「systematic」の検索結果

Make .NET projects compatible with Native AOT and trimming by systematically resolving IL trim/AOT analyzer warnings. USE FOR: making projects AOT-compatible, fixing trimming warnings, resolving IL warnings (IL2026, IL2070, IL2067, IL2072, IL3050), adding DynamicallyAccessedMembers annotations, enabling IsAotCompatible. DO NOT USE FOR: publishing native AOT binaries, optimizing binary size, replacing reflection-heavy libraries with alternatives. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically reviews code for SQL injection, XSS, SSRF, broken access control, cryptographic failures, and other common OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, providing vulnerable code examples and ready-to-use remediation guidance. Trigger this skill when users ask for a security review, vulnerability scan, or penetration testing assistance, or mention keywords like OWASP, SQL injection, XSS, code audit, or security checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "review paper quality", "check paper completeness", "validate paper structure", "self-review before submission", or mentions systematic paper quality checking. Provides comprehensive quality assurance checklist for academic papers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "debug this", "fix this error", "investigate this bug", "troubleshoot this issue", "find the problem", "something is broken", "this isn't working", "why is this failing", or reports errors/exceptions/bugs. Provides systematic debugging workflow and common error patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent E2 - Qualitative Coding Specialist - Systematic coding and theme development. Covers codebook development, coding strategies, saturation assessment, and CAQDAS guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal Meta-Analysis Codebook v2.2 - AI-Human collaboration for meta-analysis data extraction. 4-layer design: Identifiers, Statistics, AI Provenance, Human Verification. Integrates with C5/C6/C7 agents and Category I systematic review pipeline. Triggers: meta-analysis, codebook, data extraction, Hedges g, effect size

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent D2 - Data Collection Specialist - Interviews, Focus Groups & Observation. Covers protocol development, question design, probing strategies, transcription conventions, and systematic observation. Absorbed D3 (Observation Protocol Designer) capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defamiliarization audit for empirical output. Systematically interrogates every feature of a figure, table, or set of results — not just the main finding. Named for Jason Fletcher, who asked about the spike at t=1 when everyone else was looking at t=2. Use when you have output and are about to interpret or report it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic audit and review by Referee 2. Two modes — "deck" reviews slide presentations for rhetoric, visual quality, and compile cleanliness; "code" performs cross-language replication and econometric audit of empirical pipelines. Use when reviewing slides, auditing code, or verifying replication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文（用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deeply analyze any empirical economics PDF using the five-question framework (五问框架): research question, identification strategy, core estimand, robustness logic, and scholarly contribution. Converts the PDF to Markdown, dispatches 5 parallel sub-agents (one per question), then compiles a 2000–3000 Chinese-character report with a transferable methodology checklist. Optimized for empirical economics papers in top journals (AER, QJE, JPE, RFS, RoF, JFE, etc.). Use this skill whenever the user wants to: - systematically analyze an empirical economics paper - apply the 五问框架 (five-question framework) to a paper - extract transferable research design elements from a top-journal paper - understand a paper's identification strategy, estimand, or robustness logic - run /five-questions, /five-q, or /paper-five-q-analysis - "帮我做五问分析", "用五问框架分析这篇论文", "analyze this paper with the five-question framework"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Main orchestration workflow for systematic literature research - search, evaluate, traverse, synthesize

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly work across quality dimensions (novelty, rigor, significance, and clarity). Use to critique academic papers, research proposals, literature reviews, or grant applications and produce a structured, criterion-based assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Introduction to literature search & review skills - systematic paper finding, screening, extraction, and citation traversal

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic competitive analysis covering positioning, messaging hierarchy, objection handling, and CTA strategy from landing page URLs or screenshots. Use when pasting a competitor URL, uploading competitor screenshots, requesting positioning analysis, or needing to understand competitive messaging and differentiation strategies. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic hook debugging workflow. Use when hooks aren't firing, producing wrong output, or behaving unexpectedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recover deleted GitHub content using the Wayback Machine and Archive.org APIs. Use when repositories, files, issues, PRs, or wiki pages have been deleted from GitHub but may persist in web archives. Covers CDX API queries, URL patterns, and systematic recovery workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A goal-like loop that decomposes work into systematic, evidence-bound ultrawork steps. Use when the user wants a goal loop or durable, checkpointed execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute all tasks from the task breakdown to build the feature. Use after task generation to systematically implement the planned solution following TDD approach where applicable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Root-cause route for actual bugs, failing tests, build errors, crashes, stack traces, and unexpected behavior. Do not use for test-first/TDD feature work, test-report packaging, review-feedback handling, or final completion evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。