386 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Get system tool detailed parameter definition (Level 2 disclosure). When you need to understand unfamiliar tool usage, check tool parameters, or learn tool examples. Call before using unfamiliar tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get skill detailed instructions and usage guide (Level 2 disclosure). When you need to understand how to use a skill, check skill capabilities, or learn skill parameters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a submission-readiness preflight on a manuscript before arXiv upload. Use when the user is preparing an arXiv submission, asks to check a paper before uploading, mentions hallucinated or fake references, leftover LLM meta-comments / prompts in text, placeholder data (TODO, TBD, XX%), AI-use disclosure, scholarly integrity, research integrity, or arXiv moderation risk — even if they don't say "preflight". Also trigger on phrases like "check my paper before arXiv", "verify my references", "scan for AI artifacts", "scan for LLM residue", "is my submission ready", or "review .tex/.bib before submit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evaluating Hindenburg-style investigative short reports: evidence chains, promoter networks, stock promotion, related parties, disclosure failures, and catalyst-driven short narratives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference for the standard clauses found in commercial non-disclosure agreements (mutual and one-way) — what each clause does, the surface forms it appears in, and how to recognise it in unfamiliar drafting. Use when reviewing, comparing, or extracting provisions from any confidentiality / NDA / mutual NDA / standstill-and-confidentiality agreement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a complete, customized Non-Disclosure Agreement with plain English annotations, tailored to the specific parties and situation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
WooYun business logic vulnerability methodology — 22,132 real cases across 6 domains (authentication bypass, authorization bypass, payment tampering, information disclosure, logic flaws, misconfiguration) and 33 vulnerability classes. Use for ANY security testing, auditing, or code review of web apps, APIs, or business systems — even without explicit "security" keywords. Triggers: penetration testing, security audit, vulnerability, bug bounty, payment security, IDOR, password reset, weak credentials, unauthorized access, race condition, parameter tampering, code review, 渗透测试, 安全审计, 漏洞挖掘, 支付安全, 越权, 逻辑漏洞, 业务安全, SRC, 代码审计. Also triggers on implicit intent: "test this endpoint", "find bugs", "can I bypass this", "帮我测测这个接口", "这个参数能不能改", "帮我找bug".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates several distinct, clickable HTML interaction prototypes for one product surface into a Design Board and collects selection/remix feedback before implementation. Use for multiple UI versions, interaction alternatives, progressive-disclosure options, or when styling is fine but hierarchy/workflow/interaction feels off. Not for static visual-style calibration (use design-style-picker) or a settled CSS tweak.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ships pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size/scope checks, minimal-diff implementation, AI-disclosure PR descriptions, and rebase or bot-review replies. Use for 提 PR / 上游 PR / 贡献代码, "open a PR", "fix this upstream", "rebase against main", "respond to the bot review". Not for reviewing PRs as maintainer (use github-review-pr) or general GitHub CRUD (use github-ops).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare and rehearse a coming-out conversation, tuned to the specific person and the real risk — what to say, how to open, how to handle the likely reactions, and a safety-first plan if it could go badly. Use when someone says 'I want to come out to my parents/boss/friend', 'help me tell them I'm [gay/trans/bi/etc.]', 'rehearse this conversation with me', or is planning any identity disclosure. Produces an opener, a rehearsal against realistic reactions, and a safety plan. Safety and the user's autonomy come first — it never pushes anyone to come out.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write an AI usage policy people can actually follow — approved tools, data rules, disclosure duties, and review obligations, in one page instead of legal fog. Use when asked for a company AI policy, acceptable-use rules for ChatGPT/Claude/Copilot at work, guidance on what data may go into AI tools, or to fix a policy nobody reads. Produces a one-page usable policy plus the decision log behind it. Not a substitute for legal advice; pairs with compliance-checklist for regulatory mapping and ai-ethics-review for system-level assessments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Request a reasonable accommodation at work or in education — frame it around the barrier and the adjustment (not your diagnosis), cite the right process, and navigate the back-and-forth constructively. Use when someone says 'I need a workplace accommodation', 'request reasonable adjustments', 'ADA/Equality Act accommodation', or 'how do I ask for accommodations for my disability/condition'. Produces the request letter, a barriers-and-adjustments map, disclosure guidance, and a plan for the interactive process. Not legal advice — routes to the formal process and to advocacy where needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect path traversal vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find file-loading sinks with dynamic paths), batched verify (trace user input and mitigations in parallel subagents, 3 sinks each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/pathtraversal-results.md. Use when asked to find path traversal, directory traversal, or file disclosure bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Context engineering: compaction, progressive disclosure, structured notes via AgentDB. Triggers: tokens, compaction, memory, handoff, summarize, context window.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Agricultural Systems (AgSy) via the current Elsevier submission path / Editorial Manager — article-type selection, abstract <= 250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract, CRediT and declaration-of-interest statements, funding/AI disclosures, reference style, and data/code/model availability. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for AEJ: Economic Policy via the AEA online submission system — single-blind review front matter, JEL codes, submission and publication fees, format, the Data and Code Availability Statement, and disclosure. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) manuscript via the AEA ScholarOne system — single-blind review front matter, JEL codes, submission and publication fees, format, disclosures, and AEA data-policy readiness. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) via the AEA submission system — membership-scaled fee, JEL codes, PDF and length rules, ≤100-word abstract, disclosure statements, and data/code readiness. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when explaining or planning around ACM CCS peer review, the two-cycle HotCRP workflow, decision categories including minor revision, the rebuttal window, the adversarial reviewer pool, ethics and disclosure scrutiny, meta-review dynamics, and ACM proceedings outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when positioning an ACM CCS submission against the security big-four and specialist literature, including arXiv preprints, prior CCS/S&P/USENIX/NDSS papers, concurrent disclosures, CVE and advisory records, and the attack-and-defense lineage that a SIGSAC program committee expects to see credited.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when judging whether a manuscript's landing point is an ACCOUNTING issue (accounting information / disclosure / audit / standards) versus a corporate-finance mechanism, before drafting for 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research). Use this to decide fit and to re-route finance-mechanism papers to a finance journal before any other acr-* skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing an accepted ACL main-conference or Findings paper for camera-ready, covering the extra content page, de-anonymization and acknowledgements, AI-assistance disclosure, keeping the Limitations section, ACL Anthology metadata and CC BY 4.0 publication, meta-review-driven edits, and presentation-mode logistics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting an ACM CCS rebuttal during the HotCRP author-response window, covering threat-model defenses, adaptive-attack objections, ethics and disclosure questions, anonymity constraints, adversarial reviewer pushback patterns, and decision-focused replies aimed at the meta-reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing an accepted ACM CCS paper for the ACM Digital Library proceedings, covering de-anonymization, the ACM sigconf final format, ACM rights and eRights forms, badge placement from artifact evaluation, incorporation of shepherd and minor-revision requirements, disclosure-timing coordination, registration, and in-person presentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。