack-agnostic — ask the user for their stack at the start of any new project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-share leak scanner for Claude Code skills (or any folder). Scans BEFORE you publish for secrets (API keys, tokens, private keys, .env values, high-entropy strings), PII (emails/phones), local machine paths (C:\Users\<name>, /home/<name>, /Users/<name>, UNC, internal hostnames), and client/proper-noun names from a LOCAL private dictionary; also flags service-specific code (jira/github/gitlab/slack/salesforce/notion/linear/ stripe/aws/google) that should be split into a dedicated service plugin. Use when the user says "sanitize this skill", "before sharing a skill", "check for leaks", "is this skill clean", "is this safe to commit/publish/ open-source", "scrub secrets", "redact before commit", or "pre-push leak check". Cross-platform, stdlib-only Python, fail-closed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Package an AI skill, prompt workflow, or internal operating habit into a public-ready release with a catchy hook, safe redaction, useful examples, demo tasks, README copy, and launch messaging. Use when preparing a skill for GitHub, social sharing, marketplace submission, documentation, or community feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create AI-powered social media content for TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter/X. Generate: images, videos, reels, shorts, thumbnails, captions, hashtags. Tools: FLUX, Veo, Seedance, Wan, Kokoro TTS, Claude for copywriting. Use for: content creators, social media managers, influencers, bra...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create AI marketing videos for ads, promos, product launches, and brand content. Models: Veo, Seedance, Wan, FLUX for visuals, Kokoro for voiceover. Types: product demos, testimonials, explainers, social ads, brand videos. Use for: Facebook ads, YouTube ads, product launches, brand awarene...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run 150+ AI apps via inference.sh CLI - image generation, video creation, LLMs, search, 3D, Twitter automation. Models: FLUX, Veo, Gemini, Grok, Claude, Seedance, OmniHuman, Tavily, Exa, OpenRouter, and many more. Use when running AI apps, generating images/videos, calling LLMs, web search...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ingeniero de Sistemas de Andru.ia. Diseña, redacta y despliega nuevas habilidades (skills) dentro del repositorio siguiendo el Estándar de Diamante.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explicit-only workflow that writes a redacted continuation handoff to a unique temporary Markdown file. Use only when the user explicitly asks for a handoff for another session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user starts a non-trivial coding/building task in Claude Code (e.g. "帮我做个 X", "help me build Y", "add feature Z", "搭一个 Z"). Layers an AI-native pedagogical coat over normal coding work — surfaces implicit assumptions in user intent, annotates non-trivial design decisions inline with brief concept-scaffolding for terms the user may not know, and replaces "should I run it?" handoffs with rigorous AI self-verification plus a clean list of what only the user can verify. Skip for pure Q&A, single-line edits, read-only investigation, or refactoring along an existing pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Econometrics skill for OLS regression and linear models. Activates when the user asks about: "run OLS", "linear regression", "ordinary least squares", "interpret regression results", "heteroskedasticity", "multicollinearity", "regression assumptions", "robust standard errors", "GLS", "WLS", "fit a regression model", "check regression diagnostics", "OLS假设", "最小二乘法", "线性回归", "回归系数", "残差检验", "异方差", "多重共线性", "普通最小二乘", "稳健标准误", "回归诊断"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from FAA-HDBK-006D (2020), the FAA's System Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability (RMA) Handbook for National Airspace System (NAS) hardware and software. Use for RMA figures of merit (MTBF, MTBO, MTTR, the availability variants), the bathtub curve and probability distributions, the four-stage RMA lifecycle mapped to the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS), the six-task RMA technical-management/acquisition process, service-thread criticality and the NAS-RD severity-to-target table, the RMA analysis toolbox (RBD, FMEA/FMECA, FTA, Ishikawa, Monte Carlo, Bayesian, FRACAS, ALT, reliability-growth/recovery tests), software reliability (early prediction + reliability growth), and tailorable example RMA requirements for a Program Requirements Document. Scope limits: it is FAA/NAS-specific guidance (not a requirement, by its own statement), centred on hardware-plus-software availability — it brackets out human/service/facility/communications availability, names but does not reproduce the math derivations or external standards (MIL-STDs, IEEE 1633, RTCA DO-178C/DO-278A, SAE JA1011), is thin on detailed worked numerical examples and on safety-case method, and predates any current revision beyond 006D.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exposición graduada para trastornos de ansiedad: Jerarquía de miedo, escala SUDs, planificación y orientación de la exposición. Solo psicoeducación, no ejecución.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Psicoeducación sobre depresión, trastornos de ansiedad, TEPT, trastorno bipolar, esquizofrenia, TDAH y trastorno límite de la personalidad. Transmisión de conocimientos sin diagnóstico.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesises exit interview notes or leaver survey responses into a DRAFT themed report: coded themes with record counts and shares, anonymised verbatim evidence, breakdowns by broad group only for groups that meet a minimum group size, referred items and open questions for the people team, without naming or identifying any individual. Use when the user asks to analyse, summarise, code, theme or report on exit interviews, leaver feedback, attrition interviews or departure surveys, or says "what are our leavers telling us", "theme these exit interviews" or "summarise the leaver survey". Do not use for customer or product feedback, use customer-feedback-theme-synthesis instead; for redacting one document with no theming, use document-deidentification-pass. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts one knowledge article or known-error article from a resolved incident or ticket thread: symptoms as reported, environment, cause exactly as the resolver stated it, resolution steps as performed, workaround with its limits, verification, things tried without effect, related records, keywords and proposed metadata, every statement traced to a ticket note or marked UNKNOWN, with a redaction log and a question list for the knowledge owner. Never decides a root cause, adds a step or publishes. Use when the user asks to "write a KB article from this ticket", "turn this resolved incident into a knowledge article", "draft a known error record for this", "document the fix we just did" or "make this thread into a how-to for the service desk". Do not use for a procedure the team will execute (runbook, operating procedure, playbook), use runbook-drafter instead; for a post-incident review, use incident-postmortem-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts one anonymised DRAFT case study (situation, approach, outcome as evidenced, optional lessons) from engagement notes, status reports, closing reports, emails and metrics extracts the user supplies, with a fact trace to the notes, an evidence grade on every result, quotes only where the user supplied them with speaker role and permission, an anonymisation log and a confidentiality checklist that must be completed before publication. Use when the user asks to "write a case study from these notes", "turn this engagement into a customer story", "draft a success story for the website", "anonymise this project write-up" or "prepare a reference case for the proposal". Do not use for redacting identifiers from an existing document, use document-deidentification-pass instead; for checking whether a document's claims are substantiated, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads a project or processing description and returns a DRAFT data protection impact assessment pack: processing description, necessity and proportionality questions, a risk table with blank rating cells, mitigations to consider and open questions. Never rates risk, determines the lawful basis or judges adequacy; the DPO assesses and signs. Works from descriptions, never personal data. Use when the user asks to "start a DPIA for the new monitoring tool", "draft a data protection impact assessment", "scaffold a DPIA from this processing description" or "what would the DPO need for a DPIA on this". Do not use for redacting or de-identifying a document, use document-deidentification-pass instead; do not use for working out what data an incident exposed, use data-incident-impact-brief instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interact with GitHub using the `gh` CLI. Use when managing issues, PRs, workflow runs, or advanced API queries via `gh issue`, `gh pr`, `gh run`, and `gh api`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit code on the current branch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。