「ept」の検索結果

Iteratively improves a PR (GitHub), MR (GitLab), or shelved changelist (Perforce) until it reaches the repository's configured Greptile merge threshold with zero unresolved actionable comments, or until the five-review maximum is reached. Triggers Greptile review, fixes all actionable comments, pushes/re-shelves, re-triggers review only for new head SHAs unless a 5/5 score is already published, and repeats. Use when the user wants to optimize a PR/MR/CL against Greptile's code review standards without creating runaway review loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Process] Use when the developer wants something explained or taught, or wants to know HOW TO REVIEW a change — by default the current working tasks + changes in context, or whatever the prompt names (a plan, a subsystem, a decision, a concept, a bug). AI derives WHAT to explain from the prompt and ALWAYS delivers a teacher-and-coach review guide, high level first then detail: what was done, a VISUAL MAP (system flowchart, domain ERD, sequence diagrams), the user stories and business rules with their REAL test-case IDs, a REVIEW PATH naming which files to open first and in what order with an exit criterion per stage, the technical concepts needed to follow it, how it works, why THIS solution, every alternative option with pros/cons, the trade-offs accepted, the blast radius, HOW TO TEST AND DEMO the change, the developer's decision levers, and written challenge prompts that provoke the reader to pressure-test the work. Works at ANY scope — from one line of code to the whole project: it SIZES the target into a scope tier, DECOMPOSES a large one into understanding groups, BREAKS the work into tasks before the first deep read, and ACCUMULATES the report group by group on disk so a huge explanation stays complete instead of thinning out. Writes the full report to a single combined markdown file (plans/reports/understand-*.md) that opens with a detailed summary section — or delivers it in full in chat when Step 3 finds no git-ignored directory for it — and always summarizes it in chat. Regardless of coding level. Never interrogates, never quizzes, never blocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys deception-based honeytokens in Active Directory including fake privileged accounts with AdminCount=1, fake SPNs for Kerberoasting detection (honeyroasting), decoy GPOs with cpassword traps, and fake BloodHound paths. Monitors Windows Security Event IDs 4769, 4625, 4662, 5136 for honeytoken interaction. Use when implementing AD deception defenses for detecting lateral movement, credential theft, and reconnaissance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when diagnosing a repeated conceptual mistake and designing a targeted correction loop to replace the faulty mental model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining a technical concept and adapting depth, pacing, and examples to the learner's readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

キャリア設計のためのデプスインタビューを実施し、本人の価値観・強み・動機を引き出す。5 Whys、ラダリング法を用いてキャリアビジョンの明確化を支援する。転職相談、自己理解、キャリアカウンセリング、1on1面談の深掘りに使用する。Do NOT use for 製品・サービスのユーザーリサーチ（depth-interviewing-productを使用すること）。

サービス開発のためのデプスインタビューを実施し、ユーザーの真のニーズ・課題・動機を引き出す。5 Whys、ラダリング法を用いてプロダクト開発に活かせるインサイトを発見する。ユーザーリサーチ、課題発見、ペルソナ構築、プロダクト仮説検証に使用する。Do NOT use for キャリア相談やキャリアカウンセリング（depth-interviewing-careerを使用すること）。

Verdichtet gebündelte offene Entscheidungen zu EINEM zusammenhängenden, prosa-basierten Gesamtkonzept auf Basis aller empfohlenen Varianten. Zeigt, wie die Teilsysteme nach der Umsetzung konkret ineinandergreifen, statt den Nutzer durch Dutzende isolierte Einzelfragen zu zwingen. Der Nutzer nimmt das Bild als Ganzes ab oder gibt zielgerichtete Korrekturen, die automatisch in Einzelentscheidungen übersetzt und über decision-briefing Phase 4 ins Register zurückgeschrieben werden. Nutze diesen Skill bei "wie sieht das Ganze aus wenn wir allem zustimmen", "zeichne mir das Gesamtbild", "Gesamtkonzept der Entscheidungen", "decision draw", /decision-draw, "wie greifen die Systeme zusammen". NICHT nutzen, wenn Alternativen pro Einzelpunkt diskutiert werden sollen -- das macht decision-briefing; NICHT für den Abhängigkeitsgraphen -- das macht decision-path; NICHT für strukturierte Einzelblöcke mit Optionen und Pro/Contra (auch bei eng zusammengehörigen Gruppen) -- das macht decision-shot; NICHT zur Herleitung einer einzelnen Entscheidung -- das macht decide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How game development works as a process — roles, subtasks, workflows and role descriptions, especially (but not only) for Roblox. Use this skill when it's about the ORGANIZATION of game dev rather than concrete code: Which roles exist (Creative Director, Engineer, Artist, Polish/Audio, Business, QA-Tester, Game Critic)? Who does which subtask? What does a development chain (concept → backend → frontend → polish → test) look like? How do you write a Game Design Document / KONZEPT.md? How do several (AI) agents divide up a game? Also trigger on "plan a new game", "create Game Design Document", "which roles do I need for my game", "development workflow for a game", "who tests the game", "structure a game idea", "Roblox genre/monetization".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cursorで複雑な問いを、必要な探索・独立したコンテキストでの熟考・統合・十分性確認へ分けて考える。single/panelの方式を使い、親だけで熟考を完了させない。ユーザーが /deepthink と入力したときに使う。

難しい意思決定や論点を、必要な探索・独立したコンテキストでの熟考・統合・十分性確認へ分けて考える。single/panelの方式を使い、親だけで熟考を完了させない。調査はresearch、実装やbug修正はpir2/debugを使う。ユーザーが /deepthink と入力したときに使う。

Create source-grounded paid-ad campaign concepts, messaging, copy, creative briefs, and production plans from a validated brand profile, campaign objective, platform requirements, and optional audit evidence. Triggers on: campaign brief, campaign concepts, create a campaign, ad concepts, ad copy, ad messaging, creative brief, headlines, descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides migration of .NET Framework Thread.Abort usage to cooperative cancellation in modern .NET. USE FOR: modernizing code that calls Thread.Abort, catching ThreadAbortException, replacing Thread.ResetAbort, replacing Thread.Interrupt for thread termination, resolving PlatformNotSupportedException or SYSLIB0006 after retargeting to .NET 6+, migrating ASP.NET Response.End or Response.Redirect(url, true) which internally call Thread.Abort. DO NOT USE FOR: code that only uses Thread.Join, Thread.Sleep, or Thread.Start without any abort, interrupt, or ThreadAbortException usage — these APIs work identically in modern .NET and need no migration. Also not for projects staying on .NET Framework, or Thread.Abort usage inside third-party libraries you do not control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies depth-driven layered color and shadow principles to elevate average UI into polished, readable interfaces for both light and dark themes. Use when improving or reviewing UI components, setting up a design token system, applying consistent depth and shadow to an interface, or making a flat or inconsistent UI feel more refined without a full redesign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute and test GraphQL depth limit attacks using deeply nested recursive queries to identify denial-of-service vulnerabilities in GraphQL APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys deception-based honeytokens in Active Directory including fake privileged accounts with AdminCount=1, fake SPNs for Kerberoasting detection (honeyroasting), decoy GPOs with cpassword traps, and fake BloodHound paths. Monitors Windows Security Event IDs 4769, 4625, 4662, 5136 for honeytoken interaction. Use when implementing AD deception defenses for detecting lateral movement, credential theft, and reconnaissance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GPCR receptor pharmacology — agonist/antagonist/inverse-agonist/biased-agonist classification, GPCRdb structural data, receptor-ligand binding analysis, antibody-target interface (SAbDab). Use for GPCR drug discovery, biased-agonism analysis, receptor subtype selectivity questions, and orthosteric vs allosteric pocket characterization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create acceptable use policies for AI tools within organizations. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-acceptable-use-policy related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write acceptance speeches for awards and honors. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with acceptance-speech related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create acceptable use policies. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with acceptable-use-policy related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write clear acceptance criteria for features. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with acceptance-criteria related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a request to change the terms of a Japanese job offer before accepting it, sorting what the user wants changed (pay components, start date, work style, location, title, probation) by priority, tying each ask to a basis the user can show (the written offer, the job posting, what was said in interviews, their own records), working the timing back from the acceptance deadline, and drafting the message to the employer or recruiting agent. Use when a user has an offer and wants to ask for higher pay, a later start date, more remote days, or other changed terms, or wants to know how to raise it without losing the offer; do not use to predict whether the request will succeed, to set a target figure from market rates, to fabricate a competing offer, to decide whether to accept, or to send anything to the employer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work out the order and the loose ends before turning down an offer or withdrawing from a selection process: whether the offer being kept is actually settled in writing, whether each decline is mid-selection, post-offer, or after acceptance, who besides the employer has to be told when the application came through an agent, a school recommendation, or a referral, which reply deadlines have passed, and what documents, expenses, or borrowed items are still outstanding. Use when a user holds more than one offer and needs to decline the rest, wants to withdraw from a process they are no longer pursuing, or has been asked to turn down other employers as a condition; do not use to decide whether to decline, to rule on what declining after acceptance means legally, or to send any message.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visualises RNA-modification data with transcript-feature metagene plots (Guitar GuitarPlot with 5'UTR / CDS / 3'UTR scaling; MetaPlotR; deepTools `computeMatrix scale-regions`), peak-centred heatmaps (ComplexHeatmap; deepTools plotHeatmap), IP-vs-input paired browser tracks (bigWig of log2 IP/input via deepTools `bamCompare`; ggcoverage; pyGenomeTracks; Gviz; IGV / UCSC track hubs), DRACH sequence-logo plots (ggseqlogo; MEME), 5'UTR / CDS / 3'UTR stacked-bar feature-distribution summaries, and volcano / MA plots for differential modification. Establishes stop-codon enrichment in the metagene plot as the biological QC anchor for any MeRIP dataset (Dominissini 2012 *Nature* 485:201; Meyer 2012 *Cell* 149:1635 — concurrent founding papers from different labs both showed this independently). Use when producing the canonical metagene plot with stop-codon enrichment as a QC anchor, building paired IP/input genome-browser tracks at single-locus resolution, plotting peak-centred heatmaps clustered by condition, summarising peak distribution across transcript features for figure 1, generating DRACH motif logos as sanity checks on the peak set, rendering volcano plots of differential m6A, or reproducing the Dominissini 2012 / Meyer 2012 stop-codon enrichment plot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。