228 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Super Base Context — project doc loader & synchronizer. Triggers even without explicit "load docs"/"sync docs." READ MODE — load architecture/modules/coding/decision docs when work references project state: code work (write/modify/remove); design (features/APIs/schemas/architecture); review (modules, past solutions); tech selection; ADR research; migration/refactor planning; performance/security analysis; tests; code reviews; any spec/plan/design/ADR referencing project. WRITE MODE — NET DELTA vs. last doc sync: additions/modifications/REMOVALS/deprecations of previously-synced code or decisions (docs revert: delete BCU file/ADR), AND rollbacks. User signals: sync docs/done/ready to commit/pre-commit/record decision. Auto-fires before final task-completion reply. WRITE MODE does NOT fire on: brainstorming, generic/read-only Q&A, in-session try-and-undo with no net change, already-synced.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
30 → 5 → 15 funnel for brainstorming new features on the existing Forge codebase. Use when adding capability to a mature install, not for greenfield.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate strategy into a balanced scorecard, strategy map, OKR bridge, and executive initiative portfolio with clear measures, targets, and owners. Use when leadership needs strategic alignment, portfolio prioritization, or a management dashboard tied to outcomes. Do not use for ad-hoc brainstorming with no strategic horizon.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
在任何创造性工作之前必须使用此技能——创建功能、构建组件、添加功能或修改行为。在实现之前先探索用户意图、需求和设计。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategic roadmap management for GitHub repositories. Syncs ROADMAP.md with GitHub Issues and labels, bootstraps roadmap files from scratch, runs brainstorming sessions with boundary checking, and provides quick status summaries. Use when managing project planning, syncing roadmap state, or exploring feature ideas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured ideation for technical problems: divergent generation, constraint framing, and convergent selection. Use when stuck on a design, naming, architecture, or feature approach and need fresh options.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates creative domain name ideas for your project and checks availability across multiple TLDs (.com, .io, .dev, .ai, etc.). Saves hours of brainstorming and manual checking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to explore options, weigh approaches, or think through uncertainty before committing to a direction. Collaborative brainstorming and rubber ducking — divergence-first thinking partner.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Socratic questioning protocol + user communication. MANDATORY for complex requests, new features, or unclear requirements. Includes progress reporting and error handling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Good-faith divergent brainstorming for achieving a goal. Validates assumptions, then spawns brainstormers running different techniques (first-principles, working-backwards, lateral, analogical, constraints-shift, etc.) in isolation, and synthesizes the pool into a report of standouts, reasonable ideas, and hybrid combinations. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
User asks for design, planning, or approach exploration before implementation. Covers new features, components, refactors, or architecture decisions. Creates design docs and proposes approaches with trade-offs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
方案闭环：当用户显式调用 `$solution-loop`，或明确要求进入“方案闭环”时使用。 面向已经存在候选方案、但需要反方挑战和定点修订的场景，在 brainstorming Maker 与 grill-me Critic 之间最多循环三轮，直到方案确认或进入 Human Gate；不用于从零脑暴方案。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine a draft prompt before sending to a coding agent: decomposes goal/context/constraints, flags ambiguity, emits a model-agnostic rewrite. NOT for prompts from scratch (mk:brainstorming).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or compare multiple technical approaches for one validated decision. NOT for product discovery or refining an existing plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer factual project questions (codebase, architecture) with cited evidence. NOT for brainstorming, trade-offs (mk:party), debugging (mk:investigate), review (mk:review), or plans (mk:plan-creator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when refining a draft user prompt before sending it to a coding agent. Decomposes goal/context/constraints/acceptance/output-format, detects ambiguity and model-coupled framing, then emits a model-agnostic rewrite. Supports --analyze, --score, and --deep. NOT for prompts from scratch (mk:brainstorming), plans/reviews (mk:elicit), implementation plans (mk:plan-creator), or general codebase scouting (mk:scout).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until the problem, requirements, goals, non-goals, and constraints are CONFIRMED, then deliver a single verdict — do, don't, cheaper alternatives, trade-offs, ordered checklist, success metrics. Required: the user wants exactly ONE recommendation — not options, not a debate — and their framing is open to challenge (advise may answer a different question than the one asked). Triggers on "what should I do about X", "advise me on X", "am I approaching this right", "is this the right move". Do NOT use to be interrogated with no recommendation (→ mk:grill) — advise also interviews one question at a time, but only to reach a verdict. Do NOT use when the framing is settled and only the options are open (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to decide whether something is worth building (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when you want several perspectives to argue it out (→ mk:party).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or compare multiple technical approaches for one validated decision. Do not use for product discovery or an existing plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。