「concrete」の検索結果

Reviews the design of an existing Power Pages site - a live URL or a local project folder - and recommends what to change, without modifying anything. Captures up to eight key pages at desktop and mobile, scores them against the plugin's design rubric (first impression, hierarchy, narrative, copy, trust, brand, responsive and accessible design, motion, detail), and returns prioritized, concrete recommendations. Use when the user wants a design review, critique, or audit of a site, asks how to make an existing site look better, more polished, or more impressive, or asks why it looks generic or dated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or refine a creative brief that bridges discovery and execution. Use this skill whenever the user is starting a new project, kicking off a website, beginning a brand build or redesign, briefing a designer or developer or AI agent, or trying to align a team before building. Triggers on creative brief, design brief, brand brief, project kickoff, kicking off, briefing the team, project intake, design direction, brief the designer, brief the dev, where do we start, how do we start, write a brief, project overview, scope this project, align on direction. Also triggers when the user has a vague idea and needs to make it concrete enough to hand off, even if they do not say 'brief' explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write builder-honest AI image prompts from a concrete ForgeCAD model, build brief, HLD, or LLD without hiding how the artifact is built.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially stress-tests a legal text — a contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — for interpretive ambiguity: it finds the seams where the people governed by it will later disagree about what it means and turns each into a concrete dispute scenario with both sides' arguments, the likely outcome, and a fix. Use it whenever someone wants to pressure-test, red-team, audit, or find weak spots, loopholes, gaps, ambiguities, or drafting problems in a legal document; whenever a drafter wants to tighten a contract, statute, regulation, or opinion before it issues; whenever a litigator wants to mine an opinion or contract for arguments; or whenever someone hands over a legal text and asks where it will be fought over or for issue-spotting. Trigger it for contract review, statutory-ambiguity analysis, judicial-opinion scope analysis, and drafting QA — even if the user never says "stress-test" or "ambiguity."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide graduated assistance from abstract conceptual nudge to concrete procedural step, with reflection required before each escalation. Teaches help-seeking as a skill and prevents direct-answer shortcuts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits an existing lesson against UDL's three principles — engagement, representation, and action/expression. Identifies specific access barriers and suggests concrete modifications ranked by impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a direct experience into a full learning cycle with concrete experience, reflection, and conceptual transfer. Use when planning field trips, simulations, or practical tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5 concrete real-life actions, leverage-scored against open loops with specificity and anti-fluff gates

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnostic audit for a running cold email program. Checks domain authentication (SPF/DKIM/DMARC), inbox health/reputation from Smartlead, bounce rate by inbox type, and optionally runs a spam placement test via Smartlead's Smart Delivery API. Outputs markdown report + CSV with per-domain/per-inbox scores and concrete action items. Use when reply rates drop, when bounces spike, when onboarding someone else's account, or as a weekly/monthly health check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns one customer case study into the tightest list of companies that would read that case study and see themselves. Decomposes WHY the case-study company resonates into concrete attributes, translates those attributes into database filters, intersects them with a lookalike anchor, then widens with a model judge. Triggers on "find more companies like our best customer", "who would our case study land with", "lookalikes of X", "build a list around this case study", "companies like our happiest client", "expand this list, it is too small". Outputs a filter set plus one merge field naming which case study to cite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps the user come up with free lead magnets or hooks to offer in cold emails. Asks about their business, what they can legally give away, and what would be genuinely valuable to their ICP. Returns 5-10 concrete offer ideas with example CTA phrasings. Use when the user says their campaign "needs a hook", "needs an offer", "what can I give away", or when ICP onboarding flagged a missing lead magnet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the SUCCESs Framework from Made to Stick by Chip Heath and Dan Heath. Use when crafting messages that need to be remembered, writing pitches, creating presentations, designing training materials, telling stories that drive action, or diagnosing why a message isn't landing. The six principles (Simple, Unexpected, Concrete, Credible, Emotional, Stories) diagnose and fix communication failures. Triggers include 'how do I make this memorable', 'my pitch isn't landing', 'people forget what we told them', 'how do I tell a better story', 'our training materials are boring', 'how do I present data compellingly', 'nobody remembers our message', 'how do I get people to care about this', 'my writing is too abstract'. NOT for channel selection (use Traction), not for brand messaging structure (use StoryBrand), not for positioning (use Obviously Awesome).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-tier tech company P7 capability advisor for evaluating, coaching, and giving career advice against a P7 technical/product/expert profile. Use when the user asks for P7-level assessment, promotion readiness, capability gaps, resume/project review, interview preparation, or concrete growth advice based on first-tier tech company P7 expectations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and revise academic papers with a senior-reviewer workflow. Use when an AI research/coding agent needs to work on an existing paper draft, PDF, LaTeX project, Word document, markdown manuscript, rejected paper, or paper idea that already has a concrete direction, and produce: paper maps, weakness audits, insight/novelty checks, reviewer objections, claim-experiment matrices, theory/proof checks, experiment plans, statistics/reproducibility audits, figure/table audits, ethics/compliance checks, revision plans, detailed section edits, or final submission checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review uncommitted code changes to find unreasonable design, unfinished requirements, potential bugs, missed reuse opportunities, and optimization opportunities. Use when the user asks for a review of pending, uncommitted, or unpublished code changes and expects both findings and concrete improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a leader assigns work to a marketing team member or runs a cross-functional meeting — a task brief with concrete deliverables, a deadline with time and timezone, a definition of done, constraints, and check-in points, plus an async-first meeting agenda and action-item template. Trigger on 'assign a task', 'brief for my team', 'team brief', 'definition of done', 'meeting agenda template', 'my team keeps delivering the wrong thing'. Also use when the user says nobody knows who owns what. Not for — the campaign brief the whole team executes from, see `02-campaign-brief-global`; briefing an external agency or freelancer, see `67-agency-vendor-brief-global`; evaluating performance, see `65-team-performance-review-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a concrete implementation plan for missing decisions, feasibility and risk before execution; read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize Android strings, drawables, fonts, themes, localization, and concrete resource-backed Compose values such as MaterialTheme colors. Use for resource declarations and their direct UI lookup; defer design-system token architecture, network image loading, lint-rule configuration, and general Compose implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite AI-generated copy in Spanish and English so it sounds direct, concrete and human while preserving meaning, facts and numbers exactly. Use when drafts feel robotic, verbose or translated and need short active sentences without em-dashes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-search topic resolution. Maps vague queries to concrete entities (GitHub orgs, X handles, subreddits, docs URLs) before searching. Run as first step of any research workflow to dramatically improve search precision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screenshot comparison QA for frontend development. Takes a screenshot of the current implementation, scores it across multiple visual dimensions, and returns a structured PASS/REVISE/FAIL verdict with concrete fixes. Use when implementing UI from a design reference or verifying visual correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create per-subsection evidence packs (NO PROSE): claim candidates, concrete comparisons, evaluation protocol, limitations, plus citation-backed evidence snippets with provenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract per-subsection “anchor facts” (NO PROSE) from evidence packs so the writer is forced to include concrete numbers/benchmarks/limitations instead of generic summaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps find, inspect, and compare (at a high level) .NET project templates. Resolves natural-language project descriptions to ranked template matches with pre-filled parameters. USE FOR: finding the right dotnet new template for a task, inspecting a template's parameters and constraints, understanding what a template produces before creating a project, resolving intent like "web API with auth" to concrete template + parameters. DO NOT USE FOR: actually creating projects (use template-instantiation), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison (use template-comparison), choosing cross-parameter defaults during creation (use template-smart-defaults), MSBuild or build issues (use dotnet-msbuild plugin), NuGet package management unrelated to template packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。