「engine」の検索結果

火山引擎合规最佳实践助手：一是根据用户诉求（要满足的合规标准、关键词、关注的风险等级）， 从火山引擎官方内置的合规包模板里推荐该开启哪些、并标出哪些已开启；二是汇总账号当前的合规 态势，把已生效规则/合规包（官方内置 + 用户自定义）的评估结果按类别（法规 / 最佳实践 / 自定义）与严重度聚合成一份合规总览报告；三是当官方基线没覆盖时，指导用户写一条 Rego 策略 作为自定义合规规则并注册评估。可在用户确认后把推荐的模板部署为合规包。Use when 用户想做「合规检查 / 合规巡检 / 安全合规 / 合规最佳实践 / 该开哪些合规规则 / 等保合规 / 我火山账号合规吗 / 有哪些不合规 / 帮我写条自定义合规规则」，或提到火山引擎「配置审计 / Config / 合规包 / conformance pack / Rego 策略」。Trigger on 火山 / 火山引擎 / volcengine 关键词叠加合规场景。部署合规包 / 注册自定义规则属写操作，需用户确认；合规报告 与资源修复严格分离。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, validating, deploying, changing, or troubleshooting Volcengine TLS LogCollector collection on Linux hosts or Kubernetes, including Project, Topic, host group, collector rule, index, binding, heartbeat, parsing, and end-to-end log ingestion checks through volclog. 当用户需要设计、部署、 变更或排查火山引擎日志服务 LogCollector 采集（主机、Kubernetes DaemonSet/Controller、机器组、采集配置、 心跳、解析、日志未入库）时调用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) / Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) — make a site citable by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. Triggers: "GEO", "generative engine optimization", "AEO", "answer engine optimization", "AI search optimization".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage persistent coding sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity (agy), Grok Build, and OpenCode engines. Use when orchestrating multi-engine coding agents, starting/sending/stopping sessions, running multi-agent council collaborations, cross-session messaging, ultraplan deep planning, ultrareview parallel code review, autoloop autonomous workspace iteration, ultraapp building deployable web apps from a structured Q&A interview, switching models/tools at runtime, exposing the orchestrator's 78 tools as an MCP server to Hermes Agent / Claude Desktop / Cursor / Cline / Continue / Zed / Windsurf / Goose, or running as an Agent Client Protocol (ACP) agent that Zed / JetBrains / Neovim / Emacs / VS Code / dsh can drive directly. Triggers on "start a session", "send to session", "run council", "ultraplan", "ultrareview", "autoloop", "ultraapp", "Forge tab", "build a web app", "one-click app", "AppSpec", "autonomous iteration", "iterate until goal", "auto research", "switch model", "hand off a session", "session handoff", "switch engine", "continue on codex", "continue on claude", "move this session to another engine", "multi-agent coding", "coding session", "session inbox", "grok session", "grok build", "opencode", "mcp server", "clawo-mcp", "hermes mcp", "model context protocol", "ultracode", "dynamic workflow", "fanout", "fan-out", "best-of-N", "steer turn", "interrupt turn", "fork thread", "rollback turns", "acp", "agent client protocol", "clawo acp", "zed agent", "jetbrains agent", "external agent", "dsh subagent", "deepseek harness", "clawo runs", "run ledger", "session cost", "coding-agent token usage", "spend cap", "budget limit", "maxBudgetUsd", "durable workflow", "resume a run", "verify a coding run", "acceptance contract", "evidence bundle", "did the agent's tests actually pass", "protected tests", "agent edited the tests", "human gate", "repair loop", "clawo workflow", "clawo verify", "clawo solve", "clawo fanout", "fix and verify", "solve from the terminal".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior {{engine_name}}/{{engine_code_language}} developer that performs direct, ad-hoc code tasks without a formal plan — and the code-execution engine other unikit skills and agents delegate to. Use it whenever the user asks to do something in code right now, e.g. "add this method to this class", "refactor this function", "write a script that does X", "change this code", "optimize this class". Phrases like "without a plan", "no plan", "just do it", or "directly" are strong signals to use this skill rather than planning. Covers writing, refactoring, optimizing, and discussing {{engine_code_language}} code and patterns (DI, ECS, MVC, state machines, event systems). For a larger multi-step feature, plan it with /unikit-plan and build it with /unikit-implement — this skill is for direct, unplanned code work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' 'optimize for Claude/Gemini,' 'llms.txt,' 'OKF,' 'Open Knowledge Format,' 'knowledge bundle,' or 'agent-readable site.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing the systems of a game from a locked concept — core loops, meta loops, player verbs, progression, content systems, level structure, and narrative integration. Triggers on "game design doc", "GDD", "system spec", "core loop design", "progression design", "level design", "MDA", or "design the systems". Produces a design doc plus per-system specs that game-balancer numbers, iap-manager stocks, and godot-engineer builds. Stops at design — no number tuning, pricing, or engine code. For balance numbers see game-balancer; for the engine implementation see godot-engineer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are the Accessibility Engineering Engine — a complete WCAG compliance, inclusive design, and digital accessibility system. You help teams build products that work for everyone, pass audits, and...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select the smallest useful Codex engineering workflow from this repository's existing skills. Use when a task spans multiple engineering concerns, the user is unsure which skill to invoke, or loading every specialist would waste context; return a recommendation only and do not execute the engineering task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level tissue engineering covering scaffold design, cell culture, bioreactors, stem cells, vascularization, and clinical translation of engineered tissues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-160 Vol 1 (Engineering Trustworthy Secure Systems) and Vol 2 (Developing Cyber-Resilient Systems). Use for systems security engineering (SSE): the three SSE framework contexts (problem/solution/trustworthiness), the 30+ design principles for trustworthy secure design, trustworthiness and assurance/assurance cases, security across the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 life-cycle process groups, and the Vol 2 cyber-resiliency engineering framework — 4 goals (anticipate/withstand/recover/adapt), objectives, 14 techniques, implementation approaches, and design principles for the APT/adverse-conditions threat model. Bridges systems engineering and the NIST security cluster (CSF/SSDF/RMF). Does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text, nor cover SP 800-53 control catalogs in depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD M&Q BoK (the Manufacturing and Quality Engineering Body of Knowledge), v3.0 of July 2025, published by OUSD(R&E). Use for the manufacturing-and-quality view of the defense acquisition life cycle: what M&Q engineers do across the Adaptive Acquisition Framework phases (Pre-MDD, Materiel Solution Analysis, Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and Deployment, Operations and Support); the twelve M&Q threads (A–L) built on the '5 Ms'; manufacturing feasibility and producibility; Manufacturing Readiness Levels and assessments; Key/Critical Characteristics and process capability (Cp/Cpk, SPC); the standards stack (AS6500, AS9100/ISO 9001, AS9103, AS9145); technical reviews (ASR/PDR/CDR/PRR) and milestone gates; DCMA surveillance; industrial base and supply chain; and sustainment (LCSP, IPS, ILA, ISR). Scope is DoD acquisition M&Q practice on the Major Capability Acquisition path — it is a best-practice compilation, not policy, and is thin on detailed shop-floor process engineering, contract law, and the full text of the cited industry standards (which it names but does not reproduce).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)). Use for the Department of Defense's five digital engineering goals — (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; (5) transform the culture and workforce — plus their focus areas, the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts, model formalisms/provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout. A vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive. Does NOT provide a how-to method, tool tutorials, MBSE/SysML mechanics, or implementation-plan content; thin on metrics, acquisition-policy detail, and step-by-step procedure. Excludes the CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7150.2D — NASA Software Engineering Requirements. Use for NASA's Agency-wide software-engineering requirements: the software classification scheme (Classes A–F), the Requirements Mapping Matrix and class-driven applicability, tailoring and Technical Authority governance, the SWE-### 'shall' requirements across software management (Ch 3) and the engineering life cycle (Ch 4), the supporting disciplines (configuration management, risk, peer reviews/inspections, measurement, non-conformance — Ch 5), safety-critical and cybersecurity requirements, IV&V applicability, traceability, and the Appendix A definitions. Does not cover detailed software-assurance/safety procedures (see NASA-STD-8739.8), implementation how-to and document content (see NASA-HDBK-2203), the systems-engineering process framework (see NPR 7123.1), or program/project management (see NPR 7120.5).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Register a custom Dynamic Visibility condition for JetEngine — extend \Jet_Engine\Modules\Dynamic_Visibility\Conditions\ Base, hook jet-engine/modules/dynamic-visibility/conditions/register, call $manager->register_condition( new MyCondition() ). The 3 abstract methods are get_id() / get_name() / check( $args = [] ); override get_group() to assign a UI group, is_for_fields() / need_value_detect() / need_type_detect() to control where the condition appears, get_custom_controls() to add per-condition UI controls. The check() $args includes type ('show' or 'hide'), field / field_raw, value, data_type ('chars' / 'numeric' / 'datetime' / 'date' / 'list'), and context ('default' or 'current_listing'). Important — $args['type'] is the user's show/hide intent; condition must invert its boolean accordingly. Use get_current_value() helper for context-aware meta resolution (handles WP_Post, WP_User, WP_Term, WP_Comment, listing macros). Use when scaffolding a JetEngine companion plugin's visib...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data Engineer IA — Expert en pipelines de données (ETL, data lakes, dbt, Airflow, streaming). Construit des pipelines fiables, scalables et auditable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' or 'optimize for Claude/Gemini.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。